Skip to main content

Yes, please consider me a huge fan of Matt Stoller. He is a true progressive, and a brave and courageous Democrat, from the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.

He is a truth teller, and has worked deeply in the 'trenches' of what can only be called,  in my own opinion have become the 'sewers' of our once, somewhat decent and fair minded governmental political body. Unfortunately 'that body' has become what has been apply termed as 'Pigs at the trough,' feeding off the insane greed of Wall Street and the Banks, the MIC, and the Corporate takeover of all 3 branches of our government (4 if you care to include the man behind the curtain that answers to no one, Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve).

When the Shock Doctrine 'fuse' was ignited with a bazooka, and the basic idea of any accountability, in our government was thrown out (the baby and bathwater,)  it changed everything from that point forward.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or Paul Krugman, or Joe Stiglitz, William K. Black, or Simon Johnson, or any other brilliant economist to 'explain' to the workers of this world, what has occurred, and why we are watching day after day, the people of the Middle East and Europe in despair, rage, on strikes, and are now are gaining a huge momentum throughout the world.  Courage is contagious.

If you actually by into the idea that the MSM is feeding us, the usual propaganda machine, that 'what is going on' world wide, is all about Democracy, then you still are not getting the full picture here.  

This is just the beginning, believe me. There is a very delicate balance, between governments and the 'consent of the people' that must be honored, and maintained. When that basic sense of decency, dignity, and humanity is continually breached there comes a breaking point of no return. Now, as some say, we are all Egyptians, and I for one, am so proud of their peaceful union, to come together and in the actions of both Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr., to prove that peaceful revolutions, can and do work, if solidarity is strong, and if courage, perseverance, and fortitude are maintained for the good of all.

It has always been my belief, and always will be my belief, that this world wide paradigm of change we are witnessing, is a direct result of what began in our own nation. When Wall Street/the Banks began the Great Heist of 2008, (and even before that time...30 years coming, the great unraveling of the Reagan years), it set off a deep chain reaction though out the entire international world.

It wasn't enough that the key financial markets, crashed the economy of our own nation, but then this spread world wide, and of course, that is when the powers that be, figured out a way to virtually 'take the workers of the world hostage' and make these same workers pay off the toxic debts that they not only created, and made trillions off of, but managed to, pocket billions into their own off shore bank accounts, for the havoc and chaos they had created.

(Of course that is why they are all so terrified of Wikileaks).

The result of this world wide travesty: obvious fraud and criminal activity that has been continually covered up, was what we are all have experienced world wide: millions have lost their jobs, millions have lost their homes (many are illegally losing their homes with absolutely no due process), credit has been frozen throughout the world, so there is no way out of this gridlock, as the World Banking Crooks, sit on the cash they do have, while, they are all still figuring out a way, to pay off the hidden toxic debts, so who is now going to pay for their 'little party that got out of control?'

That would be the workers of the world.

From now on when you think of all that hidden 'Toxic Debt,' Call it these new buzz words:

'Austerity Measures'...or 'Shared Sacrifice.' Regardless it is bullshit, and that is why you are now watching the rest of the Middle East and Europe exploding. Food prices have gone sky high, as 'commodities' have become the latest 'crap game' for the Wall Street crowd who own our government along with their fellow international players.

Without the 'consent of the people' there is no government, anywhere. We are only as good as the confidence and trust we have in our leaders, and when that is lost, we are nothing more than a haunted house filled the the ghosts of lost hope, and total despair. What pains me, is to see that my own beloved party, the Democrats, are just turning against one another. That breaks my heart.

I don't give a shit how 'pragmatic' you believe President Obama is, if he cannot provide us with trust, confidence and true leadership. It just does not work that way people.

What happened to that trust? You tell me.

My friend Matt Stoller has give me full permission to print his amazing article that he did, and btw, thanks Matt so much. You really connected all the 'dots' as to what is really going on in the world:

I wanted to remind all of you about Robert Rubin and the connection here:

Robert Edward Rubin (born August 29, 1938) served as the 70th United States Secretary of the Treasury during both the first and second Clinton administrations. Before his government service, he spent 26 years at Goldman Sachs eventually serving as a member of the Board, and Co-Chairman from 1990-1992. His most prominent post-government role was as Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, where he performed ongoing advisory and representational roles for the firm.[1] From November to December 2007, he served temporarily as Chairman of Citigroup.[2][3] On January 9, 2009, Citigroup announced he was resigning after being criticized for his performance.[4] He received more than $126 million in cash and stock during his eight years at Citigroup.[4]

Here is Matt Stoller's great great essay, on connecting the dots...bravo Matt !!!

