Skip to main content

Nobody asked me, but...

As I was watching the Academy Awards ceremony, a predictably dull affair despite the best efforts of brilliant actors but amateur hosts James Franco and Anne Hathaway, I couldn't help wondering what--for the umpteenth time--was going wrong.  It's not as if something going wrong was such a shock; something is always going wrong with the Oscars broadcast.  Sometimes it is far worse than others.  (Witness the David Letterman or Chris Rock fiascos.)  This time...well, it was an ill-conceived experiment gamely played out by a couple of strong performers despite a complete lack of quality material handed to them by the writers.

Follow me across the orange swirly thingie and I'll talk about why.

Hathaway and Franco are not comedians.  They are not trained at improvisation.  They are actors--and damned fine ones--whose job it is to create characters from scripted words.  If only someone had thought to give them some decent scripted words to play with...but no: from the start, the writing was derivative, lame, pandering, and just plain unfunny.  OK, it's cool to put the hosts in a Best Picture montage, but it's been done about a million times before.  And the sheer gratuitousness of the "Back to the Future" sequence destroyed any hope for continuity that the montage ever had (if the "brown duck" dance had not already done so).  And was there a single remotely humorous line in the monologue?  These writers had months to come up with this stuff and the best they could do was to have Hathaway's mom correct her posture and Franco's grandmother ogle "Marky Mark"?

If the writing elsewhere in the show had gotten any better, this weak opening might have been forgivable--sort of--but it simply didn't.  I need offer only one simple bit of evidence to prove my point: Franco in a Marilyn Monroe dress for no discernible reason.  The hosts simply never had a chance.  And on top of that, someone got the brilliant idea that Franco should be tweeting and video-blogging from backstage during the entire live show.  Anyone wonder why he looked a bit distracted?  Anyone wonder why Hathaway needed to be über-perky to pick up the slack?

From Bizarro-World presenter dialogue to bits that clearly did not work (I understand Shrek was supposed to present an animation award) to the unexplained notion to split the Best Song performances in half (leaving the audience utterly confused) to the Best Picture montage that seemed weirdly to presume a victory for "The King's Speech," this was a ceremony that just made no sense at all.  Not only that, but there were absolutely no surprises: everything that was supposed to win won.  If it were not for the wonderful human moments (Kirk Douglas and his wonderful sense of humor, Luke Matheny, the winner of the Best Live Action Short, walking up to the microphone with his head of unruly hair and saying "I should have gotten a haircut," both writing award winners' brilliant speeches, Colin Firth's and Tom Hooper's heartfelt moments, Randy Newman's hilarious rant, Charles Ferguson of "Inside Job" calling out the fact that no one responsible for the economic collapse has yet gone to prison,  Cate Blanchette's "Gross!" upon seeing the "The Wolfman" makeup that would take home an award, Christian Bale's sincere (and grownup) speech, Sandra Bullock's lively Best Actor introductions, Steven Spielberg's reminder that the Best Picture "losers" would be in the company of pictures like "Raging Bull" and "Citizen Kane") there would have been nothing to watch for.

So, after a night when pretty much everything that could go wrong for Oscar did (including major category victories--yet again--by films that have been seen by about ten people each), how can we look ahead and try to fix this dinosaur of a ceremony as it moves into its 84th year?

Tell you what we don't do: let's not "go for the younger demographic."  That's called "pandering," and the "younger demographic" recognizes it in about a half a second and tunes out.  So, assuming that we cannot simply rehire Billy Crystal to a lifetime contract (and I think anyone who watched the other night would agree that this would be a great idea), where do we begin?

Let's begin with the one thing this year's producers got right: the elimination of the "applause-o-meter" from the "In Memoriam" section, which has always been about the tackiest thing about the Oscars.  Of course, the utterly random order in which the deceased stars were presented just made the whole thing rather confusing...

OK, another thing they did right: eliminated time-wasting "tribute" montages.  Good for them.

After that, well, since they didn't do much else right, we're free to play.  So let's think way outside the box.

Open the evening with a montage of the ten movies up for Best Picture.  Let's see what the evening is all about, right from the beginning: we're here to celebrate the best of the best in motion pictures from this year.  I'm not talking about a silly joking montage; I'm talking about a serious one, the kind usually saved for near the end.  This is the story of the night.  Lead with it.

