Skip to main content

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser is facing allegations that he put both hands around the neck of fellow Justice Ann Walsh Bradley following a confrontation in Walsh Bradleys chambers. After asking the piece of shit Prosser to leave her chambers, he allegedly became enraged and grabbed Walsh Bradley by the neck with both hands in front of several witnesses. Both parties involved, as well as the witnesses have declined to comment. Capitol Police Chief Charles Tubbs has spoken with the entire Supreme Court, but has declined to comment as well. The matter was exposed by Wisconsin Public Radio and the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism.

The Wisconsin Judicial Commission could not confirm or deny any investigations, which seems odd. Another oddity, and probably smoking gun, is the fact that Prosser has not denied any of this. Of course, nobody should be surprised. Prosser has a history of intimidating women. It was he who called another female Justice, Shirley Abrahmson, a "total bitch". He also threatened to destroy her and her career. Prosser even went so far as to blame these women, claiming they have a reputation for bringing out the worst in people and doing their best to provoke others into these kinds of situations. It is clear this man has a deep seated hatred for women. Who knows, perhaps his mommy didnt tell him she loved him enough. Regardless, I have to scratch my head at Wisconsin and our voters. The people "elected" Prosser this past spring, despite the prior verbal assault on Abrahmson, and despite being the mentor to dictator Walker. Perhaps now the message is loud and clear: THIS MAN IS TRASH AND HE NEEDS TO BE PUT IN A BIN AND SET OUT ON THE CURB TO BE TAKEN TO THE DUMP. There are several options for removing Prosser once an investigation is finished, and it is proven he has assaulted this woman. As ThinkProgress reports, the people may remove him by recall, however, since the elections were just held, Prosser would still have about a year to wreak more havoc. He may also be impeached, or be romoved by a "removal of address". Prosser may also resign, but cmon, does anybody think this guy has the scrupules? No, didnt think so. Either way, now is the time to make your voice heard. THIS WILL NOT STAND! Tell Scott Walker, his cronies, and Justice Prosser that you are tired of the legislative assault on women, and now you are tired of the physical and verbal assault on women by this man!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  asdf (0+ / 0-)

    Just a passing question:

    Why did not Judge Bradley file a formal complaint and begin the process of having him both arrested AND removed from the bench?

    After all, he could not use the usual threats against her if she turned him in - she being a judge herself and cognizant of the rules and of the punishments for assault.

    That question needs to be answered - of course, after Prosser is both removed from the bench and prosecuted for assault.

    The Democratic Party. Never has so much been squandered so quickly for so little.

    by GayIthacan on Sat Jun 25, 2011 at 03:32:34 PM PDT

    •  a (0+ / 0-)

      Yeah there are definitely a few questions remaining. hopefully a thorough investigation ensues and justice is served quickly! As much as I hate Prosser, it would be a relief to find out this was a hoax. Sadly, I doubt it is, since this man has a history of these kinds of actions.

      •  It's not a hoax.... (0+ / 0-)

        He hasn't denied it -- just refused to comment. Something happened or there would have been an emphatic denial.

        it tastes like burning...

        by eastvan on Sat Jun 25, 2011 at 04:05:02 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  why should the burden be on him... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          RockyMtnLib, ericbau114

          you may not like him but that does not make him a bad person. If he had attacked or threatened a fellow justice, and there are witnesses then why is she not pressing charges?

          You don't have to prove that you are not guilty, the aggrieved party has to prove that you are guilty, that is how it works.

          •  i agree (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            Thats the only part of this story that confuses me. Since this happened at the Capitol, does anybody know if this is solely under the jurisdiction of the Capitol Police, or does Madison and/or Dane County have jurisdiction? Because from what I understand, Capitol Police Chief Charles Tubbs is aware of the situation, and has addressed it with the WI Supreme court. So perhaps there is an investigation in progress, and statements or evidence is being gathered to bring charges? Not sure. Doesnt it seem kind of like the situation with Anthony Weiner though? You know, where everyone questioned why he hadnt contacted the FBI or anybody about being hacked... We will have to see how this plays out I guess. Oh, to add one thing, the fact that he has a history of misogyny DOES make him a bad person in my opinion. Of course, that doesnt mean he is guilty of these specific allegations, but it would indeed be in character.

          •  Good judges have internal rules about trying to (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            protect the institution when one of their number acts out abominably.

            Whether or not Prosser will be protected by the Fitzswalkerstanis, something he may be assuming since he is one of their boys, and the money for the election came in to make sure their boy had the possibility of absolute control of that Bench, he may be protected at least for awhile by the arcane customs of lawyers who handle their internal profesional brawls, not usually the literal kind, through legal disciplinary processes, which are almost never public. He may have thought that the recent election protected him from the consequences of his actions, to a degree that he could bully the women of the court enough to make himself the effective chief justice.

            If you read Bar journals and the like, you wouldn't know something was happening from the date a complaint is filed until the date it is over and the decision is issued, no matter how hot the proceeding is, unless some one of the parties refuses to have it handled professionally.  That may be the decision here, or they may be looking at the degree to which this event could if made public damage the entire institution. Which judges care a lot more about than the conduct of any one of their number.  All those 'no comment' bits suggest a proceeding is in the works, and they know from the number of inquiries that this one is not going away.

          •  Because like domestic abuse cases in the (0+ / 0-)

            'finer communities', often not much comes out.

             At first.

             It's because she was a fellow jurist. May not be proper, but it is a different playing field. She will speak at the appropriate time. In fact, the silence on the issue speaks volumes in and of itself.

            it tastes like burning...

            by eastvan on Sat Jun 25, 2011 at 06:47:55 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

          •  asdf (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            1. He has done it before.


            The latest alleged incident involving Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser can't be viewed in isolation. Last year, Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson in a closed door meeting, calling her a "bitch" and threatening to "destroy" her.

            That incident came to light during Prosser's re-election campaign earlier this year. Prosser admitted to using the word "bitch," but said it was justified. "I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted," he said in March.

            Why did Prosser think it was warranted? "They (Abrahamson and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley) are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements. This is bullying and abuse of very, very long standing," Prosser claimed.

            That's the same Ann Walsh Bradley with whom Prosser allegedly got in a new argument last week, in her chambers, where his hands ended up around her neck, in the presence of other justices, in the midst of their deliberations over the legality of Gov. Scott Walker's union-busting bill. Presumably because she was bullying and abusing him again.

            2. NO ONE issued an immediate denial about the event -as any innocent person would have.

            I have no doubt whatsoever that he did it.

            What I want to know is why the victim has taken no action as of yet.

            The Democratic Party. Never has so much been squandered so quickly for so little.

            by GayIthacan on Sat Jun 25, 2011 at 11:34:20 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  she did (0+ / 0-)

              Justice Walsh Bradley released a statement late Saturday night confirming the allegations against Prosser. An investigation is in process i believe. Honestly, though, expect a shroud of silence until the matter is fully investigated. This wont be as poorly executed as the scandal with Weiner and Breitbart.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site