Skip to main content

They didn't debate. Nobody won. Journalism  lost--big time. It's so disheartening and infuriating to witness the media aftermath of the nationally broadcast Republican infomercial that disgraced the airwaves on Monday night [June 13]. Promoting it in advance as  a "debate"  was a deliberate mis-labeling that any self-respecting news network [CNN] should be ashamed of.

What CNN did was to trot out a line-up of GOP right-wingers to give them a platform from which to spew--unchallenged--their hatred all things Obama, their disregard for the needs of middle-class Americans, a large serving of xenophobia, and their disdain for any policy that might contribute to the common good of this country. This is what passes for "debate" in contemporary American politics, I suppose, but I don't have to like it, do I?

Calling it a "debate" was an obvious marketing strategy--one desigend to lend gravitas to an event, so that viewers can congratulate themselves for watching it and being engaged citizens [and so that CNN could congratulate itself on airing it]. But what actually took place was not only not a debate, it was not a serious event. And host John King gets most of the blame for that: Rather than doing his job as a purported journalist, which could have included an attempt to challenge factual mis-statements by the candidates, King cheapened the entire event with a series of silly questions designed, he said, to help us "get to know the candidates personally." On his list were: "Which do you prefer--Leno or Conan?" "American Idol or Dancing with the Stars?" "Coke or Pepsi?" "iPod or Blackberry?" "Deep dish or thin crust?"  And my personal favorite: "Elvis Presley or Johnny Cash?"  After the first in that series, I doubted that I had heard him correctly. But when he persisited with this line of product- and celebrity-based inquiries, I red-lined on the revulsion meter and couldn't restrain myself from yelling at the tv.

After that performance as the host of the "debate," King should turn in his press credentials and slink off into a  special  circle of Hell designated for journalists who have abandoned their self-respect, integrity and ethics.

The candidates themselves could have saved King, if they had wanted to. If just one had responded to King's stupid question du jour by saying, "That's a silly question, John. Let's talk about jobs," that would have been the end of it. But, of course, they all played along, our political "discourse" sank to a new low, and promises to stay there, now that these kinds of inane questions have been legitimized by CNN, which touts itself as having the best political coverage in America.

So, though I switched off the tv feeling soiled by the CNN Republican comedy show/infomercial, I had hopes that Day After reportage would reflect a modicum of exasperation with King's questions and the absence of challenges to some of the statements made by the candidates. That was not to be. One after another, morning-after pundits commented on the CNN show by repeatedly calling it a "debate," and by quoting the participants' statements as if they had been delivered during an event of significance. Maybe I missed something, or maybe I haven't dug deeply enough, but I didn't see any references, in the mainstream media, to the idiotic questions asked by John King. [Jon Stewart's Daily Show, however, did an excellent job of skewering the "debate," calling it a game show.] And, of course, CNN didn't mention them, either--no surprise.

As the first in what promises to be a long series of similar political info-tainment shows, I'm afraid that this one may have set a particularly bad precedent that is not being acknowledged and will continue to cheapen our already deeply-discounted political discourse.

[Crossposted from Forward STL]

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site