Skip to main content

The State of California is the site of two pretty contentious and very important races. First, the race for Governor between former Governor Jerry Brown and Ebay Billionaire Meg Whitman. Second, the race for US Senate between Senator Barbara Boxer and former HP CEO Carly Fiorina. Whitman and Fiorina have poured millions - one hundred plus million in Whitman's case - to beat our excellent Democratic Candidates. California's Democrats are cobbling together small contributions to fight back against the millionaires.

So what is the San Francisco Democratic Party doing with its coffers in this key election cycle? Spending tens of thousands of dollars to defeat a Democrat in a local Supervisor race.

The San Francisco District 8 Supervisor Race has taken a bizarre turn and become extremely nasty over the last couple of weeks. It started with 2 negative mailers from outside the campaigns of dubious accuracy (or at the very least misleading). The negative mailers were targeted at one candidate - Scott Wiener - in a four candidate race. One of them was from the SF Tenants Union, an organization that endorsed only one candidate - Rafael Mandelman despite the SF voting being a "ranked choice" system. The other mailer used the same clip art - the mailers were clearly coordinated, and followed by a mailer from the Tenant Union for Mandelman with the same clip art. OK - so obviously I believe that the mailers were coordinated with Mandelman's campaign or his backers.

Wiener fired back on defense, and also sent out some disappointing (to me) attack mailers of his own. This back and forth was very annoying given that I felt this money could be spent better in general, and I had hoped for a clean race because I saw a lot of positives in both candidates.

Then I got this email from the Democratic Party of San Francisco. This is not the Tenants Union which has an obligation to push tenants rights as much as possible, or the California Nurses Association which has a turf war going on with the United Healthcare Workers. This is the official Democratic Party in San Francisco. You know, the organization that nominated Barack Obama for President, and what not?

The Democratic Party of SF has pumped money into a non-partisan race to run negative ads against a Democratic Candidate. This Candidate, Scott Wiener does not have the official endorsement of the Democratic Party in SF - an endorsement that is chosen at a beauty pageant held by party representatives in the Democratic County Central Committee (DCCC). He does, however, have the official endorsement of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House - the second most visible Democrat in the Nation and the Congresswoman from San Francisco.

In a city like San Francisco, where Republicans have little to no chance in non partisan City races, the DCCC should probably not be endorsing anyone, and if they do, I don't see the value in pumping a lot of money into promoting said candidate. But there is no excuse for putting money into negative ads against a specific Democratic candidate in an election cycle with two critical Statewide races where the Democrat is likely to be outspent. Not only are they paying for the mailer, but this implies paying for polling to determine which candidate to go negative against.

And suffice to say - the mailer itself is "sketchy". As you will be able to tell - I am supporting Scott Wiener for Supervisor. Sadly this diary will mostly be defense. That's why campaigns like Mandelman's (through his proxies or patrons) are willing to run misleading negative ads - in order to take the candidate off message and force him to play defense. I have no respect for that - despite respect for Mandelman's positions on the majority of issues. The campaign strategy is inexcusable - if Brown were to lose it would do far more damage to SF than any Supervisor could ever do.

  1. "Wiener is supported by Republicans". Glenn Beck would support Barack Obama if his only other choice was Dennis Kucinich. I'm not comparing Wiener to Obama or Mandelman to Kucinich - the point is that an endorsement by "the San Francisco Young Republicans" in a non-partisan race with no Republican candidates in the field doesn't really mean much.
  1. Wiener does not have a pro tenant record. Wiener has been forced to play defense on this one. It's one thing if Jack Conway puts out an ad about Aqua Buddha - that really happened. But Scott Wiener does have a pro tenant record. There is absolutely a difference between Mandelman and Wiener on what are called "Condo Conversions" - the conversion of a single multiple unit building into multiple single unit building. This is a topic on which I could have a long winded discussion (think Prop 13) on but I do not believe - nor does Scott - that accelerating Condo Conversions is bad policy.
  1. WIENER’S ELECTION COULD HAVE DEVASTATING RESULTS ON DISTRICT 8 HEALTH CARE - This one is really convoluted. Basically a bunch of dots are connected between some shady PAC-like entity which sent out some mailers for Scott. This entity took money from the SF Chamber of Commerce, which is connected to Sutter Health, which wants to build a new hospital, and the line of reasoning is that this will result in the closure of two other hospitals. They then remove all the degrees of separation in the middle and say "Scott Wiener wants to close St Luke's". Weak Sauce. This is addressed in a letter from someone in Scott's campaign, in depth.
  1. THE SAN FRANCISCO DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOES NOT SUPPORT SCOTT WIENER - this is very weak. The mailer indicates that Mandelman was the first choice of the party, then Rebecca Prozan. The endorsement of the Democratic Party is done in a vote of the Democratic County Central Committee. Wiener lost a close vote with Mandelman. Since SF has ranked choice voting they will make 2nd and 3rd choice endorsements. When Wiener didn't get the first endorsement, he decided to pull his name out. One can't say for sure he would have gotten the 2nd choice endorsement, he could have lost the 2nd place vote on the exact same "party line vote". Suffice to say he had almost 50% of the vote in the DCCC - and the DCCC is only tangentially related to the population of the party at large - the members are elected en masse in July by voters who really don't know who the people they are voting for are - you get to vote for TWELVE candidates out of twenty something.

