Skip to main content

So we already had a great diary on the GOP's insistence that disaster relief aid for Joplin could not be given unless budget cuts were made elsewhere.  Well, it seems the Republicans found their target: A loan program that supports the production of fuel efficient vehicles:

"If there is support for a supplemental spending measure, it would be accompanied by support for having pay-fors to that supplemental," Cantor said.

The House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday began the process of making that happen by approving a disaster aid package for fiscal year 2012 that would be financed by a $1.5 billion cut from a loan program to encourage the production of fuel-efficient vehicles.

So, not only is disaster relief conditioned on spending cuts.  It's conditioned on a spending cut aimed at the type of sensible environmental program that Republicans can't stand.

I mean, that's gotta be the ONLY way to pay for these cuts, right?  Raise taxes on the rich?  Pffft.  Cut our overbloated defense budget in ways that even the Republican Secretary of Defense says is workable?  Forget about it.  Cut funding for faith-based initiatives?  No way.  The only way to make this work is by making cuts to programs that progressives support.

Targeting a fuel efficient vehicle program holds a particular irony, since rising global temperatures due to vehicle-based carbon emissions will make deadly tornadoes like the one to hit Joplin even more likely to happen in the future.  But that's a story for another day.

And of course, now that they've put together this "aid package," they will say that the Democrats who dare to oppose it are the ones obstructing federal aid for tornado victims.

Senator Claire McCaskell had the perfect response to the House GOP's efforts to hold disaster funding for her constituents hostage:

"There is no question we have to be careful about the way we spend federal money, but with all due respect to Congressman Cantor, I have a hard time believing that if this were in his congressional district he would be talking about how additional disaster relief would not be available unless we found some other program to take it from," McCaskill said.

"It must be available," insisted McCaskill from the floor. "This cannot be a political football. We must provide the assistance. [W]hat federal tax dollars are for is to provide assistance when there is no assistance available for communities because of the wrath of mother nature.”

This is the GOP's strategy now.  They view everything from tornadoes to the prospect of defaulting on government bonds as an opportunity to cut the parts of the government they don't like.  Want a budget for the rest of the fiscal year?  Cut funding for Planned Parenthood.  Want to raise the debt ceiling?  Slash everything from food stamps to Medicare to college financial aid.

But this takes the cake.  Want us to provide aid for the victims of an EF5 tornado?  Cut funding for fuel efficient vehicles.  That's all they cared about when they heard about this:

That's the far right for you.  All they see in the deadliest American tornado in 60 years is a political opportunity.

I'd write a longer diary on this, but really what's the point?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (12+ / 0-)

    Preaching to the choir and then shooting them when they don't sing loud enough isn't a good strategy for increasing the size of the congregation.

    by Matisyahu on Wed May 25, 2011 at 11:06:13 AM PDT

  •  Cut Congressional pay, first. n/t (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bythesea, J V Calin, dougymi, Sue B

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Wed May 25, 2011 at 11:28:20 AM PDT

  •  Repeal tax subsidies for Big Oil. There! Done! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Russgirl, Sue B
  •  Cancel congressional pensions (0+ / 0-)

    That is a real spending cut, they don't need it anyway, and if really suggested, you could get a huge majority to agree and perhaps demand it.

    •  [We] can't simply "cancel" congressional pensions. (0+ / 0-)

      Members of congress, now retired and also current, pay (and have paid) into their pensions...which really aren't all that remarkable...very nice, to be sure, but not huge.

      By my reading and math of some old numbers, the current payout of congressional pensions amounts to around a total of (probably) $23m to $25m.  Peanuts, in terms of the budget...and probably not enough to cover much in the way of Federal emergency response(s).

      Eliminating taxpayers subsidies to Big Oil companies, which are booking never-before-realized profits is, in my opinion, not a "tax hike."  The breaks they get amount to about $4billion, annually.  If one presumes the fungibility of money, the American taxpayers (some of them living in Joplin, MO. ;) )  have been subsidizing Big Oil's liberal indugence in lobbyists and lobbying...which, of course goes a long way toward ensuring Big Oil's continued subsidies.

      I tell ya what, let's negotiate...

      I say, let's cut all Big Oil subsidies...

      You can say, no let's not cut any...

      I'll say, okay...let's meet in the middle...let's just cut 1/2 of the Big Oil subsidies...  

      ...$2billion a year to the public coffers; one half of one percent of current Big Oil profits.  That should cover some needs... around half of the entire annual FEMA budget. ;)  

      •  My bad... (0+ / 0-)

        I just looked it up:  $2billion would cover 100% of the requested FY11 budget for Federal Disaster Relief Fund.

      •  Don't get me wrong (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        IMHO cutting the big oil subsidies is definitely something we should do.  And yes, the pensions would have to be phased out. Either is a start.  But I don't see any action being taken on those. (either).  

        •  My take... (0+ / 0-)

          ...I want to be able to use the perks provided by working as congresspersons (and public sector union members) to argue for why the average American worker should also enjoy those perks. ;)

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site