Matt Stoller: The Egyptian Labor Uprising Against Rubinites

By Matt Stoller, the former Senior Policy Advisor for Rep. Alan Grayson. His Twitter feed is @matthewstoller

Via Wikileaks, we learned that the son of the former President of Egypt, Gamal Mubarak, had an interesting conversation in 2009 with Senator Joe Lieberman on the banking crisis. Gamal is a key figure in the forces buffeting Egypt, global forces of labor arbitrage, torture, and financial corruption. Gamal believed that the bailouts of the banks weren’t big enough – “you need to inject even more money into the system than you have”. Gamal, a former investment banker trained at Bank of America, helped craft Egypt’s industrial policy earlier in the decade.

 Our purpose is to improve Egyptians’ living standards. We have a three-pronged plan to achieve this: favoring Egypt’s insertion into the global economy, reducing the state’s role in the economy, and giving the private sector greater freedom.

Deregulation, globalization, and privatization. This should be a familiar American recipe, commonly associated with former Treasury Secretary and Goldman Sachs chief Bob Rubin. That Rubinite rhetoric has been adopted by the children of strongmen shows the influence of Davos, the global annual conference of power brokers. Gamal, far more polished than his father, understood that the profit and power for his family lay in cooperating with foreign investors to squeeze labor as hard as possible. This strategy was targeted at the global labor arbitrage going on since the 1970s, with Egypt’s role as one cheap labor in-sourcer. It’s no surprise that the Mubarak family has $40-70B stashed away in the global tax safe havens coddling the superrich. This wealth was extracted from the youth and women in Egypt’s new factories making low-cost goods for export. This is why the revolution was spearheaded by youth and women, and why the nationalist business elite, with its deep ties to the military, sided with the protesters. Mubarak’s inner circle aligned themselves with international investors and set themselves against domestic business and military interests.

In other words, this is a revolt against Rubinite economic policy. Even the rhetoric Gamal used in pushing his policies echoes that of Rubinites. This Orwellian model of discourse frames corrupt decision-making to confiscate wealth from ordinary people as “tough-minded” because it’s “unpopular.” Here’s Gamal:

 Bringing change is always a harsh task. You must sometimes accept unpopularity. But if you are really convinced that you are making the right decision, you must stick to it. Modernization is worth this price. If not, we will have to be honest both with ourselves and public opinion and acknowledge that we failed. I am perfectly aware of what the consequences of such a failure could be, and I am doing my best. I know that our action will later be examined scrupulously. This is what we call a “result-oriented culture.”

You can smell the McKinsey presentation. Here’s Obama’s budget director, ex-Citigroup executive Jacob Lew who made millions on the housing bubble, justifying his cuts to the social safety net (such as low income heating assistance, which means some poor people will freeze to death):

 These three examples alone, of course, represent only a small fraction of the scores of cuts the president had to choose, but they reflect the tough calls he had to make.

And here’s George W. Bush, justifying his decision to invade Iraq:

 And so what I’m telling you is that sometimes in this world you make unpopular decision because you think they’re right.

The political architecture of the Mubarak regime was directly pulled from the neoliberal shadow government model, right down to the political rhetoric of toughness as a mask for theft. Paul Amar has by far the most persuasive account of the Egyptian revolution. Amar goes beyond the absurdist Facebook revolution narrative, and points out that what is going on is in effect a youth-driven labor uprising, combined with fights between Mubarak-centric Rubinite elites and the domestic nationalist business community tied to the military. Mubarak had made tight alliances with the Islamic right, while slashing the social safety net and bringing in international investors to open low wage manufacturing (this is part of Mubarak’s son’s Bank of America training, more on that below).

This uprising is just the culmination of strikes that began a few years ago in response.

 This revolt began gradually at the convergence of two parallel forces: the movement for workers’ rights in the newly revived factory towns and micro-sweatshops of Egypt especially during the last two years, and the movement against police brutality and torture that mobilized every community in the country for the last three years. Both movements feature the leadership and mass participation of women (of all ages) and youth (of both genders). There are structural reasons for this.