Originally posted to murphstahoe on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:21 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  How many millions are they spending on this? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Rhetorical question.

    Moderation in most things. Except Reactors. IFR forever!

    by billmosby on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:27:31 PM PDT

    •  definitely 5 figures. (0+ / 0-)

      You really can't "count" the money from the CNA or Tenants Union, they have their own agendas and that's fine.

      But I received US Mail from the Democratic Party. The D8 mailers are all costing 10k plus, so there you go. Multiply that by the number of mailers that went out.

      And even an email requires staff time to write it - even if that's not money a volunteer could be doing something else.

  •  Alameda Dem Party disappoints as well (0+ / 0-)

    They endorsed the wife of Schwarzenegger ass kisser Bill Lockyer for County Supervisor. Ugh.

    try habitat restoration - good for you, good for all

    by jps on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:28:41 PM PDT

  •  It says Nurses and Tenants Union (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    opendna, lucretiamott, lams712, DaNang65

    I know nothing about this but as far as I can tell, the blog you've linked to refers to endorsements/support from two union groups.

    The attack ads are from outside groups unaffiliated with the SF Dem Party.

    So why are you bringing the SF Dem Party into this?

    3 days to resurrect democracy. Sign up at OFA today.

    by Benintn on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:30:34 PM PDT

  •  Parties all suck (3+ / 0-)

    I've long given up on any party being better or cleaner. I only vote for the individual.

    •  Then the Individual Caucuses With a Party (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      not a cent, DaNang65

      The rich have millions and billions and corporations.

      The people have individuals.

      You want to throw individuals up against billionaires and corporations?

      We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

      by Gooserock on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:46:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  So the email you linked to (5+ / 0-)

    says that Weiner's been endorsed by the SF Young Republicans and has been given significant money by a corporate-backed group.

    3 days to resurrect democracy. Sign up at OFA today.

    by Benintn on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 08:35:47 PM PDT

  •  Umm (4+ / 0-)

    How long have you lived in SF?  Politics, not baseball, is The City's favorite sport.  You should know that by now.

    Looking at the endorsements of Mandelman and Wiener I can see how this works out though with the "Progressives" on Mandelman's side, and the "Establishment" on the Wiener's side.  I'll just chalk it up to San Francisco's politics being weird.

  •  Well (8+ / 0-)

    This is a topic on which I could have a long winded discussion (think Prop 13) on but I do not believe - nor does Scott - that accelerating Condo Conversions is bad policy.

    A true supporter of rent control would, since it is (other than the "my relative is moving in scam") one of the fastest ways to decontrol the market - convert it to ownership housing.  Anyone knows that once these units are taken out of the rental stock, Costa Hawkins prevents them from ever being controlled again.  It is a permanent loss of the even quasi-affordable housing stock to permit unfettered condo conversions in a rent stabilizsed market like SF.

    So, it makes perfect sense to me that the tenants union is skeptical about your guy's true commitment to "rent control" (which, of course, San Francisco doesn't have - it has rent stabilization.)

    If you don't stand for something, you will go for anything. Visit Maat's Feather

    by shanikka on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 09:27:47 PM PDT

  •  No on Wiener (0+ / 0-)

    can't believe how many third party, special interest fliers i've gotten in the mail on Wiener's behalf. raises all sorts of questions to me. then came the nasty attack ads he sent out against Mandelman (disclosure: and i'm not a Mandelman supporter either)

  •  The Daly/Peskin crowd hates Weiner (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cory Bantic, debedb

    They got him kicked off the local Democratic central committee, and folks like Peskin now control it.  And the Tenants Union is tight with the Daly/Peskin crowd.

    So there you go.  If you don't toe the line on tenants' rights, there's a segment that will line up against you no matter what your other views are.  That's where Weiner is right now.  

    Maladie d'Amour, Où l'on meurt d'Aimer, Seul et sans Amour, Sid'abandonné

    by FogCityJohn on Sat Oct 30, 2010 at 11:58:21 PM PDT

  •  You can always run for a position in the party (0+ / 0-)

    Instead of bitching...

    Boxer has her own funds, as does Jerry Brown.  Meg is sinking herself and Jerry is frugal and spends well.

    I don't know the details but it sounds really nit-picky and drama-y.  So run for a position within the party and change it from within!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site