Skip to main content

The beat goes on. Waukesha County continues counting votes from the April 5th Wisconsin Supreme Court election. The Government Accountability Board continues reviewing the numbers and adding them to their spreadsheet, now updated once daily. The numbers on the spreadsheet didn't change much between Friday and today. Waukesha counted on Saturday but the GAB took the weekend off, so the GAB is behind on its review of the recounted numbers. They should show a significant jump in the totals tomorrow.

For now, JoAnne Kloppenburg is holding a net gain of 319 votes.

She went into the recount behind by 7,316, so she needs a Waukesha County miracle to post a victory. Assuming she finishes behind David Prosser, she will have 5 business days after the GAB certifies the recount to challenge the results in court.  

I am not familiar with this blogger, but it sounds like the Kloppenburg campaign needs volunteer observers later this week, if anyone has some time to donate.

Unless something unusual happens, I will not continue posting a nightly diary on the recount, but I will post a final recount diary after all ballots have been counted in Waukesha County. I have a half-written diary on the Scott Walker administration's attack on credit unions I want to finish.

In case you missed my diary from yesterday, here is a repost of a portion of the official recount minutes from Marathon County. This was so odd, I just have to put it out there again...

Joyce Christian stated that during the April 5, 2011 election, a poll worker went into the Town of Maine townhall kitchen to retrieve more ballots to be used. On accident, the poll worker brought back ballots from the February 15. 2011 primary election.

Look behind the pickles, Joyce, and grab me a beer while you're in there.

Five ballots were given out. Three ballots were used, but before they were put into the M-100, the error was discovered and their ballots were remade. The February 2011 used primary ballots were then torn up and thrown away.

Betty Hoenisch offered to go to the Town of Maine townhall and try to see if the ballots were still in the recycling. The Democrats objected as to the chain of custody of the ballots at this point. The Canvass Board again agreed to let the M-100 results from today stand. Betty Hoenisch did return to the Town of Maine townhall to look for the torn up ballots, but called back at 4:30 p.m. to say that she did not find them.

Here are a couple new ones, from Buffalo County's minutes. First, from the notes on the Town of Canton recount:

Could not find absentee ballot certificate envelope. Called clerk and left message as she was not available. Organized canvass table and found absentee ballot certificate envelope. Called clerk back and left message with husband that we found what we needed.

Left message with the husband? Why do I have a feeling that somewhere in Buffalo County, the Canton town clerk is still looking for an envelope because she never got the message?

Next, from the Town of Lincoln:

There is a ballot with only one set of initials. The inspectors statement has a note on it that one of the poll workers remembers forgetting to initial the ballot before the voter cast his vote.

It guess it's better to remember forgetting than to forget remembering.

Originally posted to Giles Goat Boy on Mon May 16, 2011 at 08:19 PM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  What should we do while we wait? (9+ / 0-)

      Oh, I know...

      it is hereby DECLARED that 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 has not been published within the meaning of Wis. Stats. §§ 991.11, 35.095(1)(b) and 35.095(3)(b), and is therefore not in effect.

      by Giles Goat Boy on Mon May 16, 2011 at 08:59:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Tipped, recced and republished to (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      HudsonValleyMark

      Badger State Progressive.

      Welcome to the rockabilly-recount-teen-dance-party!

      Here's a slow one for Puddytat's knees.  She and I are old enough to remember when they played stuff like this on top 40 AM radio.

      If you can play the cowbell, thank a sheet metal worker.

      by ruleoflaw on Tue May 17, 2011 at 05:50:30 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  recent comments from Waukesha observer.. (0+ / 0-)

      ..who was interviewed for oped.com

      5/16/11

      My guest today is Brian Pruka. You're a Wisconsin resident currently observing the recount for the local Supreme Court race.  What got you interested in this process?

      Hi, Joan.  I am, as you said, a Wisconsin citizen, 47 years old. Right now I work a couple of part-time and temporary jobs to get by. I am an ecologist by training, and I work in the field of wildlife conservation during the summer. Since I'm not employed at a full-time job, I have some time to look into what is going on with the Waukesha County recount.