 First, the passion of workers that began this uprising does not stem from their marginalization and poverty; rather, it stems from their centrality to new development processes and dynamics. In the very recent past, Egypt has reemerged as a manufacturing country, although under the most stressful and dynamic of conditions. Egypt’s workers are mobilized because new factories are being built, in the context of a flurry of contentious global investment. Several Russian free-trade zones and manufacturing settlements have opened up, and China has invested in all parts of the Egyptian economy. Brazil, Turkey, the Central Asian Republics and the Gulf Emirates are diversifying their investments. They are moving out of the oil sector and real estate and into manufacturing, piece-goods, informatics, infrastructure, etc. Factories all over Egypt have been dusted off and reopened, or newly built. And all those shopping malls, gated cities, highways and resorts have to be built and staffed by someone. In the Persian Gulf, developers use Bangladeshi, Philippine and other expatriate labor. But Egypt usually uses its own workers. And many of the workers in Egypt’s revived textile industries and piece-work shops are women. If you stroll up the staircases into the large working-class apartment buildings in the margins of Cairo or the cement-block constructions of the villages, you’ll see workshops full of women, making purses and shoes, and putting together toys and computer circuitboards for sale in Europe, the Middle East and the Gulf. These shop workers joined with factory workers to found the 6 April movement in 2008.

The torture and repression had a specific cause, as did the reaction against it.

 In the place of food subsidies and jobs they have offered debt. Micro-credit loans were given, with the IMF and World Bank’s enthusiastic blessing, to stimulate entrepreneurship and self-reliance. These loans were often specifically targeted toward women and youth. Since economically disadvantaged applicants have no collateral to guarantee these loans, payback is enforced by criminal law rather than civil law. This means that your body is your collateral. The police extract pain and humiliation if you do not pay your bill. Thus the micro-enterprise system has become a massive set of police rackets and “loan shark” operations. Police sexualized brutalization of youth and women became central to the “regulation” of the massive small-business economy. In this context, the micro-business economy is a tough place to operate, but it does shape women and youth into tough survivors who see themselves as an organized force opposed to the police-state. No one waxes on about the blessings of the market’s invisible hand. Thus the economic interests of this mass class of micro-entrepreneurs are the basis for the huge and passionate anti-police brutality movement. It is no coincidence that the movement became a national force two years ago with the brutal police murder of a youth, Khalid Saeed, who was typing away in a small internet café that he partially owned. Police demanded ID and a bribe from him; he refused, and the police beat him to death, crushing his skull to pieces while the whole community watched in horror.

What is going in Egypt represents a remarkable new political coalition striking deep at the heart of the Washington consensus. Social media mattered, in that it was the language by which the youth expressed themselves and their hatred of the torture inflicted upon them to extract maximal profit. This alliances, of a domestic business-military community, women’s groups, and a youth-driven labor movement, has parallels in the 1930s New Deal coalition and the 1850s anti-slavery coalition. It is also interesting that the pre-Facebook blogosphere of 2004-2005 played an important role in unmasking torture and delegitimizing the authority of the state, including the justice system and the media.

Seen in this context, Egypt is part of a global conflict of financial oligarchs fighting with leftist human rights activists, unions, and domestic industries. Egypt’s going to need the money stashed away and stolen by the Mubarak family; getting to that money requires an international crackdown on superrich tax havens. Furthermore, the links between Mubarak corruption and various Rubinites are probably as extensive as the torture trade between the CIA and Egypt. The extent of the cover-up of the Mubarak regime’s behavior will be the way to judge what happens going forward. Obama’s mild-mannered and largely irrelevant statecraft simply reflects the paralysis of the foreign policy establishment as the extent of its complicity in the overall economic and political strategy of this repressive regime is revealed.

Of course, it’s quite possible that the Mubarak-style repressive franchise isn’t done. Already, the Egyptian military is trying to ban the labor and professional organizing at the heart of the uprising. Like Obama’s promises of hope and change in 2008, Egypt in 2011 is full of promise, with ambiguous tidings.

And that is what is 'really' going on in our entire world now. Cover ups, Oligarchy madness, Crooks who got so fucking greedy, that it became like a huge snake swallowing it's own tail.   Only, what we are facing now with these insane new hikes in food prices, and commodities, (the new crap game on Wall St/the Banks) is driving a world wide revoluation, as it should.  

Rising global food prices has pushed an estimated 44 million more people into extreme poverty in developing countries over the past eight months, the World Bank said Tuesday.  The poverty-fighting institution said its food price index increased by 15 per cent between October, 2010, and January, 2011, and is just 3 per cent below its 2008 peak during the last food price crisis.  But unlike during the 2007-2008 food crisis, higher prices have not yet affected all regions of the world.

Across Asia and in some parts of Latin America and Eastern Europe countries, costlier food is pushing up inflation pressures, while good harvests of staple foods in Sub-Saharan Africa has so far spared that region from rising prices.  "Higher maize, sugar, and oil prices have contributed to increase the costs of various types of food, though local maize prices have largely been stable in sub-Saharan Africa," the World Bank said in an updated Food Price Watch report.

