Skip to main content

After Clinton, of course, who managed to reform welfare, cut government employment numbers by 15%, accelerate free trade agreements such as NAFTA, and deregulate the banks.

Rachel Maddow said it best.

Below the fold, I argue that Obama is giving Clinton a run for his money....

Like all progressives, I laud the repeal of DADT. But I remain extremely skeptical of this administration, who, in my mind, has turned into the second most successful Republican president of this century.

First, we got a continuation of the unitary executive powers, which included:

In continuing these policies as a Democrat, Obama has neutered all the work that was done during the Bush years to delegitimize these activities, and has reinforced Dick Cheney's world of no-checks-and-balances.

After that, we get Bob Dole's health care bill, complete with health care mandates that originated out of right wing think tanks. The health care bill contains nary a provision to reimport drugs from Canada or allow Medicare/Medicare to negotiate drug prices, two key progressive ideas intended to reduce the cost of health care and shore up Medicare/Medicaid for future generations.

Next, we get an extension of supply-side tax cuts, which codifies the idea that if an administration allows temporary tax cuts to expire it is the equivalent of that administration raising taxes (rather than the original crafters of the temporary component who are responsible). We also get an extension of trade deals with South Korea and India.

Now, we brace for privatization of Social Security via Personal Retirement Accounts.

I apologize for raising my voice here, but what on God's green earth is going on here?!? Progressives need to be very careful when cheering this administration.

Due to his systematic embracing of Republican policies, and thus Republican frames, the President has blown one of the greatest opportunities in history to lock in electoral victory for Democrats for decades to come. It was not uncommon for our grandparents to display two portraits of non-family members on the wall--Jesus Christ and FDR. Now, rather than having our first African American president joining that group, we have idiots in colonial garb with Lipton teabags stapled to their hats.... :sigh:

The electoral prospects of Democrats in the last election and moving forward would be very different had Obama made his Keynesian stimulus impervious to critique, by, for example, coming out and calling for an "Manhattan Project" style push to get America off foreign oil. Rather than cobbling together thousands of unrelated spending projects with nothing linking them together other than the ability of Republicans to scour the list for projects that sounded like something that Beavis & Butthead would laugh at, Obama handed firepower to the enemy. Then, by acquiescing to desires for tax cuts over two or three votes, rather than playing hard ball and threatening to have key committee chairs revoked from incalcitrant Senators and pledging to support primary attempts against the holdouts, Obama forever soiled Keynesianism in the eyes of the American public.

Now, it appears, Obama is attempting to privatize Social Security under the banner of compromise with economic terrorists. Is he honestly trying to destroy the Democratic Party? Obama has already allowed Card Check  to die on the vine as well as Cram Down. The former would have started to reverse thirty years of declining or stagnating wages; the latter would have helped America get back on its feet faster.

We need Howard Dean, or Elizabeth Warren, or Anthony Weiner, or someone of equivalent progressive bonafides to primary Obama, and reset the narrative. Because frankly what should have been a fairy tale storybook of progressive domination of politics for decades has turned into a Stephen King novel for progressives instead.

UPDATE

Comment by CathodeRay
Everyone has a hissy over the diary's title.

Then they conveniently pretend like there's not a list of facts presented in the diary that they should feel compelled to address, one-by-one, were they the least bit honest about their assertion that this President even bears a passing resemblance to a liberal.

Sadly, it's not even a complete list...

So true. Sadly, no one wants to address the FACTS presented in the diary. The only thing that is an opinion is my title and the assertion that Obama has been monstrously damaging to the long-term progressive agenda. It seems people are confusing tactics for the war. Like it or not, Obama is losing the war, and is ceding ground to the enemy almost daily. The mere fact that if I had I written this diary two weeks ago, we would not have seen so many negative responses just demonstrates my point--progressives should be very careful when they embrace Obama because he throws them a bone (e.g., DADT).

Let me add another depressing FACT about Obama, mentioned by a commenter:

Under Obama, we also got record deportations of illegal immigrants.

Originally posted to TheOpinionGuy on Thu Dec 23, 2010 at 01:56 PM PST.

Poll

Should we primary President Obama when he comes up for re-election?

35%64 votes
54%100 votes
9%18 votes

| 182 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site