Skip to main content


Social Security Online -- Trust Fund Data

Trust Fund FAQs

What are the Social Security Trust Funds?

The Social Security Trust Funds are the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and the Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds. These funds are accounts managed by the Department of the Treasury. They serve two purposes:

(1) they provide an accounting mechanism for tracking all income to and disbursements from the trust funds, and

(2) they hold the accumulated assets. These accumulated assets provide automatic spending authority to pay benefits. The Social Security Act limits trust fund expenditures to benefits and administrative costs.

Benefits to retired workers and their families, and to families of deceased workers, are paid from the OASI Trust Fund. Benefits to disabled workers and their families are paid from the DI Trust Fund. More than 98 percent of total disbursements in 2009 were for benefit payments.


When an Insurance Company refuses to pay on a Legitimate Claim -- the injustice against the little guy is plainly obvious.

Well, Social Security is an Insurance Fund isn't it?


Our FICA Taxes are earmarked.

They are earmarked to OUR OWN Retirements!

They were never intended to pay for Defense, to pay for Schools, to pay for Roads.

Our FICA Taxes were meant to be separate from our National Budget and Debt.

They WERE intended to pay for our retirement dignity -- BY LAW!


The Impact of Social Security on the National Debt
By James D. Agresti and the Staff of Just Facts -- Sep 1, 2001

[...]
When a person borrows money, it is referred to it as "borrowing money." When the government borrows money, it is referred to "issuing bonds." The next time you run up $1,000 on your credit card, tell yourself or your spouse that you are issuing bonds. It sounds a lot better, and it may get you off the hook; at least in the short term.

For this reason, some people refer to the bonds in the Social Security Trust Fund as "worthless IOU's." This characterization is inaccurate. The bonds in the Trust Fund are as real as any U.S. Savings Bond that you might happen to own. The Social Security program loaned this money to the federal government and has a legal right to receive it back with interest.[29]

This can be a difficult concept to grasp, because it doesn't make sense that the federal government owes money to a federal program like Social Security. The key to keeping this straight in your head is to be aware of the following facts:

  1. The Social Security program levies its own taxes.[30]
  1. The finances of the Social Security program are separated by law from the rest of the federal government.[31]

What the GOPhers on the Social Security Commission are suggesting --

It's like raiding the Kids' College Fund -- you may have to do it -- but that doesn't make it right.  By all means, you will restore the Fund when you can -- NOT find extra ways to CUT those Future Benefits, EVEN FURTHER!

That's what being a good parent [or national steward] is all about.


Fact Check: Has Social Security begun tapping its trust funds?
Monique Morrissey, Economic Policy Institute --Mar 19, 2010

[...]
This is simply not true. According to the Congressional Budget Office -- the source cited in the article -- Social Security will continue to run a surplus for years to come, with the combined old age and disability trust funds projected to grow from $2.5 trillion in 2009 to $3.8 trillion in 2020.
[...]
The fact that these bonds can be redeemed for cash at any time will come in handy when we do start drawing down the trust fund, which will probably begin some time after 2020. This is exactly what the trust fund is there for -- to help finance the retirement of the large Baby Boom generation.
[...]

To put this in perspective, future generations will still receive higher benefits, in inflation-adjusted terms, than retirees today because of economic growth. Nevertheless, it would be far preferable to raise revenues so promised benefits can be paid in full. This can be achieved by increasing payroll taxes a modest amount (equivalent to 0.5% of GDP) -- or better yet, by taxing earnings above $106,800, as Medicare already does. Polls show that Americans of all ages and political stripes would support a modest tax increase to preserve Social Security benefits for future generations.

But,  Ooooh NOES!  

There are those dreaded 2 words that strike Fears in the hearts of Politicans, of every stripe --

Tax Increase    Ooooh NOES!  

It makes no-never-mind that those increases are on the upper incomes.

Fear is fear.  Capitulation is capitulation.


Social Security not a cause of, and not a solution to, national debt
by Jay Bookman -- Sep 7, 2010

It’s not, or at least it shouldn’t be, about Social Security.

Social Security is neither the cause of nor the solution to our nation’s financial problems.
[...]

The facts are as follows:

  1. With no changes in taxes or benefits, Social Security can continue to pay 100 percent of all promised benefits between now and 2036. It can do so by tapping a $2.5 trillion trust fund created precisely to cover the retirement years of the Baby Boom generation.
  1. Beginning in 2037, and for every year thereafter, Social Security would be able to pay recipients only 76 percent of promised benefits.
  1. That post-2037 gap could be closed with relatively minor fixes. For example, raising combined SSI payroll taxes from 12.4 to 14.4 percent would cover the bill entirely. A combination of a slight payroll tax increase, applying the tax to earned income above the current tax ceiling of $106,000 and adjusting scheduled cost-of-living increases could also eliminate the gap relatively painlessly.


So where's all the National Debt panic, coming from?

Can anyone spell Faux Fiscal Hawks?


larger
Source: Economic Report of the President 2005 Table B-78


Social Security Online -- Trust Fund Data

Trust Fund FAQs

Why do some people describe the "special issue" securities held by the trust funds as worthless IOUs?  

[...]
Far from being "worthless IOUs," the investments held by the trust funds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The government has always repaid Social Security, with interest. The special-issue securities are, therefore, just as safe as U.S. Savings Bonds or other financial instruments of the Federal government.


If you can't trust your Govt to pay back its IOUs -- Who CAN you Trust?

People across the Nation depend on Social Security Benefits to eke out a meager living.  My Mom is one.  Perhaps your parents are too.

People work all their lives, "investing" in this Program -- without the choice NOT TO !


Social Security Benefits should be sacrosanct -- Untouchable!

Raise the Ceiling to include more of the rich among us, to help into pay FICA, instead.

Enough of Punishing the Poor -- with the Excesses and Greed of the Rich.

Show some Humanity.  Show some Compassion already.  


Enough of breaking the promises made to Workers, for generations.

Start keeping your word already, SS Commission -- and don't mess with those IOU's!

Besides, it's the Law -- it's backed by the Full Faith and Credit of the Govt --


and above all else -- It's OUR Money!  (not yours, in case you forgot.)

Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Wed Nov 10, 2010 at 08:24 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site