The report came days before a meeting of the Group of 20 major economies in Paris, where higher food prices is expected to be discussed.

More on rising food prices, and how Wall St./Banking cartels, are driving this world wide revolution:

International Speculation and Rising Food Prices


Henry Kissinger once said that whoever controls food controls people. In other words, everyone surrenders when they see their children starve. That is how the U.S. government subdued the American Indians defending their lands, by exterminating the bison that provided them food and instead handing out food on reservations. The British government did the same to subdue the Boer republics in South Africa by forcing the Boer civilian population into the first concentration camps ever and letting them starve.

International cartels now use their control over the global food supply to make huge profits. There are six major corporations that control the purchase and sale of agricultural products: Cargill, Kraft, Bunge & Born, ADM (Archer Daniels Midland), Nestlé and General Mills. Food prices are set at exchanges in Chicago, New York and London.

Some countries shield their population from commodity speculation on basic foods by restricting the export of their agricultural staples until domestic demand is satisfied. This has a clear and legitimate purpose: to stabilize domestic prices and ensure supply for their own people. Domestic prices are also an uncomfortable testimony of real prices and temper full international market control over pricing.

Just so you don't forget, about the past:

The Wall Street Journal published a front-page article Friday reporting that the nine biggest US banks, which have received a combined $125 billion in taxpayer funds as part of the $700 billion bailout authored by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and passed by the Democratic Congress, owed their executives more than $40 billion for recent years’ compensation and pensions as of the end of 2007. This means that nearly a third of the public funds given to these banks will ultimately be used to increase the private fortunes of a handful of multimillionaire Wall Street executives.

As the Journal explains, the minimal restrictions on future executive compensation stipulated in the bailout bill do not affect deferred payments to executives accumulated over previous years. Since such deferred payment accounts are commonplace in the banking industry and are the preferred means by which top executives build up nest eggs in the hundreds of millions of dollars, those who are primarily responsible for the financial disaster and, in many cases, the ruin of their own companies, will emerge from the crisis richer than ever. As the Journal puts it: “The deferred-compensation programs for executives are like 401(k) plans on steroids.” At some of the banks that have received government handouts, the newspaper notes, the total amounts previously incurred and owed to their executives exceed what they owe in pensions to their entire work forces.

The newspaper notes that at Goldman Sachs, formerly headed by Paulson, “the $11.8 billion obligation primarily for deferred executive compensation dwarfed the liability for its broad-based pension plan for all employees. That was just $399 million.” Goldman received $10 billion of the $125 billion doled out to the biggest banks. JPMorgan Chase, which was granted $25 billion, owes its top officers $8.5 billion. Citigroup, another $25 billion recipient, owes $5 billion, and Morgan Stanley, which got $10 billion in taxpayer money, is in debt to its top executives to the tune of $10 to $12 billion. A separate article in the same issue of the Journal amplifies this picture of parasitism and criminality. Headlined “Securities Firms Tackle Pay Issue,” it deals with discussions among the top executives of Wall Street firms such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch over the advisability of paring down their traditional multimillion-dollar year-end bonuses in the face of growing public outrage.

And btw, that is from an 'old article'....

So, again, I'm just wondering how it feels for Robert Rubin to have pulled in $ 126 Million bucks, from Citi-group, who managed to bilk millions of people out of their own homes.

As the old saying goes: 'You can't polish a Turd.' And lord knows, we sure have plenty of those in our own fuzzy ginger ale fruit punch bowl of Turds in our own party.

The very fact that we are giving another $ 170 billion dollars to the corruption of the black hole of the endless Afganistan war, while cutting costs for the American elderly for fuel assistance, is outrageous, and disgusting.  It is insane, and we wonder why, this world wide revolution is happening while food prices are going insane?

The real question is simple for me:  how much do the working people of all nations need to keep paying for the repression of true accountability, and for a sane and legal way back to, at least a decent somewhat, temporal accountability, that will lead us back to holding our so called' Corporate Over Lords' to understand that there are true basic premises that uphold or destroy all civilizations.  

That point has no come full circle world wide, and I believe that is exactly what my mentor and friend, Matt Stoller is talking about here.  

One last article I thought you might want to visit on this same subject:

The sad truth is that the budget deficit is a direct outcome of the economic policies that were adopted by both parties over the years. National debt nearly doubled under Bush, and continued to grow under Obama, while the financial system pillaged the country for trillions of dollars twice - first, during the leveraged build-up to the economic collapse, and then, via a stockpile of creative subsidization awards afterwards, the underlying debt build-up for which, lingers like a bad hangover.  Unless the real economy becomes healthier, more people are employed and we institute a far more progressive tax and distribution structure, there is simply no mathematical way, to balance this budget.

