Skip to main content

The tragedy in Tucson has opened a long overdue debate on the state of our political discourse in our country. Republicans were quick accuse democrats of using the tragedy to promote their own political agenda. In truth these were long-standing concerns that have been voiced by many on the left, including Rep. Giffords, but have been given minimal credence by the press until now. And in this case the agenda being promoted is simply to regain a sense of integrity, proportionality, and civility in our political discourse so we can once again debate the important issues facing the country without demonizing rhetoric and threats of physical violence. This is a bedrock principle of a democracy and something both parties should have insisted upon long ago.

The single factor is responsible for driving this deranged individual over the edge, but it is clear that the overly divisive and toxic rhetoric is a problem that already has and will again result in violence. Over the last two years, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh have created an environment that inflamed and encouraged unbalanced individuals to use violence as as a method of dealing with political disagreements. The inherent danger in this approach has been apparent from the time then vice-presidential nominee Palin said Barack Obama 'did not share our values' and 'palled around with terrorists.' This tactic has been subsequently embraced at the highest levels of the Republican Party.

If you just watched Fox News, listened to talk radio, or read viral right-wing emails you would think that Barack Obama was a 'radical muslim'' who was 'born in Kenya', has a 'deep-seated hatred of white people' and wants to 'impose Sharia Law' in the United States. You might also think he was a socialist, fascist, communist,and/or Nazi who is going to take way our guns and put us in FEMA camps while overseeing a 'job-killing government takeover of health care and the economy' that will create 'death panels' that will 'kill grandma'. For the millions of people that believe this nonsense it is a powerful rallying cry and top Republican politicians, candidates and pundits are all too happy to suggest that this perceived attack on the United States should be fought by 'reloading', being 'armed and dangerous', or with 'second amendment solutions'.

The net result of this divisive and false rhetoric is to convince many people that the elected government is engaged in a a illegitimate, totalitarian, treasonous and anti-christian attack on fundamental American values and the country itself. This isn't the same as telling people to kill liberals, but when you are broadcasting to millions of people, some of whom are mentally unstable, in a period of extreme economic turbulence, it is not completely different either.

The Sarah Palins of the world have found it very economically lucrative to be as incendiary as possible, but it is not just the loudest and most belligerent voices on the right that need to take responsibility for their statements. Too many of the supposedly 'serious adults' in the republican party looked the other way or actually endorsed the smears and hate speech when they found it politically expedient. Thus when Sarah Palin started the death panel lie (named by Politifact as the biggest lie of the year in 2009), Senator Charles Grassley not only failed to condemn it, he actually repeated the lie, lending it the legitimacy of a U.S. Senator. The media is quick to point out that there is vitriol on both sides of the political aisle. This is certainly true, but there is a big difference between a vice-presidential candidate and Senator telling incendiary lies on the nightly news and an anonymous liberal blogger spewing nonsense in a remote corner of the blogosphere.

This violent and inflammatory language creates an environment in which there is a serious threat for politicians and individuals who publicly oppose the agenda of those inflaming hatred and subtly endorsing violence. When our elected representatives no longer feel safe to vote their conscience or meet with constituents, it fundamentally undermines democracy in America. That is why all Americans need to be united in our opposition to any hint of the use of violence as a political tool.

After years of redbaiting and political grandstanding in the 1950's, the McCarthy Hearings were ended when Joseph Welch finally took a stand and stated the obvious. We as a nation, should use this tragedy as an impetus to finally say to those politicians and pundits whose irresponsible hate speech, lies, and vitriol are creating a divisive,toxic, and dangerous political climate "at long last have you no sense of decency?"

Originally posted to aprichard on Mon Jan 10, 2011 at 11:20 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (6+ / 0-)

    "We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men." Edward R. Murrow

    by aprichard on Mon Jan 10, 2011 at 11:20:44 PM PST

  •  Peripherally related (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    grollen, trashablanca

    Can someone direct me to a concise chronological recap of violent right wing rhetoric covering at least the last couple of years? I did search around here and elsewhere but couldn't find exactly what I was looking for.

  •  you know the entire right wing (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    trashablanca, FiredUpInCA

    is baiting the dailykos. they are trying to paint us as extremists.

    its heavy. much heavier than mocking us or calling the dailykos 'kids'.

    its sad. like watching your house be vandalized.

    Sarah Palin is a self described Political Rogue. And she likes GUNS

    by Krush on Tue Jan 11, 2011 at 01:23:39 AM PST

  •  Impotence (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Thirty years ago you could succeed just by being white and anglo-saxon. Within the next thirty years you'll be in the minority. That impotence causes panic among those who are not willing to work for what they want, and especially the long term unemployed.

    But complex economic policies are way beyond these tea bag folks, so instead they resort to violence and gang up with one another.

    We must model peaceful political activism that works.

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

    by MrMichaelMT on Tue Jan 11, 2011 at 03:56:13 AM PST

  •  this is extremely worrisome (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    trashablanca, arlene

    because incidents like this often occur in groups of three. Considering the anniversary of the passage of Roe v Wade is only days away, the next incidence of mass shooting MIGHT happen at an abortion cilnic.  

    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive - C.S.Lewis

    by GenuineRisk on Tue Jan 11, 2011 at 07:40:34 AM PST

  •  It's global too (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Tom Taaffe

    When we bomb and invade other countries, we are teaching our children that violence is the shortcut to getting what you want.

    •  You hit the nail on the head (0+ / 0-)

      While I am in full agreement that the peddlers of hatred should be tattooed for their crimes - if you don't stand up to bullies, their behavior will only grow worse - we also need to get real about the violence this country visits on the world and its place in American imagination and identity.

      when I taught anthropology of violence in the first two years of the bush administration, I had endless headaches from criminal justice students who thought all social problems could be solved by beating, arresting and throwing the problem in jail.

      These same students saw the wars like a football game and their solutions to larger problems -  war, terrorism - was simply bombing them into submission or wiping out the population. No, they did not connect that thought to the concept of genocide, even when that concept was introduced and defined in class. And yes, they were faithful viewers of Fox News. So, they had no interest in solving problems, except to crush those who are perceived to be either the source of the problem or their messenger.

      This changed when war-veteran soldiers started showing up in class. Suddenly my 'radical' arguments about war - or the eventual outcome of these wars - found students who not only agreed, but brought forth examples that finally shut up the criminal justice students. (the radical part was the notion that others might not see the world as we do or that not all wars can be won).

      I use this example to show how even those who will one day be our policemen are as enveloped in our supremacists fantasies and borderline fascist faith in the power of violence to solve all problems.

      The only thing that seems to cure them of this 'faith' is face-to-face experience in war. Something that should be meditated on..........

      So it should be no surprise that a Fox News-driven mob of armchair warriors, should yield one unstable soul actually willing to do what everyone else has been saying: start killing off commie 'problems'. What should be surprising is that we haven't seen more such murders.

  •  ironically... (0+ / 0-)

    "...the elected government is engaged in a a illegitimate, totalitarian, treasonous and anti-christian attack on fundamental American values and the country itself." A resonable person could say that describes the previous administration.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site