Skip to main content

Government proclaims that all people are entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, to freedom of speech and religion, and freedom from want and fear. But while proclaiming these individual rights, it does little to promote them beyond making laws that attempt to protect individuals from social infringement upon these rights.

While acknowledging these individual rights to life and to freedom from want and fear, government acts as if it is powerless to give more than token help in promoting them.

Government recognizes these rights but fails to acknowledge that they require money for their fulfillment. Individual rights require not only constitutional proclamation and/or legal support, but also money to sustain them, so government acknowledgment of rights is for the most part half-baked.

A person who is unemployed due to downsizing, disability or other reasons will not be free from want and fear. People who have lost their homes in the Great Recession will not be free from want and fear. Sick people who cannot afford medical care will not be free from want and fear. And the entitlements of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness will be slipping from their grasp.

This discussion could move in many directions vis-a-vis resolutions of these problems, but let us focus upon only one for now:


It is horrifying to find in reading the literature of economics that

unemployment came to be used as a policy tool. That is, unemployment was not a  problem to be tackled by government policy, No, unemployment became the policy  tool to deal with the supposed problem of inflation. So, policy actually was targeting  unemployment, using that to keep inflation rates low.
The quote is from L. Randall Wray, Modern Monetary Theorist.

So government numerologists / economists, far from promoting the rights of citizens, were actually promoting the loss of rights for many unlucky citizens. These people were simply collateral damage in the war against the "supposed problem of inflation."

To eliminate unemployment, a federal Job Guarantee is proposed by Modern Monetary Theory thinkers, and explained most recently here by maddogg:

So how will a Job Guarantee achieve both full employment and price stability?  Well, first of all, it will, by definition, eliminate unemployment.  Everyone who is ready, willing, and able to work will be able to get a job that is funded by the federal government.  That pretty much wipes out unemployment as we currently define it.  Of course, there will be some people who refuse the job offer because they'd rather spend time looking for higher paying work.  There may be others who refuse to work at the set wage.  That's fine.  The program is meant to be completely voluntary.
Participating in a voluntary Job Guarantee program at a minimum wage would have the advantage not only of providing income, but also of easing the way into a regular private-sector job by ensuring a continuous-work history and additional job experience.

How the government could advance such a program is explained at the link above. I recommend that diary highly. It also contains important links to other explanations and to the other concepts of Modern Monetary Theory, the up-and-coming viewpoint on economics that lays low the specters of austerity, debt limits and other frightening creatures of the night called up by conservative / corporatist economic "thinkers".

Please follow our group, Money and Public Purpose (here), as we continue to pursue a strong effort to bring MMT to the attention of everyone who can possibly support it.

Thank you for reading and reccing.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site