After the montage, let the host enter.  The host should be someone who is an actor/comedian with improv training.  He or she should have multiple talents, including the ability to sing, and should be able to help write the show to have a greater stake in his or her performance.  The monologue should acknowledge the year in film: the great and the not so great.  It should not pander to the lowest common denominator.  This is Hollywood's greatest night.  Make fun of the bad movies, sure.  But save the psycho Charlie Sheen jokes for another venue.

The Awards:  This is critically important.  The Academy needs to rethink the awards themselves.  First, it needs to rethink which awards are presented in prime time.  This has been done before; there is precedent.  Second, it needs to consider changing, deleting, and adding awards to its list.  It's about time: the list has been fundamentally unchanged for most of the Oscars' existence, with only some technical awards being added (and Best Animated Feature).

Change:  All categories  Refine rules to clarify that, if fewer than five eligible films exist, fewer than five nominations wil be made.  (Already the case in some categories.)

Change:  All categories  Refine rules so that a sixth nominee may be added if the voting between #'s 5 and 6 is extremely close.  This adds a bit of unexpected flair to certain races.

Delete:  Best Song  I know: it's sacrilege.  And we'd lose Randy Newman.  But this category (Best Song composed for a film, musical, or television program) belongs in the Grammy's.

Delete:  Short Films  Not from the awards, but from prime time.  No one has seen these things.  We should have, but we haven't.  And we won't.  So give the awards out some other time and place.

Recombine: Sound Editing and Sound Mixing back to Sound.  Seriously.  Does a split in these awards ever even occur?

Add:  Best Title Sequence  They do it at the Emmy's.  (This idea is not originally mine, but I have lost the link where I first saw it.  It's a good one though; these folks work hard and sometimes make mini-movies.)

The Show:  Without Best Song, random montages, and several awards that no one in the television audience knows anything about or cares anything about, the broadcast will tighten up considerably.  Allow the host to return throughout the show to do brief monologues; otherwise keep the pace moving.  Let the presenters (I know this is going to be a really crazy concept) present the awards instead of wasting everyone's time with allegedly witty banter that usually falls flat anyway.  A brief discussion of the importance of, say, art direction, and we're off to the races.

Keep the show about the movies.  Keep the things we see on TV about the movies.  Let us see stars.  Let us see clips of great performances.  When we get the Best Actor/Actress, consider giving us a comparison: show us a tape from an early rehearsal to compare with the actual performance.  Won't we all be impressed and amazed by what these people can do to mere words from a page?

And when we finally get to Best Picture (much earlier than usual because this show has hummed along), we've already had our major montage (back at the start, remember?) so we can do something completely new.  Maybe we could create a clever new kind of montage out of single lines from all ten films interwoven together.  Or maybe...we could just give out the award and finish the program.  Whatever.  But I'll bet this Oscars broadcast is about a hundred times better appreciated than the one last Sunday.

(It would also help if, you know, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2" were up for Best Picture.  Can we arrange that?)  :-)

Originally posted to sunspark says on Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 09:35 PM PST.

Also republished by Seriously Seeking Cinema and Electronic America: Progressives Film, music & Arts Group.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    Behind every successful woman is a substantial amount of coffee. ~Stephanie Piro

    by sunspark says on Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 09:35:19 PM PST

    •  I think your suggestions are good ones. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      sunspark says

      I watched and thought it was about the worst Oscars ceremony that I've seen yet. Just terrible. And you rightly point out that the only saving grace for the show were the bits here and there by some of  the winners and presenters. I felt like so much of it was just a tired, half-hearted attempt to put on a show. So trite. So unfunny. So awful. I heard a point made by someone who said that the Oscars should be wonderful! This is what they do! Entertain! How can they fail so miserably year after year to do just that with their awards ceremony? Pretty inexcusable, in my opinion.

  •  Okay, well I didn't watch... (3+ / 0-)

    but I think it's sort of strangely nice that you care enough to write all this about it, so I'll contribute. I have watched some of it some other years...

    I like the addition of a titles award. Definitely.

