Skip to main content

There were a few excellent diaries written this past week that I wanted to highlight for their incisive and informative analysis of issues pertaining to civil liberties and human rights abuses.  Judging by the small number of comments in each of them, these diaries have received only a small amount of attention by the community to date, but I think they're very much worth reading.  I've picked out a few key passages that illustrate the challenges surrounding the war on terror and our government's response to it, but I strongly recommend reading each of them in their entirety.

On Tuesday, kgosztola wrote a very comprehensive review of juvenile prisoners at Guantanamo and their struggle for due process in The Guantanamo Children: These Aren't What You'd Call "Little League" Terrorists:

The most well known juvenile detainee to be imprisoned at Guantanamo is Omar Ahmed Khadr. His assessment report  from January 2004 explains the reason for his continued detention was because “his father is a senior Al-Qaida financier and reportedly the fourth in command underneath Usama Bin Laden in the Al-Qaida organization.” His brother and him were encouraged to go to Afghanistan and fight the US with the support of Al-Qaida and the Taliban. And, according to JTF-GTMO, though just sixteen years old at the time of his travel, he is “intelligent and educated and understands the gravity of his actions and affiliations.” And, he admitted to participating in mining operations and “harassing attacks” against US forces.

This assessment stands in stark contrast to then-UN Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict Radhika Coomaraswamy’s contention that Khadr is a child soldier whom the US should help rehabilitate.

“Like other children abused by armed groups around the world who are repatriated to their home communities and undergo re-education for their reintegration, Omar should be given the same protections afforded these children…Trying young people for war crimes with regard to acts committed when they are minors could create a dangerous international precedent.”

On Wednesday, Daphne Eviatar Human Rights 1st continued with the theme of denying due process but focused new revelations from WikiLeaks and Bagram detainees in Wikileaks Documents Reveal Hazards of Blindly Relying on Secret Evidence:

The U.S. military holds some 1700 detainees at a prison on the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan - nearly ten times as many as remain at Guantanamo. But unlike at Guantanamo, prisoners in Afghanistan don't have the right to legal representation or to challenge or even to see the secret evidence being used against them.

Unfortunately, as the latest set of documents revealed by Wikileaks demonstrates, the military's ability or willingness to truly vet its secret informant evidence does not inspire confidence. The result is that we may well be imprisoning the wrong people.

Finally, earlier today, TOM ANDREWS wrote Like the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars? You'll LOVE This!, an analysis of legislation proposed in the Senate by John McCain and in the House by Buck McKeon (R-CA) that would expand the government's power to wage war and hold terrorism suspects indefinitely.  Tom says of the twin bills:

It is arguably the greatest ceding of unchecked authority to the Executive Branch in modern history. Not only would this bill abdicate Congress’ authority to declare war, it would relieve the Administration of the need to seek Congressional resolutions of support or authorizations for new military actions.

But wait, there’s more! In addition to providing a blank check for war, the proposed legislation would give the president dangerous new powers to detain anyone suspected of links to terrorism (the ostensible purpose of the legislation, titled the “Detainee Security Act of 2011”). It requires that all suspects be held by the military (unless the Defense Secretary grants a waiver), and either tried by military commission or held indefinitely.

Raha Wala at Human Rights First has more on the draconian McCain/McKeon legislation.

One thing I would add to this particular discussion: McKeon's bill would prohibit detainees from being transferred "to a country or entity if there is a confirmed case of an individual being transferred there who subsequently engaged in terrorist activity."  Basically, if a Guantanamo detainee, locked up for years and brutalized in detention, is finally released to his home country but then decides to take vengeance on the United States for his treatment in Guantanamo, that would prevent all detainees from being released to the same country in the future, even if they are innocent of all charges.  The bill does include language that would allow Robert Gates (or Leon Panetta, after he's sworn in as the new Defense Secretary) to waive that provision, but it's clear that the measure is designed to broaden the scope by which prisoners can be held in indefinite detention without trials.

In addition, McKeon's legislation doesn't narrowly define "terrorist activity," so it's quite possible that when deciding if a particular country is now off-limits for releasing detainees, the bill's proponents are seeking to include almost any activity that could be construed as aiding and abetting terrorists -- like working as a cameraman for Al Jazeera, which got Sami al-Hajj locked up in Guantanamo for six years.

