Skip to main content

The people in my evangelical church are worried about young people leaving and for good reason. In the book "American Grace", Putnam found this:

Young Americans are dropping out of religion at an alarming rate of 5-6 times the historic rate (30-40% have no religion today versus 5-10% a generation ago).  But youth’s religious disaffection is largely due to discomfort with religiosity having been tied to conservative politics.

A recent Pew Poll on budget priorities underscored the divide between the old and young in the church -- or more properly the young leaving the church. Note this isn't over the traditional social issues. This is over economic issues.

The following graphs illustrate the difference between evangelicals and non-evangelicals with respect to priorities for cutting the federal budget:



Christianity Today summarized the differences as follows:

The top choices among evangelicals for the chopping block are economic assistance to needy people around the world (56 percent), government assistance for the unemployed (40 percent), and environmental protection (38 percent). In each of these categories, evangelicals were more supportive of decreasing spending than are other Americans. In fact, evangelicals were more supportive of funding cuts in every area except military defense, terrorism defense, aid to veterans, and energy.

In general, Americans are more in favor of spending increases, not decreases. Evangelicals were more likely to favor an increase in defense spending (45 percent) compared to non-evangelicals (28 percent). The largest gap between the two groups, however, was in areas related to education, an area the House bill targets for some its largest cuts.

When asked about "public schools," evangelicals supported increasing funding (48 percent), but this was 10 points lower than others' support for schools (58 percent). When asked about education funding in general (just "education"), 68 percent of non-evangelicals support increased spending compared to only 35 percent of evangelicals. Gaps appeared in other education areas including college financial aid (47 percent to 15 percent) and scientific research (39 percent to 16 percent).

The priorities above are in total opposition of young evangelicals as I noted in my 2008 diary:

One thing of note is the high priority of poverty and environment for the Obama evangelicals. This is not surprising since this is the hallmark of young evangelicals.

Evangelical young people track young people as a whole except on the issue of abortion. (Their view here is complicated and defies easy categorization.) So, I'll use the break out of young people as a proxy for their position:


The gaps that Christianity Today found between evangelicals and non-evangelicals are even larger between evangelicals and the young. Education had a 37% gap between evangelicals and the young for INCREASING spending. College financial aid had a 42% gap. Scientific research had a 26% gap.

On the issues of poverty and the environment -- which are of particular interest to young evangelicals -- evangelicals were almost 20% more likely to want to cut such programs. I've heard the argument that by cutting government anti-poverty programs it will allow for private money to be available. Not so, says the largest evangelical anti-poverty charity, World Vision.

Washington D.C., February 15, 2011-- As the U.S. Congress votes this week on fiscal 2011 spending, the international Christian humanitarian organization World Vision calls on lawmakers to protect funding for life-saving and cost-effective development assistance programs. Disproportionately large cuts targeting America’s humanitarian assistance budget jeopardize the success of global development initiatives and undermine both U.S. global security and leadership.

Cuts proposed in the House of Representatives’ budget resolution include slashing U.S. food aid programs by 41 percent ($687 million), Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance funding by 67 percent ($875 million), development assistance by 30 percent ($747 million) and global health and childhood survival programs by 15 percent ($365 million), all from FY 2010 enacted levels, according to budget analyses.

“These cuts represent modest overall savings compared with other areas of the national budget and would cripple America’s ability to carry out its foreign policy objectives through humanitarian and development assistance,” said Adam Taylor, vice president of advocacy for World Vision in the U.S. “The U.S. has remained a clear global leader by maintaining a solid record of investment in efforts combating hunger, extreme poverty and illness.

Responsible stewardship of America’s budget in the face of real fiscal challenges requires smart thinking and an honest assessment of the impact of global and domestic investments. Cost-effective programs that have demonstrated results and advance critical U.S. interests – such as the success of the PEPFAR program, which has significantly reduced AIDS-related deaths in hard-hit countries – should not be subject to some of the largest cuts.

“Gutting funding to programs that have enjoyed broad bi-partisan support and receive widespread constituent support would undercut America’s moral credibility and put lives at risk. Keeping commitments fosters global respect and goodwill,” said Taylor.

World Vision is a global organization with one million American donors, representing every state and congressional district. Our constituency demonstrates every year that a broad base of U.S. voters and taxpayers prioritize development, feeding the hungry and protecting vulnerable lives enough to provide support from their own pockets – which the U.S. government can leverage through its continued leadership.

“World Vision recognizes the need to make tough decisions addressing the present fiscal crisis, including budget cuts, but these should not fall disproportionately on the poorest of the poor,” said Robert Zachritz, government relations director for World Vision in the U.S. “Congress is considering an overall budget reduction of 8.8 percent from the FY 2011 presidential request, with cuts disproportionately made to the most cost-effective humanitarian programs saving children’s lives. One would think on the day after Valentine’s Day, Congress would have more of a heart.”

“World Vision is calling attention to this because 8 million children die needlessly every year before the age of five and can’t speak up for themselves. These children could be saved with low-cost interventions like malaria bed nets or child immunizations,” said Zachritz. “As World Vision works on the frontlines of human needs in nearly 100 countries, we witness the positive impact these accounts make on the lives of the world’s most vulnerable people.”