So, there is no silver bullet amount of spending cuts that is sufficient to balance it either, particularly as long as we are only looking at, and debating about, the spending side of the US balance sheet, and only a portion of the non-discretionary component, at that. Quibbling over whether Obama is cutting enough or not enough, is quibbling over the wrong question. Obama showcasing just the cuts as these 'hard choices' that will get us more towards balance, is meaningless. It is equally misleading for the GOP  to focus on a separate subset of potential spending cuts, and conclude that this extra $100 billion will do the trick. Making $1.1 trillion of cuts over ten years, all things equal, with a projected deficit per year that's higher than that, won't balance any budget, for any political party.   You know what would have been really cool?

If Obama had just said - you know what - the budget can't be balanced, deal with it. And you know why? Because over the past two years, the economy, that was trashed by the banking sector, still sucks. And, during the entirety of the Bush administration, while prepping the economy to suck, debt to pay for wars and tax cuts kept growing. And, when the banking system was facing the abyss, we opened our checkbooks, we stimulated the hell out of it, but we did it mostly through issuing Treasury debt and the magical Fed printing machines - so it doesn't show up in the budget that we're all debating, except for a couple hundred billion to Fannie and Freddie and what remains of the stellar TARP project. And you know what? I admit that was a stupid thing to do. It was stupid when it started under Bush, and it was stupid when it continued under me and the economic team I appointed to keep it going. The bailout binge increased our public debt by 50% under my reckless economic advisors, Treasury Secretary, the Federal Reserve. And, hell if other countries decide to dump Treasuries in bulk, and their interest rates rise, and Bernanke can't QE them down fast enough, our budget deficit will gap like the Grand Canyon.   Meanwhile folks, we need revenue. Just like banks need profits to pay bonuses. And, that's something that can only be remedied through a healthier economy - not just for corporations, stock market investors and banks - that are sitting on $2 trillion in cash, with $1 trillion parked at the Fed  - but for the general population that still counts 26 million people under or unemployed, not to mention a historically high 48.9% unemployment rate for youth, rising food and basic needs costs, continued foreclosures on entire families, and health insurance rates that will double within the next three years. You know what, when this country needed revenue in the past, Republican presidents and congresses did the math. Now, it's my turn. Let the GOP explain exactly how a lower corporate tax contribution created more jobs in the past two years, and while they're trying to figure that out, I'm gonna show some real leadership, and do everything I can - not to balance the budget - but to balance our economy.    Oh well.

God I love that I do Matt Stoller, and William K. Black, and others...

Just wanted to share this with all of you, so the floor is yours, but want to thank Matt again, for allowing me to reprint his great essay.

I welcome a civil debate here, and BTW, I don't 'do pie fights'.....

Ms. B.


Originally posted to Badabing on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 05:34 PM PST.

Also republished by Shock Doctrine Watch.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  Here's the confirmation for your thesis (9+ / 0-)
      Food prices push millions into poverty

      By Howard Schneider
      Washington Post Staff Writer
      Tuesday, February 15, 2011; 7:17 PM

      Rising food prices pushed tens of millions of people into extreme poverty last year and are reaching "dangerous levels" in some countries, World Bank President Robert Zoellick said Tuesday as he released new data showing the cost of grain and other staples is now near a historic high.

      The costs of some key commodities such as wheat have doubled in the past year, and a World Bank index of overall food costs rose 15 percent from October through January. The bank's food price index, which covers the costs of grain, sugar, food oils and other staples, is now just 3 percent below its historic high in 2008 - a level that touched off food riots in several countries.

      I was about to start a diary on this topic when I saw this news, but this diary far surpasses the one I was contemplating writing.

      "Those old Wall Street boys are putting up an awful fight to keep the government from putting a cop on their corner." - Will Rogers

      by Lefty Coaster on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:58:50 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Tipped, Rec'd and Republished! (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Road Dog
    •  great Diary but I don't have a rec button (0+ / 0-)

      to click on. This puzzles me and after looking at comments it probably only me experiencing this. Oh well, but all thru this thread there are  a few comments that have rec link below, and I saw a lot of others I wanted to rec but no link. Strange.
      (I refreshed, clicked both expand and shrink to see if it reset correctly. It didn't work , but I could rec the diary.)