      I went to the Waukesha County Courthouse last Monday, May 9, to see for myself what is going on with the recount. I stayed 4.5 hours. I live in Madison, a 2.5 hour round trip and $16 in gas money, so the rest of the week I've just checked in to an Internet livestream video at
      < www.livestream.com/waukeshacounty >. Anyone can watch, although the way the camera is set up, you can't see most of what is going on. It is far, far from a complete video documentation.

      I first got interested in electoral issues during the 2000 presidential election. My preferred candidate then was Ralph Nader. The so-called "spoiler" issue bothered me tremendously--the fact that my vote for Nader meant one less vote for Al Gore, the candidate who was most likely to defeat George W. Bush, who I definitely did not want to be elected. I read an article somewhere about Instant Runoff Voting, which obviates the spoiler issue. That whetted my appetite for reading more about electoral systems used in other countries. We really don't have very good voting systems here in the USA. Our "winner-take-all" system leaves a lot of voters without representation. There are better systems and I like telling people about them because we deserve a better voting system than the one we've got. Other countries have a "Prius" for their voting system, and we are still driving a Model-T Ford.

      I got interested in the WI Supreme Court recount because I was appalled that the Waukesha County Clerk could fail to report an entire city's vote total -- over 14,000 votes!-- and just say oops and not have anyone look into it. Really, if you or I failed that colossally at our job, we would be fired.

      The fact that these "late-discovered" votes provided just barely enough of a winning margin to force the losing candidate to have to pay for a recount (rather than it be paid for by the state of Wisconsin) made things look that much more dubious. And then there were articles in the press noting how Waukesha County Clerk used to work for the candidate who had lost by a razor's edge--lost, that is, until Ms. Nickolas discovered her error of not reporting an entire city's votes.

      I want to know how it is possible that Waukesha County didn't have a system in place to double and triple check vote totals before reporting them. That seems real basic to me -- a fundamental failure.

      Our Government Accountability Board, which is charged with overseeing Wisconsin's elections to make sure they are fair and legitimate, would have let the whole thing pass without investigation, except that the initial-winner-two-days-later-loser candidate, Joanne Kloppenburg, decided to exercise her right to request a recount--a recount she has to pay for.

      If that is the kind of oversight the GAB provides of our voting system, then we citizens need to raise hell and look into this ourselves.

      I want to know what happened. People in Wisconsin are angry over this. We have a right to oversee the voting system and make sure that it is fair and functional.

      I can't disagree with anything that you've said so far, Brian. What can you tell us more specifically about what you've observed, either on the spot in Waukesha or remotely, about the recount effort?

      I've only been personally present at the Waukesha recount once. That was Monday, May 9th from 2:30pm until 7pm. I was motivated to make the 2.5 hour round-trip drive to Waukesha after I saw the May 5th photos on-line showing the open, unsecured ballot bags brought in to the recount that day.

      The recount is being held in the Waukesha County Courthouse cafeteria. When you first get there, it is hard to make sense of what is going on, as there are lots of people huddled around ten small tables, lots of talking and hubbub. It's a confusing jumble.

      Those of us present as citizen observers are required to sit in a gallery just outside the area with the many tables staffed by volunteer "tabulators." You are actually able to sit quite close, only six feet away from the closest tabulator tables. But it is far enough away that you can't read anything on either the poll books being reconciled or the ballots being examined for mis-marked ballots or write-ins.

      Also present are two Sequoia ballot scanners.

      One thing people should know is that about half of the ballots being recounted in Waukesha County are being recounted by feeding them through the Sequoia scanners. That's right, half the ballots are not being recounted by hand, they are just being fed through the machines. My understanding is that only 1/3 of the counties in Wisconsin were required to hand count their ballots.

      I think all the ballots should be recounted by hand. According to what I have read at the Citizens for Electoral Integrity Minnesota website (www.ceimn.org), recounts in Minnesota are entirely hand-counted.

      But our state's electoral oversight agency, the Government Accountability Board (GAB), set up the guidelines for the recount and they decided that only some of the ballots required hand recounting. My understanding is the GAB decided that ballots originally tallied by the newer version of the Sequoia scanning equipment didn't need hand counting because these machines have two memory cards, and since one of the memory cards is apparently kept and sealed with the ballots after the polls closed, the GAB felt this was good enough proof of what the vote totals were and so a machine recount was adequate.

