Skip to main content

9/11 Ground Zero Mosque Protest/Anti-Protest, Sept. 11, 2010

Merriam-Webster has come out with the top 10 words of 2010, based on search volume: austerity, pragmatic, moratorium, socialism, bigot, doppelganger, shellacking, ebullient, dissident and furtive.  

Looking at the events which led to a spike in each term's search volume gives us an interesting view of the passing year.  At least a couple of these were associated with stories that I completely missed the first time around.  The search and usage patterns also give an interesting window into the shaping of our collective lexicon.

MW doesn't make their raw data available as far as I can tell, but fortunately Google Trends gives us plenty of search-traffic data to play with.  

(Blockquotes used for formatting, since nothing else seems to work.)

Doppelganger: Facebook in February

Story that touched it off: "Doppelganger Week"

Bigot: Britain in March
Story that touched it off: The Daily Mail calling visiting South African President Jacob Zuma a "sex-obsessed bigot"

Socialism: 'Murrica in March
Story that touched it off: enactment of the oh-so-socialistic Affordable Care Act

Furtive: Manhattan in May

Story that touched it off: Police search for a man seen on security video "looking over his shoulder in a furtive manner" after failed Times Square bombing.  (Anybody have a theory about the March spike?)

Austerity: Dublin in May
Story that touched it off: Greek government enacts an economically disastrous austerity plan.

Moratorium: Houston in June

Story that touched it off:  Moratorium on offshore drilling due to the BP catastrophuck.

Dissident: Oslo in October


Story that touched it off: Awarding of Nobel Prize to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo.

Ebullient: Chile in October

Story that touched it off: Ebullient emergence of the trapped Chilean miners.

Shellacking: November in America

Story that touched if off:  Obama saying Dems got a shellacking in the November 2010 election

Pragmatic: All year long, all the world around

Interestingly, there's no dramatic spike for this word.  There is a relatively mild rise in search volume in October, but no corresponding increase in news coverage.  Not sure what might have caused the October jump, assuming it's more than noise; something related to the election campaign?


It's interesting that it takes a certain level of salience in news reports before a term starts sending people to the search engines and dictionaries.  Thus, minor frequency spikes in news coverage tend to be smoothed out, while major spikes in news coverage are often reflected by much larger spikes in search traffic.  I think this reflects the way that we normally deal with low-frequency words; most of the time, we can get by with a vague gloss or no gloss at all, but once they get to the point that we can't even understand or talk about a major story without these words, it's necessary to get a better handle on the exact meaning.  

This might have lessons for the effective spreading of "frames" and "memes" as well, insofar as these are at least partially lexical in nature.  There may be an optimal "pile-on point" at which it is much more effective to add momentum to an emerging but imperfect frame rather than trying to develop a new and better one.  With the tools now at our disposal, it ought to be possible to measure and identify these effects in (almost) real time.

Sentence or paragraph of the year?

How would you put these words together to describe the past year?  Here's my effort:

Ebullient bigots and their furtive, pragmatic doppelgangers declared a moratorium on socialism and gave dissidents a shellacking, all in the name of austerity.

Slate has a different take:

[A] number of countries have chosen austerity. But austerity—ahem, eschewing socialism, acting like Hoover's doppelgänger, retaining your bigotry about debt, being ebullient about fiscal belt-tightening and putting a moratorium on unnecessary spending, making furtive any dissident Keynesian thoughts so as to avoid a shellacking by the bond markets—might not be the most pragmatic solution.

The floor is open for additional nominations...

Originally posted to shenderson on Thu Dec 23, 2010 at 01:02 PM PST.


Looking back, my year is best described as...

10%5 votes
17%8 votes
8%4 votes
4%2 votes
2%1 votes
6%3 votes
4%2 votes
4%2 votes
4%2 votes
29%14 votes
8%4 votes

| 47 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site