Everything here is in my friend's words. This is the gist of what was said before they became catatonic:
That's it. I'm done. A line has been crossed.
I was fine when the Republicans took Thomas Paine. I accepted it, even though I said quietly to my closest friends "You know Thomas Paine proposed early versions of what would today be called socialism." He was so socialist he suggested an early version of Social Security. I put up with it when Glenn Beck titled his book "Common Sense" without reading the fucking pamphlet "Common Sense." Not a book, even! It's just a fucking pamphlet!
I put up with it while they started dressing up like and invoking the names of the founding fathers, even though George Washington was a member of the Landed Gentry, Liberal Elite, who said "You know, Tom, there might be something to this Deism thing." He was not some backwoods man of the people with a musket.
I understand that this is difficult. It's difficult!
It's difficult understanding that Thomas Jefferson was a Deist who rewrote the bible to exclude all references to divinity, and slept with his wife's half-sister because he had a bad case of jungle fever and was kind of an asshole.
It's difficult understanding that Benny Franklin was in love with France, including French Wine, French Philosophers, and French Prostitutes. He was an alcoholic sex addict who fucking loved France, and liked to walk around naked and take "Air Baths." So he was a nudist, alcoholic, sex addict francophile, with connections to all sorts of bizarre secret societies and occultists (It's hard to get into this history, unfortunately, without running into illuminati new world order conspiracy theory bullshit which conservatives love). Benjamin Franklin is kind of a hero of mine, crazy brilliant lewd old man, who thought that people should fart proudly.
These were all men who were fond of Muslims.
My point is, these were VERY complicated men. They were very difficult to take as a whole. They had complex ideas and complex life stories. Their writings are archaic and difficult to understand. In High School History, it's not standard to discuss the more controversial beliefs of the founding fathers. It's traditional and common to discuss FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM! AMURICA! LIBERTY! DOWN WITH TYRANNY! and all the other Tea Party Talking Points.
I understand that you have to be a history fan to understand these things so I can deal with them taking the beliefs of these men out of context, and simplifying and deifying these men.
But what is not complex is Paul Revere. You can't look at his myriad writings and letters and say "Oh no! Paul Revere didn't actually believe this. He's different from how the stories cast him." His story is so simple there are fucking first reader versions! The Story of Paul Revere is pure propaganda. (Which Palin should Love.) Paul Revere is one of dozens of men and at least one girl, who went on rides to warn the minute men to assemble.
They didn't warn the British. They didn't tell people to hide the guns. They told people to get their guns. They said "HEY GUYS! GET YO SHIT! THE MUTHAFUCKIN BRITISH!!"
Paul Revere didn't even complete his ride. He was captured before he could do it. The only reason he's remembered is because his name was easiest to rhyme, and he had the virtue of not being a 16 year old girl. But none of that's important. Because it's history. I'm not talking about History. I'm talking about the story that every schoolchild knows. I'm talking about "Listen my children and you will hear." I'm talking about "One if by land, Two if by sea." I'm talking about asking a school child "What did Paul Revere say" and getting the response "The British are Coming! The British are Coming!"
Why would Paul Revere say "HEY YOU GUYS ARE COMING!" to the British unless he was having sex with them?!
At this point, my friend collapsed in a ball on the floor and started sobbing while hugging these books tightly:
I cannot speak to why Damer's
Attacking Faulty Reasoning, a High School American History book, and John Stewart's
America the Book comfort my friend, but they seem to be the only thing staving off a decline into complete despair.
The Midnight Ride of William Dawes
By Helen F. Moore
I am a wandering, bitter shade,
Never of me was a hero made;
Poets have never sung my praise,
Nobody crowned my brow with bays;
And if you ask me the fatal cause,
I answer only, "My name was Dawes"
'Tis all very well for the children to hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere;
But why should my name be quite forgot,
Who rode as boldly and well, God wot?
Why should I ask? The reason is clear --
My name was Dawes and his Revere.
When the lights from the old North Church flashed out,
Paul Revere was waiting about,
But I was already on my way.
The shadows of night fell cold and gray
As I rode, with never a break or a pause;
But what was the use, when my name was Dawes!
History rings with his silvery name;
Closed to me are the portals of fame.
Had he been Dawes and I Revere,
No one had heard of him, I fear.
No one has heard of me because
He was Revere and I was Dawes.
Longfellow was a shit poet who couldn't bothered to add the names Prescott and Dawes into his stupid poem. Presumuably because Prescott rhymes only with Ascot. There's a good poem about him too. [Note that it never once rhymes Prescott.]
I think it's tragic that we only picked one rider to revere. I asked my friend's opinion about that statement, and the only response was more sobbing a mumbled recitation of Longfellow's poem.
Some are asking why we didn't learn this stuff in school. As grannyhelen posts:
Why? Why?!
Because our country goes into a f*cking meltdown because a 45 year old congressman tweets his nekkid manboobs to consenting anonymous women on the internet...
THAT'S WHY.
You think we can handle Benjamin Franklin? My god, can you imagine Franklin's f*cking twitter account if they had one back in the day? It would make Weiner look like a f*cking puritan schoolgirl.
...okay, rant off.
I feel better - thanks.