Skip to main content

Republicans worry that we're spending too much on school teachers and snow plow drivers.  If the motion presented today in Madison by J.B. Van Hollen's flunkies is any indication, I worry that we're wasting money on barely-competent lawyers.

More below....

Van Hollen and his dimwitted elves have been repeating this line ad nauseum for weeks.  They contend that Judge Sumi doesn't have the authority to block Walker's Union-Busting Bill because a 1943 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling declared that lower courts cannot rule on the constitutionality of a law until it actually becomes the law.  Taken to its idiotic conclusion, they're trying to argue that the court cannot interfere with the legislative process for any purpose.

I'll try to be plain here, because some asshat from Van Hollen's office might be reading this:  Judge Sumi is not reviewing the constitutionality of the law. She's reviewing whether the Republicans violated the Open Meetings Act, which would nullify the law whether it's constitutional or not.  Do you understand? Were you sick that day in law school when they discussed...you know....law?

Given that the Open Meetings Act came after the 1943 ruling, it's altogether appropriate for Judge Sumi to review whether the law was violated, and it would be certainly a matter for the Wisconsin Supreme Court to determine when and where the lower courts can become involved.  This is how the legal system works in a civilized society.  You're not living in Medieval Europe.  Sorry.

As to the argument that the court does not have the authority to review acts of the State Assembly because the judicial system is a separate branch of government, I can only conclude that you're all other dumber than a sack of hammers or that you're....oh fuck it.  You're just dumber than a sack of hammers.

Just to review.  There are three branches of government, and each has checks and balances against the other.  The fact that the Wisconsin State Senate has gleefully handed over large chunks of its senatorial privilege to the governor notwithstanding, it doesn't follow that the judicial branch would be eager to do the same.  So you'll just have to excuse Judge Sumi for thinking that the rule of law still applies.

This is the best they've got? These weak-assed arguments only prove that this is going all the way to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which is going to be lacking one conservative member after next Tuesday.

Originally posted to Jeff in Milwaukee on Fri Apr 01, 2011 at 10:45 AM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive, ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement, and Progressive Hippie.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site