      So there is missing mojo for the Diary and others in the thread.

      without the ants the rainforest dies

      by aliasalias on Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 10:21:16 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Well written journal (10+ / 0-)

    I met Matt a couple of times working on the Corzine campaign against Forester.  Matt is a real good analyst. He did a knock job blogging for that campaign.

    To the points in the journal, damn right.  This is all about economics and not "democracy" in some theoretical sense.

    "The real wealth of a nation consists of the contributions of its people and nature." -- Rianne Eisler

    by noofsh on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 05:51:43 PM PST

    •  thanks so much noofsh...this is not (7+ / 0-)

      about 'Democracy' at all, it is about the continual way the Powers that Be, just keep destroying the working people of the world.

      At what point do we not get that?  

      I abhor violence, but I can see what Matt is saying is so true.

      Of course the MSM, will never discuss the rising food prices, that Wall St/Bankers of the world are feeding this world wide revolution,  but that is what is really going on.

      Thanks for your comment.  I so appreciate the validation.

      Ms. B.

      “I hope the two wings of the Democratic Party may flap together.” William Jennings Bryan

      by Badabing on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 06:09:20 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Just saw an article recently (7+ / 0-)

        that the price of clothing is predicted to go up 10% in the spring.

        The hits just keep on coming for the poor and middle classes.

        Humankind cannot stand too much reality. T.S. Eliot

        by blueoasis on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 06:47:40 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  I hate violence as much as you (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        bablhous, CMikkelson, Floande

        but at some point it will have to come to that.

        There is just no way around it.

        These rich greedy fucksticks will have to suffer as a warning to all future would be greedy fucksticks.  Mubarak was very lucky to get out alive.  I suspect many of the other leaders won't be so lucky.  I also suspect that this wave will not end at the edge of Africa and the Middle East.  Ireland and Greece were forced to swallow hard pills and they're not curing what ailed those countries.  If forced to swallow more pills I fear that the leaders of those countries will be forced to swallow something other than pills.  Unfortunately the leaders aren't the guilty parties, they just entered in foolish pacts with the real devils, the banks.  Until the banks are attacked and teh people who run them forced to pay, the wave will keep crashing and crashing and violence will happen sooner or later.  You can squeeze the average person so much before they are forced to defend themselves.

        This is your world These are your people You can live for yourself today Or help build tomorrow for everyone -8.75, -8.00

        by DisNoir36 on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:03:02 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Let us hope it will not come to that.....nt. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Road Dog

          “I hope the two wings of the Democratic Party may flap together.” William Jennings Bryan

          by Badabing on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:30:20 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  That's like hoping against rain (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            bablhous, CMikkelson, Badabing

            in the Amazon or against sun in the Sahara.

            Hate to tell you but it will come to violence.  Already has overseas in certain part but it's been minimal.  

            At some point though there will be a 'Let Them Eat Cake' moment and it will blow up like it did over 200 years ago in France when the rich squeezed so much the poor went crazy and slaughtered them all.

            This is your world These are your people You can live for yourself today Or help build tomorrow for everyone -8.75, -8.00

            by DisNoir36 on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 08:29:29 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  the rich and powerfull (0+ / 0-)

              are armed to the teeth,

              the only way to take power from them is through violence

              Check your history books

              when you think about it the TEA PARTY very much resembles the thugs Mubarac used against the Egyptian people in Tahir square

              and now in Iran the religious Holy men in Black Robes are calling for the death of all the Opposition Leaders.....

              is violence avoidable....I think not

              i am the hammer swinging, braided hair warrior next to Mel Gibson in Brave Heart, other peoples blood on my face, my goal is to take out two or three of them before they get me

              Brave people gave their lives in Tahir Square and the US leaders shrugged,

              We can expect nothing from our present Govt except violent oppression via FBI, CIA, NSA, NSO.... add absurdum

              "Nearly everything you do is of no importance, but it is important that you do it" Mohandas Gandhi

              by CMikkelson on Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 04:57:20 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

  •  Nice... (10+ / 0-)

    Makes me nervous though...

    I've been saying for some time now that the people Living happily on Planet Good Morning America are going to find out just how nasty the Corporate Agenda is when they start burning food to protect Profit.

    I've wanted to be wrong, on so many things, I've wanted to be wrong, but this one especially.

    I hope I'm wrong.

    Democracy - 1 person 1 vote. Free Markets - More dollars more power.

    by k9disc on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 05:58:01 PM PST

    •  You are not wrong, all. (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      k9disc, blueoasis, 4Freedom, Road Dog

      When the trust is broken, it is broken, and that is what is really going on world wide.