    I think the should stop with the sexist order of things - what, people will turn it off early if they award the Best Actor before the Best Actress? Bah. Mix that shit up.

    I think it would be more interesting if the nominees were kept secret until the presentation. Might be two or three people missing, but so what. It's boring that the winners are so predictable by the time of the show.

  •  Hey, while we're adding our 2 cents. (4+ / 0-)

    I thought Chris Rock was a good host. the show is tooooooo long. I would be happy if they cut out of the songs. And the movie montages, except for the films being nominated. Cutting lesser known awards might be a good idea.

    "Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing." - Thomas Paine

    by blueoregon on Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 10:36:12 PM PST

  •  I won't watch even on DVR. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Way too slow for me but if they incorporated some of your ideas I would be more inclined to watch.

    "The human eye is a wonderful device. With a little effort, it can fail to see even the most glaring injustice." Richard K. Morgan

    by sceptical observer on Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 10:58:58 PM PST

  •  I agree about Harry Potter n/t (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 11:34:25 PM PST

  •  One thing that really got me was (3+ / 0-)

    When they brought out the three old guys after talking about a few of the things they'd done, and they weren't allowed to speak and they weren't given an award.  

    I was REALLY mad at this year's Grammy's when they gave a Lifetime Achievement Award to Dolly Parton and didn't even have a single clip of her 50 year career or mention of all the awards, gold and platinum records and general awesomeness that is Dolly.  

    Also, you don't cut back to a singer in the middle of the In Memorium section.  That was in really poor taste.  That said, they need to keep that section.  

    I agree on the titles too.  

    I'd also like to see a category for Best Hair and Makeup.  Seriously.  And Best Documentary- short and long form.  

  •  Nah. Know what'd really help? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sunspark says

    Actually only voting for the real best movies of the year. I stopped watching the Oscar broadcasts after 1996, when the worst movie of that and probably many other years, The English Patient, swept all the awards. They need to stop voting for their friends, or their studio, and vote for the actual best moviemaking of the year...regardless of whether it's a Hollywood project or not.

    I'd watch if it wasn't so obviously a popularity contest. But it is. Fuck that.

    "This is about the human heart, and if that sounds corny, so be it." -- Keith Olbermann

    by allergywoman on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 12:10:30 AM PST

  •  This diary needs more... (0+ / 0-)

    ... Charlie Sheen.

    Did you hear he's losing custody of his kids?

    Corporate Dog

    We didn't elect Obama to be an expedient president. We elected him to be a great one. -- Eugene Robinson

    by Corporate Dog on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 04:21:44 AM PST

  •  This diary is an excellent of example of why we (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sunspark says, foufou

    need more diversity in the newsrooms of America. Astounding that you (and others) watched the Oscars and came away thinking that those areas you mentioned were the only - or even the biggest - problem with this august institution.
    How about the total lack of appreciation for the talents of brown and black people?
    Or the almost total dominance of the actors from another country, Great Britain? White actors from Great Britain.
    Can people of color act, write, direct or produce?

    Maya Angelou: "Without courage, we cannot practice any other virtue with consistency. We can't be kind, true, merciful, generous, or honest."

    by JoanMar on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 05:26:00 AM PST

    •  oh i agree completely! but... (0+ / 0-)

      how does one institutionalize that particular issue?  you can't exactly create a quota of nominees of color.  the fact that there were absolutely none this year (or most years) is a travesty.

      Behind every successful woman is a substantial amount of coffee. ~Stephanie Piro

      by sunspark says on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 06:01:19 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  great suggestions (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    definitely needs more zip. The thing that got me was when the two hosts bantered about appealing to a younger demographic. UGH... awful.

    Truth is harmonious, lies are discordant.

    by Babsnc on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 05:26:09 AM PST

  •  Bring back Letterman (0+ / 0-)

    He's the best Oscar host they ever had (well, in the modern post-Bob Hope era).

    All kidding aside - it's the f'ing oligarchy, stupid.

    by nightsweat on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 07:19:35 AM PST

  •  Oscar should have a sex change (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sunspark says

    I think the Oscars would be vastly improved if they made my daughter(center) the Oscar statue!

    She is Oscar!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site