What does this mean in terms of lives? According to

House cuts could mean:

3.7 million people won’t get tested for HIV this year

10.4 million bed nets won’t get to families to fight malaria

58,000 moms-to-be won’t receive the medicine to make sure their babies are born HIV-free

I suspect I will hear the argument that we should not run the church by public polling. I agree. So, what does Scripture say with respect to our priorities?

Ezekiel 16:49-50 Sodom's sins were pride, laziness, and gluttony, while the poor and needy suffered outside her door. She was proud and did loathsome things, so I wiped her out, as you have seen. (NLT)

Evangelicals have a choice. We can choose to listen to our young people who are voting with their feet in disgust with us or listen to the filthy lucre of the Koch brothers (cf. 1 Timothy 3:3, KJV). When the Apostle Peter was faced with a similar choice when Simon Magus wanted to buy influence with the church he said:

Acts 8:20-23 Peter answered: “May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.” (NIV)
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip and Rec from an atheist (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Statusquomustgo, Amber6541

    This is a crisis I knew had to come, Destroying the balance I'd kept. Doubting, unsettling and turning around, Wondering what will come next.
    --Ian Curtis

    by jethrock on Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 11:27:06 AM PST

  •  What this does not do (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Statusquomustgo, millwood

    is control for the geographical concentration of evangelicals in the South.

    Is the South conservative because of evangelicals? Or are evangelicals conservative because they are in the South? Or some of both?

    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; but in practice, there always is a difference. - Yogi Berra

    by blue aardvark on Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 11:27:45 AM PST

    •  being on the Missouri/Kansas border (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      A Voice, pittie70

      evangelicals are assholes no matter where they are....
      sadly, that is why avoiding religion like the plague is
      a necessity for my sanity.  The mega churches are even
      worse.  blech....

      It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. Ansel Adams -6.5 -6.75

      by Statusquomustgo on Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 11:43:58 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Two Book Recommendations (0+ / 0-)

      On the right religion and politics are inextricably linked. There are two books I recommend to unwind the mutual influences on each other:

      1. American Grace
      2. From the Bible Belt to the Sun Belt

      The first book contends that the nexus between the two was because starting in the 70s there was a choice concerning abortion and gays with respect to the two parties and people started self sorting. There wasn't much politics preached from the pulpits but rather the social networks that churches provide bred right-wing echo chambers.

      The second book is more pertinent to those of us in Colorado. It was a history of evangelicals moving from the western South to Southern California in the post-war years. The anti-communist fervor in the 40s and 50s bred the Religious Right and also (!) the anti-tax libertarianism inside the evangelical church. (George Pepperdine of Pepperdine University and the Western Auto fortune successfully argued you needed low taxes so people could donate to religious schools.) Many of the Religious Right organizations (e.g. Focus on the Family) moved from Southern California to Colorado Springs.

  •  So this is about...? (0+ / 0-)
    World Vision calls on lawmakers to protect funding for life-saving and cost-effective development assistance programs. Disproportionately large cuts targeting America’s humanitarian assistance budget jeopardize the success of global development initiatives and undermine both U.S. global security and leadership.

    Development?  US Global security?  We're number one!?! These are the motives? For Christians? Not compassion for the insecure, but to keep them from threatening our security?  Not love for humanity, but love for leading them?  I am not surprised that young people are leaving the church.  Of course, that may be because I did and for the same reasons.

    It doesn't seem to me that Christians can figure out what to believe, let alone why they believe.

    Fools are the teachers of the wise. It is foolish to disrespect one's teachers. - Old Man

    by A Voice on Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 12:56:26 PM PST

    •  It's Understanding Your Audience (0+ / 0-)

      They know that some lawmakers value security over compassion. It's more a commentary on how far the Congress has moved in the wrong direction than on WV itself. Note an equivalent appeal in 2004:


      The Global U.S. Department of Agriculture Food for Education program, begun in May of 2001, was designed by former senators George McGovern and Robert Dole to offer food to children provided that they attend school. The intent was to motivate parents to send both sons and daughters to school, particularly in countries like Afghanistan, where girls are often prevented from accessing even what meager educational opportunities exist in their communities. Since 2001, the program budget has been cut from $300 million to just $50 million for 2004. As a result, the number of children benefiting from the program has decreased from 7 million in 2001 to 1 million in 2004.

      Currently, World Vision is helping some 37,000 schoolchildren through this program in Afghanistan. Through private funding, World Vision also provides these children with school supplies and clothes, as well as constructing new school buildings and helping parents raise vegetables to supplement family diets and help support their children’s teachers.

      “This program is giving thousands of children the opportunity to go to school, and the nutrition they need to concentrate in class,” said World Vision communications manager Geno Teofilo. “This is a pivotal moment in Afghanistan’s history; these programs are vital to inspiring hope for a better future.”

  •  Looking for the goods... or link. (0+ / 0-)

    In the book "American Grace", does anyone know the source that Putnam attributes to the diary's following quote?

    Young Americans are dropping out of religion at an alarming rate of 5-6 times the historic rate (30-40% have no religion today versus 5-10% a generation ago).  But youth’s religious disaffection is largely due to discomfort with religiosity having been tied to conservative politics.


    by FakeNews on Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 05:56:50 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site