Skip to main content

We progressives are bloodhounds when it comes to treeing DLC-style capitulation, incrementalism,  "pragmatism". And that's a good thing, because Lord knows we'd be even further right if it weren't for the pushback we do provide. But, truth be told, we progressives succumb to the same weaknesses and defeatism we decry in the centrists. As distressed as we are about The Class War, for example, we place incredible constraints on what we are willing to do about it.

There's a lot of great reporting, information and editorializing on DKos. Even some of the "debates" are valuable. But there is precious little on the topic of organizing to bring about real, assured change.  As with the centrists, we progressives engage in our own forms of denialism, settling for running the same wheel every day, never any closer to real, substantive change.
I've seen the following quote (paraphrased?) around DKos lately:

"Don't tell me what you believe. Tell me what you do and I'll tell you what you believe."

True. Soon enough, a budget will be "done". And with that budget we can judge what its compilers and negotiators "believe". Basically, that there is nothing for it but to cave to the plutocrats, with the assistance of the tea party surrogates they've funded. Likewise, there is progressive activism being "done". And from the collective results of those efforts we can tell what progressives, as a whole, really believe. Basically, progressives demonstrate that they believe that there is nothing for it but to cave to the plutocracy, that the cost of not caving is too great for them, that others will have to pay an even higher cost later, when the obstacles will be even greater, the odds even longer.

Fortunately, there is at least one way to effectively deal with The Class War. (And more here.) As you can imagine, it is not easy. The opposition is both powerful and determined. What we have on our side is not only the truth and justice, which unfortunately are not enough, but large numbers. But it means we need some progressive opinion leaders to accept responsibility, not for all of us, but at least for themselves, and to lend their voices, street cred and networks to the effort. (And I just don't see that on DKos yet.) And then of course these leaders need to see a rapid groundswell of support to actually get the mountain of work involved done.

After eight years of Bush, we were able to do it to get Obama elected. Will we have to wait for another eight-year stretch of Republican extremism to mount another great offensive for progressivism, or can we act on the knowledge that, Democratic representation in D.C. or not, we can't get where we need to go from here. Not with this system. Can we do it without the centrists, who will no doubt fight us tooth and nail?

There may be other ways of achieving assured, substantive change. I can't identify them and I've tried. I don't mean more of the same tired approaches that have contributed to getting us into this mess. If we can say that supply-side economics has failed, and it we sure as hell can, then we can also say, unequivocally, that DLC political strategy has failed equally spectacularly. And "more and better Democrats" in a captive system won't work, either. In this system, the plutocrats will never need to purchase more than a small minority of votes to swing an outcome.

We need a completely new approach and one that we can envision producing assured success. No more methods for change we can't believe in. What's the point of that?

But having a solution is not the same as solving the problem, especially when so few are willing to pay the price. The failure of moral imagination on the part of progressives to undertake our responsibility to bring about the real change our representatives will not pursue is, like centrist pragmatism, just denialism, defeatism. There is an assumption that, practically speaking, nothing more can be done. Either we accept small increments of progress or, more frequently, no progress at all. Mostly, we accept failure, backsliding, as the social safety nets are unwound. And it is someone else's fault. The administration. Congress. Republicans.

Sorry, I don't believe it's anyone else's fault anymore. We always knew what we could expect from Republicans. Now that we know what we can expect from a Democratic Presidency and Congressional majority, it's our responsibility to roll with those punches and come up with a new strategy, one we believe will actually work.

Republicans pursue a "devil take the hindmost" policy on principle. We progressives accept the same policy by default, by blaming others and engaging in denialism, by not pursuing assured, substantive change.

Personally, I am beyond supporting this President, this Party to the degree I have in the past. As the old saw goes, I didn't leave the Party, the Party left me. Increment by increment. I will not be voting for this President or for any Democrats who are not fully committed to representing average people and the Democratic platform. If it is considered "purity" to demand Democrats fight against plutocrats raping and pillaging the country through the financial sector as well as government, then so be it. I am a proud purist. I will not be contributing to or participating in their campaigns. My money will go to  Kucinich, Weiner, Sanders.
Centrists will please themselves with blaming me for any Republicans who win, conveniently sloughing off responsiblity for the failings of  DLC politics, which is really what is representing "us" on the ballot. Since centrists are so loyal to Republican Lite, they need to take responsibility for its performance at the ballot box.
If it comes to it, I'll gamble on more Republican extremism rather than DLC capitulation as a surer, faster path to progress.

What I would do is wholeheartedly support with time and money a plan for assured success. But because that plan, by definition, requires strength in numbers, I won't be marching in an army of one. One person can champion the plan. Others can encourage it. But ultimately a great many of us, including some DKos leaders, must embrace it.

In lieu of any other credible solutions, what exactly will it take for a critical mass of people to take responsibility for real change? I shudder to think. How about you?

Originally posted to Words In Action on Mon Apr 11, 2011 at 08:53 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

Poll

I think

75%9 votes
0%0 votes
8%1 votes
16%2 votes

| 12 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site