Skip to main content

Twenty-first Century Republican office holders are not real Republicans.  They're not modest. They're not competent. They're not generous, either with time or talents. They're not honest as the day is long. They're not the salt of the earth.  So, I, for one have had difficulty even referring to them as Republicans.  

When they refer to themselves as conservatives, it helps.  For, there is some truth in that claim.  Twenty-first Century conservatives are keen on conserving something.  They're just not keen on admitting that what they want to preserve is the ability to rule the American people without contradiction and without opposition from the ruled (even if that means keeping the unruly from becoming full-fledged American citizens in the first place). So, the Conservative moniker effectively perpetrates a deception and that argues against its use.

I've tried referring to these punitive petty potentates springing up all across the country as deprivators, 'cause that's what these pols are after -- depriving other people, including their own constituents, of their human and civil rights.  But, "deprivator" isn't even a word that most dictionaries recognize.  Which is sort of strange, unless you consider that

"If you can't say something nice about people, don't say anything at all"

applies to dictionaries, as well as the people who read them.  Besides, novelty distracts from a message.  So, new wine in old bottles is actually a good idea, if the idea is to get people to try it.  It's not a guarantee that they'll like it, as the Coca Cola company discovered right quickly with its substitute for the classic stuff, but the familiar does smooth the introduction. It's only later that familiarity breeds contempt, especially when the new stuff turns out to be a fraud.

"Contemptible Republicans"  Now, that's a moniker that's accurate, as far as it goes.  But, that's the problem.  "Contemptible Republicans" describes them from a possible reaction one might have to some of their behavior, but it isn't necessarily so.  The most generous among us can put up with a lot of low-down behavior and typically do.  Calling them contemptible is about equivalent to a shoulder shrug and giving them the brush off.brush

What we need is a designation that tells what this new breed of politician is about.  For the moment, IOU Republicans strikes me as about just right. I don't know if they introduced them, but Republicans themselves have been obviously fond of acronyms for at least four decades, culminating with perhaps the most cynical piece of legislation ever, the USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism), a euphemistic moniker for spying on people and prying into their private lives.

What the IOU stands for is appropriately fungible.  Whether

I is for incompetent, intransigent, incoherent, insolent, independent, and
O is for obsessive, obstructive, outrageous, over-reaching, obnoxious, or
U is for uncooperative, unwelcome, unaware, untrustworthy, etc.

depends on the eye of the beholder.  On the other hand, the acronym as a whole pretty much describes the "I own you" attitude of this new breed of politician, as well as the habit of handing out IOUs that never get paid.  Which suggests that perhaps Outlaw is their middle name, except for the fact that they're rather clever about twisting the law to serve their conniving ends.

Predators are clever.  All of Aesop's fables of the fox tell us so.  They also tell us that competence gets tricked into providing assistance, where none is deserved, and then lay the blame on pride.  But really, just as the old adage, to say nothing when a good word can't be said, is only valid when all the people are trustworthy and kind, predatory people can't be left alone.  Predatory people are like drunks and have to be stopped, not helped.  In fact, when faced with abuse and deprivation, for authority to stand silent is to become complicit -- a truth, one hopes, that's finally been recognized and prompted the intervention in Libya.

Predators are also fearful.  Having given offense, they expect revenge and that makes them even more offensive.  All the more reason for why they have to be stopped.  There is no compromising with IOU Republicans.  Especially not when it's other people's rights that are being weighed in the bargain.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    http://www.youtube.com/cyprespond

    by hannah on Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 06:28:09 AM PDT

  •  You always make me think more..lol (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    liz dexic

    "Time is for careful people, not passionate ones."

    by roseeriter on Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 06:54:02 AM PDT

  •  Try cheap-labor conservatives (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    liz dexic

    or cheap-labor Republicans

    http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/...

    I'm running for office! Donate now: http://tinyurl.com/al4sterling

    by Alfonso Nevarez on Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 07:30:07 AM PDT

    •  Certainly, they're cheap. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GAladybug, liz dexic

      But, there's more to it, I think.  There's an actual pleasure in inflicting hurt.  
      Various kinds of exploitation have been endemic in the EuroAmerican conquest of the continent.  Not just people, but mother nature are presumable available for the taking without giving anything in return.
      To a large extent, this attitude is affirmed by the elevation of property rights over the rights of natural persons and, for that matter, all of organic existence.  A claim of ownership makes man king and the idea resonates with many people -- witness the popularity of the ownership society proclaimed by Dubya and now exposed as fraudulent.  
      That's the only positive about making material objects supreme--their flaws are very difficult to hide.  Even paper-work is difficult to misidentify, if people are willing to look.  Electronic records, one suspects, were supposed to correct for that problem.
      But, in their haste, they forgot to change the law.

      http://www.youtube.com/cyprespond

      by hannah on Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 07:46:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site