      The Banks/Wall St are in total control now, and who is paying for that?

      It really is that simple.  We just do not have the courage of the Egyptians, or the Europeans....the Sub prime cover up, has destroyed our entire national and international economy, with no accountability.

      As Matt Stoller pointed out:  The MSM tells us this is all about 'Democracy' when Democracy in our own nation has been destroyed.

      There is nothing wrong with the precepts of our own party platform....

      It has just become meaningless.  

      Ms. B.

      “I hope the two wings of the Democratic Party may flap together.” William Jennings Bryan

      by Badabing on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 06:35:11 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  What honestly worries me (12+ / 0-)

    is that I look around where I live, southern Nevada, and I see a hell of a lot of people who are much more likely to attack the people who are trying to help them rather than the ones who are helping to keep them down.

    Fox News, the Citizen's United Brigade, and now the Village defense to the point of deification of the Tea Party, has got a lot of poor and middle class folks screaming for the heads of the people who want them to have affordable health insurance and a better-than-decent standard of living.

    I have this horrible nightmare where I see blue collar working class people people in the streets marching... angrily demanding more Right to Work laws and making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent because they have been so conned and lied to.

    I don't get angry at the Democratic Party for not being liberal enough, I get angry with the Democratic Party for being feckless and being allergic to partisan conflict.

    It doesn't really do a heck of a lot of good if the American people protest the pain they find themselves in by doubling down on the people who brought it to them in the first place.

    The same people who are constantly harping on the deficit as the most important thing ever also refuse to admit or advertise that there is simply no way to cut your way to a balanced budget, let alone erasing trillions of dollars in debt.

    You can't do it without tax increases, and I see so many people who have been conned into thinking that 'what's good for the Oligarch is good for me' also being conned into believing that you can do it by cutting social spending.

    •  I still have some faith (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Badabing, Floande, Road Dog

      I have some faith that at some point when the pain becomes real enough that even the dumbest fox viewing motherfucker will rise up against the republicans who are screwing them over.  

      I onlly need to look at Wisconsin to get some faith.  Unfortunately it was too late to save that state and Russ Feingold last November but the people finally woke up from their stupor there.  

      This is your world These are your people You can live for yourself today Or help build tomorrow for everyone -8.75, -8.00

      by DisNoir36 on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:07:03 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Tax increases need to come from where (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      the money is - Wall Street. A modest transaction tax would make all the upset redux.

      Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - Abraham Lincoln

      by 4Freedom on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:46:22 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  It's baffling... but I can think of one ideology (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      PhilK, Nada Lemming

      that induces that kind of fact-free thinking: racism.

      I'll bet that if Obama were to propose "Medicare For All... White People" The Tea Puppets would be the first to sign up.

      If unions were closed to non-whites, there wouldn't be any right-to-work states.

      If public schools were segregated, folks would pay their taxes rather than screaming "taxed enough already" and then paying thousands to enroll their child in a "christian academy".

      Poor whites find common cause with the wealthy because "the government just takes money from white people and and gives it to the coloreds".

      We're now living in the era of "crypto-racism". The Tea Puppets are directing their rage against the institution that forced integration upon their parent's generation: government, and the federal government in particular.

      You won't get on television these days by yelling "Race-mixing!" on the steps of city hall. But if you yell "socialism!", Fox will be there to put you on prime-time.

      Have you noticed?
      Politicians who promise LESS government
      only deliver BAD government.

      by jjohnjj on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:59:14 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I understand you point, but whenever we on (0+ / 0-)

        Kos try to have any kind of honest discussion on race in our nation, it turns into the most horrifying disgusting pie fights of all.

        I'm one quarter Creole and 3/4 Irish, and all my life, I've adored every single person, regardless of who the hell they were/, straight, white, black, yellow, muslim, jews, I don't give a shit, I love all people....

        but for some reason, we just cannot seem to have a decent debate on this site, about these issues.  I wish it were not so.

        My own parents, LOL, used to wash our mouths out with soap, if we dared to speak ill of anyone different from I wish, so much, that we could have an honest discussion of President Obama's policies, as opposed to turning it all into this hateful pie fight race circular firing squad.  

        I believe what is really going on in our nation, is a result of what is called 'reactionary' politics, but not because of President Obama's race, (although that is a factor).  I believe the true factor is that we have lost all trust and accountability, and credibility in our government, and therefore, this reactionary backlash, is exactly the same way, that other hateful people such as Dick Army and Karl Rove, taped into hate or race, to present a deep backlash to the deep right, which is why we see people like Huckabee and Palin up front and center.