      So it sounds to me like the GAB has presumed that the scanner machines are flawless and that there is no manipulation of the vote-tallying software in these machines.

      We don't have immediate post-election hand-counted audits of random precincts like they do in Minnesota, nor do we have a system of exit-polling in place as a way to safeguard against computer vote manipulation, so I don't see how we can have any assurance at all here in Wisconsin that computers have counted the vote without fraud or error.

      It seems like a hand recount is essential. But our GAB has decided to trust computers.

      So guess where the computers used for the Waukesha recount are stored each night? In the office of the County Clerk, the office of the person who "forgot to push the save button" in her Microsoft Access file of vote totals and thereby forgot to include over 14,000 votes in the election results she published for Waukesha County the night of the election.

      Now the Waukesha County Clerk, Kathy Nickolaus, has recused herself from participating in the recount. But according to people who have been attending the recount fairly often over the past three weeks, Ms. Nickolaus is sitting up in her office at the Courthouse during the day while the recount is going on in the Courthouse's basement cafeteria. Seems to me that she should not be in the courthouse at all during the recount, let alone sitting in the office where the recount computers are stored every night!

      We are supposed to trust all of this.

      I absolutely cannot trust the recount unless it is all by hand.

      And even then, those ballots were sitting in Ms. Nickolaus' custody for three weeks after the election. As many of your readers have probably heard, several of the sealed bags holding the ballots have arrived at the recount with gaping holes in the bags.

      Personally, I kind of doubt that Ms. Nickolaus has been physically altering thousands of ballots. But I think if we are going to bother with a recount at all, we should be hand counting all of the ballots, examining them closely to make sure they have not been altered.

      If Nickolaus is part of vote fraud, it is much more likely that she/they did it through manipulation of the computer software that counts the votes. And we don't have any kind of system set up here in Wisconsin to protect against that.

      My hope is that we here in Wisconsin will form a citizens group like the CEIMN group they have in Minnesota that will force Wisconsin to adopt a by hand recount procedure and to adopt a system of post-election auditing of random precincts to insure against computer manipulation of vote-tallying.

      Perhaps we need an exit-poll system as a second back up against computer manipulation. I think that combination would be enough to insure that all the votes are indeed counted and counted correctly, although some people that hand counting all ballots the night of the election is the only way to prevent computer-based voting fraud. From what I hear, they hand count all the ballots on election night in New Hampshire.

      One thing is for sure. We Wisconsin citizens need to organize to oversee our voting system. Our Government Accountability Board is not doing the job that needs to be done.

      It's quite disturbing to think that Ms. Nickolaus and those ballots have been sharing office space. But don't be in such a hurry to emulate New Hampshire. According to Nancy Tobi, New Hampshire resident and long-time democracy warrior, "Almost 90% if not more of NH ballots are run through optical scanners on election night and not hand counted at all." All of us are in a pickle with votes we can't see or count and chains of custody that can be and are easily breeched.  

      There's a lot of work to be done and shining some light on what's actually going on and how our elections work, or don't, is an important first step. Thanks so much for talking with me, Brian. And good luck in Wisconsin. There's a lot riding on this race.

      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty" Thomas Jefferson

      by hodag on Wed May 18, 2011 at 03:29:43 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I really want to read that diary (5+ / 0-)

    on Walker and credit unions.  Or do I?

  •  Thanks for the update (4+ / 0-)

    "Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing." - Thomas Paine

    by blueoregon on Mon May 16, 2011 at 09:45:06 PM PDT

  •  The 2nd word of 'credit union' is very suspect n/t (4+ / 0-)

    Dream, that's the thing to do (Johnny Mercer)

    by plankbob on Tue May 17, 2011 at 03:03:26 AM PDT

  •  1-5 ballot screw ups (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Giles Goat Boy

    Are probably normal.  It's 14,000 appearing two days later that we need to worry about.

    http://www.aeinstein.org/organizations/org/FDTD.pdf From Dictatorship to Democracy, Guide to Non Violent Protests.

    by sdelear on Tue May 17, 2011 at 05:51:00 AM PDT

  •  Is there anything to this report with Kloppenburg (0+ / 0-)

    Slow thinkers - keep right

    by Dave the Wave on Tue May 17, 2011 at 12:55:41 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site