Once again, I encourage others to read these three diaries that unfortunately did not get more traction upon publication.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks (7+ / 0-)

    I miss a lot during the week and I haven't set up a decent tags thing yet.

    Education is too big to fail. Truth is too big to fail. Justice is too big to fail. Peace is too big to fail.

    by Burned on Thu Apr 28, 2011 at 06:17:49 PM PDT

  •  Tom Andrew's diary (5+ / 0-)

    someone should front page that.

    Education is too big to fail. Truth is too big to fail. Justice is too big to fail. Peace is too big to fail.

    by Burned on Thu Apr 28, 2011 at 06:33:06 PM PDT

  •  Good stuff (6+ / 0-)

    I didn't know you were doing this.  I think it is a fantastic idea.  These issues get far too little attention and they should be high on our list of priorities.

    Thanks.

    •  well, it's just something I wanted to do today. (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      geomoo, joanneleon, Vtdblue, papicek

      I don't know if I'd make it a regular feature of my own, though I'd certainly be interested in a Human Rights Diary Rescue series.

      I just wanted to bring these diaries up for discussion because I thought each of them were very good, touched on similar issues, and were all posted within a day of each other.

  •  I am so discouraged by the lack of interest (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    zett, Lujane, SuperBowlXX, papicek

    in these issues.  After reading the heartbreaking Facebook chat between Adam Winfield and his father, I had hopes of bringing some attention to his situation, thinking publicity may pressure the military to take into account the fact that he clearly wanted to report the war criminality which he was eventually involved in.  I contacted his lawyer to find what sort of coverage would be most useful to his client.  My diary on the topic did make the rec list, but the comments section was dominated by self-centered arguing over Obama and such.  There seemed to be only a few people left who could even think seriously about this suffering--it had all become politics and nothing more.  I realized that even this community was going to pay little attention to the fate of yet another young man whose life will likely be ruined, sacrificed to the illusions of the "war on terror."

    I'm not giving up--working on another diary now--but I am resigned to very little serious discussion of these issues.  The first time I managed to get the attention of this community over war crimes was during the Bush administration; I was so upset that I used a tactic I'm not fond of--I used a shaming dairy title to draw attention to Congressional testimony which had been diaried by Tahoebasha but largely ignored.

    My overall point is that we are all complicit--arguing vociferously in favor of a political candidate we hope will oppose the slide into totalitarianism does little to relieve us of this complicity.  It's as though we are watching our own prisons being erected around us, yet we spend our days bickering about which foreman seems nicest.

    Here's something I like from John Pilger:

    Yes, a lot of good people mobilized to elect Obama, but what did they demand of him? Working to elect a Democratic Presidential candidate may seem like activism, but it is not. Activism doesn't give up. Activism doesn't fall silent. Activism doesn't rely on the opiate of hope. Woody Allen once said, "I felt a lot better when I gave up hope." Real activism has little time for identity politics, which, like exceptionalism, can be fake. These are distractions that confuse and sucker good people, and not only in the United States, I can assure you.

    Thanks for the diary.

    Intelligent manipulation of the masses is the invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country. - U.S. propagandist Edward Bernays

    by geomoo on Thu Apr 28, 2011 at 08:04:22 PM PDT

    •  I forget who said it.... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      geomoo, greeseyparrot

      but I read a few comments this week that made the point that the most meaningful progressive change comes from activism for a cause, not a political candidate.  A politician's candidacy for office is merely one instrument for affecting political change, but it's the issue's cause that's the most important goal.  I don't think the Civil Rights Movement would have been nearly as successful if its primary goal was the election of Lyndon Johnson or RFK Jr.

      I agree that issues like torture and human rights have not gotten as much attention as I would like here -- my guess is that a big part of that dynamic has to do with the fact that many Democratic activists are reluctant to criticize the President's performance on those issues.  But don't give up.  There are lots of us out there whose interests go far beyond electoral races.  Politicians come and go, but the cause remains the same.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site