Skip to main content

I do not find funny Pete Sessions' latest claim to be a guardian of senior citizens' interest.
The same Pete Sessions who seemingly couldn't say enough good things about the financially and morally irresponsible Ryan bill he so enthusiastically supports, now wants folks to think he is something he has shown clearly that he isn't.
The same Pete Sessions who voted to gut Medicare in favor of a voucher system that will cost seniors well more than twice what they currently pay for traditional Medicare, is now showing a picture on his taxpayer-supported web site claiming to be a "guardian of seniors' rights." If he is a guardian of seniors' rights, Al Capone was the greatest champion of law and order of all time.
Does he really think seniors (or seniors-to-be like me) think we're going to fall for his con and then claim that the shady "60-plus association" represents seniors? If he really thinks so, he really must think we're dumber than first graders.
More below.

If anyone still doesn't know about the 60-Plus Associationand its work against average folks like me, here's part of what Source Watch reports about this organization:

The 60 Plus Association is described in an article posted November 1, 2009 on as a Big Pharma front group. FireDogLake reported that the group has "ties to the national GOP" and is "almost fully funded by the pharmaceutical industry." The 60 Plus Association is reported to have been a front for Big Pharma since it's inception.

And if that wasn't enough, here is part of what Rachel Maddowreported about the "60-Plus Association in 2009:
A look at the group‘s leadership seems to suggest at least a slightly partisan tilt.  The president of 60 Plus is a gentleman named Jim Martin.  You may remember him from some of his previous and recent advocacy work, such as the Public Service Research Council otherwise known as Americans Against Union Control of Government.  He was also involved with the National Conservative Political Action Committee.  Hmm, non-partisan.
Alongside Mr. Martin is the group‘s honorary chairman, Roger Zion, who the Web site itself promotes as, quote, “one of Washington‘s leading spokesman for the conservative cause.”  Indeed, Roger Zion is a former Republican congressman from Indiana who authored new book called, “The Republican Challenge.”
That‘s who‘s running this non-partisan group that‘s currently running ads scaring old people about President Obama‘s health care reform plans.

And now Pete Sessions wants folks in his district to believe that he is a "guardian of seniors rights" because a certain organization that claims to fights for seniors but has a history of fighting against seniors'  interests calls him a "friend of seniors."
Oh really? Does supporting legislation that could force seniors in our state to pay more than double for their health care make one a "guardian of seniors"? Pete Sessions and his 60-Plus Association friends must think we're stupid enough to believe that.
I'm fed up with how Republicans like Sessions have conned seniors through the years into thinking that they really care about seniors. I hope and pray that Sessions and their allies are thrown out of office in November.
And I pray further that our party will find a candidate who can raise the sort of money and garner the support that will be needed to force Sessions and others like him out of office.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CoolOnion, skillet, thomask, Pinto Pony

    "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Mohandas K. Gandhi

    by alaprst on Mon May 23, 2011 at 07:07:02 AM PDT

  •  Interesting question for Pedro...'Who do you hate (0+ / 0-)

    most?....Obama?....Duh Democrat Partee?....or your constituents?'

  •  Non-partisan simply means (0+ / 0-)

    "not officially connected to any organized political party."  It's a position that responds, rightly, to the realization that political parties are increasingly irrelevant. Politicians looking to acquire power are disenchanted with parties which can't guarantee their election.  It used to be that the Republican party could offer such a guarantee in some parts of the country. The Tea Party people have written finis to that.  So, potential petty potentates have to look to other strategies. Taking the intent for the act worked for Bush.  No reason other Texans can't try it.
    Ineffectual people do have an advantage in that nobody expects them to actually accomplish what they propose. It's one thing for someone with lousy aim to point a pistol; it's another for a good shot.

    by hannah on Mon May 23, 2011 at 09:44:44 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site