Skip to main content

Crossposted on 43rd State Blues

The Guantanamo Bay detention camp is a detainment facility of the United States located within the United States' Guantanamo Bay Naval Base on the island of Cuba. The facility was established in 2002 by the Bush Administration to hold detainees from the war in Afghanistan and later Iraq. It is operated by the Joint Task Force Guantanamo of the United States government in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which is on the shore of Guantánamo Bay. The detainment areas consist of three camps: Camp Delta (which includes Camp Echo), Camp Iguana, and Camp X-Ray, the last of which has been closed. The facility is often referred to as Guantánamo, G-Bay or Gitmo, and has the military abbreviation GTMO.

U.S. Senator Jim Risch returned from touring Guantanamo Bay Monday evening, capping a full day of meetings and tours of the detention facilities located at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base on the island of Cuba.

According to Risch:

Since 2002, Guantanamo has held some of the most dangerous terrorists and combatants, and President Bush sought to try detainees through military tribunals.

As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court case, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Congress drafted the Military Commissions Act, which was signed into law in October 2006 and provided the legal authority for the United States to try detainees.


Further history:

After the Justice Department advised that the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp could be considered outside U.S. legal jurisdiction, the first twenty captives arrived at Guantanamo on January 11, 2002. After the Bush administration asserted that detainees were not entitled to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld on June 29, 2006, that they were entitled to the minimal protections listed under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. Following this, on July 7, 2006, the Department of Defense issued an internal memo stating that prisoners would in the future be entitled to protection under Common Article 3. The detainees held as of June 2008 have been classified by the United States as "enemy combatants."

On January 22, 2009, the White House announced that President Barack Obama had signed an order to suspend the proceedings of the Guantanamo military commission for 120 days and that the detention facility would be shut down within the year. On January 29, 2009, a military judge at Guantanamo rejected the White House request in the case of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, creating an unexpected challenge for the administration as it reviews how America puts Guantanamo detainees on trial.

On Jan 7, 2011, President Obama signed the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill which contains provisions preventing the transfer of Guantanamo prisoners to the mainland or to other foreign countries, and thus effectively stops the closure of the detention facility. However he strongly objected to the clauses and stated that he would work with Congress to oppose the measures. U.S. Secretary of Defense Gates said during a testimony before the US Senate Armed Services Committee on February 17, 2011: “The prospects for closing Guantanamo as best I can tell are very, very low given very broad opposition to doing that here in the Congress.”

A Guardian UK article called  Judge's anger at US torture talks about how after the United Nations called unsuccessfully for the Guantanamo Bay detention camp to be closed, one judge observed "America's idea of what is torture ... does not appear to coincide with that of most civilised nations."

In April 2011, Wikileaks began publishing 779 secret files relating to prisoners in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

But Risch sees things differently:

"This tour was an opportunity to understand first-hand the enormous challenge facing military pesonnel and lawyers that work to keep America safe.  I was able to tour the legal and detention facilities, as well as talk with a number of military personnel and lawyers about how the United States treats and handles detainees from the global war on terror," said Risch.  "I can say without a doubt that a lot of what is said in the press about Guantanamo is inaccurate and overblown."

Risch continues:

Unfortunately, in January 2009 President Obama issued an executive order to close the detention center and transfer the detainees.  In January, Congress prohibited the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo Bay to the United States, and six months ago, President Obama reversed his position, issuing a new executive order to try detainees using the military commissions authorized by Congress.

"While some detainees were able to be released or transferred to other countries for
detention, there remains a clear case for maintaining the detention facilities at
Guantanamo Bay," concluded Risch.

Traveling with Senator Risch on the military tour were Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS),
Senator John Hoeven (R-ND), and Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO).

There is broad opposition from representatives in Congress. So is the role of the press in Guantanamo a flawed endeavor?

How so?

Related Reading:
Inside Gitmo: The True Story Behind the Myths of Guantanamo Bay by Gordon Cucullu

Poll

A lot of what is said in the press about Guantanamo is

41%5 votes
33%4 votes
25%3 votes

| 12 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Obama and Risch are on the same page? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FiredUpInCA

    I find this a bit of a stretch. While I agree Obama reversed himself on trying detainees, given no other choice by Congress. He has not reversed himself on wanting to close it.

    In the choice between changing ones mind and proving there's no need to do so, most people get busy on the proof.

    by jsfox on Fri Jun 17, 2011 at 03:01:28 PM PDT

    •  The "no choice" canard again. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ColoTim, Johnny Q
      While I agree Obama reversed himself on trying detainees, given no other choice by Congress.

      Obama never had any real intention of closing Gitmo - merely moving it to Illinois.  That's why he chose to sign the bill blocking the transfer of prisoners to the mainland rather than veto it.

      But even if Obama can't bring them here, he could always send an Article III judge over there to president over a regular civilian trial.  He's chosen not to.

      But it is interesting to see people still float the "no choice" excuse even as Obama flaunts the separation of powers and the WPA by starting a war in Libya.  When Obama really wants something, he'll just up and do it, Congress be damned.  Like appointing a deficit panel after Congress voted down the idea.  Like having the DOJ unilaterally revise Miranda guidelines, again after Congress voted down the idea.

      When will people give up excusing Obama's bad actions "because his hands are tied".  They aren't.  Obama is doing exactly what he wants to do.

      Ask not what Obama can do for you, but what you can do for Obama!

      by Uberbah on Fri Jun 17, 2011 at 03:26:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  main difference between those things (0+ / 0-)

        you cite and Guantanamo - money. No money, no illinois prison. No money, no money to close down gitmo. Congress says spend money on gitmo or whatever? President must spend the money there. See earmarks.

        The things you cite were all administrative actions. Totally different kettle of fish.

  •  Notice who he talked to. (0+ / 0-)

    Think he had any conversations with our torture victims?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site