        That is why I find it so horrifying that people call Obama Hitler, or Socialist, when in fact, the opposite is true.  

        The Republicans like Army/Rove are so damned perverse, that they will repeat these lies over and over again, and project exactly who they really are onto President Obama, and the Democrats.  That is what is so sick about all this:  Reactionary politics are deadly.

        Ms. B.

        “I hope the two wings of the Democratic Party may flap together.” William Jennings Bryan

        by Badabing on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 09:08:17 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yes, exactly (0+ / 0-)

          They project who/what they really are onto the "other." Armey/Rove/ Limp, Becker are good at what they do. But they cannot be successful without a willing constituency. In a just universe, they will reap what they have sown.  Meanwhile, this country spirals down. WE must continue to pull in the other direction and strive to lift ALL boats anyway.    

      •  Medicare for All...White Million& Billionaires (0+ / 0-)

        Yes, we should take that incremental first step. What a novel way to expose  the horror and tragedy of DC. We should start a petition.

  •  Egypt (6+ / 0-)

    Because of policies of the past years---Egypt had a growing middle class and educated people.  However,  these new college grads or middle class ---many are jobless or under employed.  Because of technology cell phones, twitter facebook,  they are also more politically attuned. THey have time.  It is bad enough that Mubarak is there for 32 years but when he began positioning his son, plus stories of corruption.  There is underlying discontent.  ANd Tunisia happened.

    This is not a rebellion of the poor and impoverished.  The poor dont have time to think about politicians.  Or even have a cell phone, twitter, computers etc.  Poor uneducated masses will be attracted more on class warfare propaganda or extremist muslim rhetoric but not something about political democracy, etc. That is not their concern.  Their concern is food.

    Egypt is just similar to the Philippine Revolution in 1986.  The middleclass tolerated Marcos dictatorship for 20 plus years but when they learned he was very sick and that his wife and corrupt chief of staff and cronies are going to take over---that was overboard.  The Philippine revolution was not by the poor masses but by middle class and civil society. Enough is enough.

    Protect Democracy. Keep lying GOP out of the People's House.

    by timber on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 06:27:02 PM PST

  •  This is good. Quite long, (5+ / 0-)

    but good.

    Rubin is a thieving scumbag who owes the American people billions of dollars.  This is something he should take into account now in preparation for his future trial.

    Don't tell me what you do. Tell me whose interests you serve and I'll tell you what you do.

    by GiveNoQuarter on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 06:30:33 PM PST

  •  Thank you Ms B (7+ / 0-)

    We are looking at food that has "suddenly" become too expensive; in the not-too-distant future fresh water will become part and parcel of the problem.  Whether we like it or not, Climate Change is another facet in the whole process.  

    •  Not just food (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      bablhous, Badabing, Nailbanger

      Oil has been creeping up and even the dumbest right wing hicks in CT are starting to notice that it's getting expensive to fill up their pickups.

      Unfortunately they're too fucking dumb to realize it's the republicans fault that oil and gas prices are going up but at some point it will hit them.

      This is your world These are your people You can live for yourself today Or help build tomorrow for everyone -8.75, -8.00

      by DisNoir36 on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 07:09:35 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  No truer diary has yet been read by me (4+ / 0-)

    Premise 13.  Those in power rule by force, and the sooner we break ourselves of illusions to the contrary, the sooner we can at least begin to make reasonable decisions about whether, when, and how we are going to resist.

    skip the light fandango, turn cartwheels across the floor

    by radicalink on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 08:35:17 PM PST

  •  "toughness as a mask for theft" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    so much truth packed into so few words.

    no more "tough choices", mr president. not til the super-wealthy have to make similarly tough choices.

  •  I'm a huge fan of Matt Stoller, too. (0+ / 0-)

    Paul Rosenberg is another blogger from OpenLeft that I really appreciate.    I am sorry OL shut down.  The quality of that place with be missed.

    If you don't stand for something, eventually, you stand for nothing.

    by dkmich on Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 02:38:47 AM PST

    •  Read it all and RIGHT ON! (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      It is so important to follow the money in our current world situation.  I really feel like a lot of what plays out on MSM and the banter that we see between the parties is just the facade of difference and choice.  Both parties are beholden to their Plutocratic overlords and preserving the status quo.  

      The megatrends happending around the globe are best explained through the lens of the Shock Doctrine theory.  I encourage everyone to read it and re-read it.  

      And join the group "Shock Doctrine"

      Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed frequently ... and for the same reason

      by Road Dog on Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 12:11:59 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site