Skip to main content

On Sunday, the New York Times published a story questioning natural gas industry claims about the nature and viability of shale gas formations across the country. That afternoon, Chesapeake Energy CEO Aubrey McClendon, who heads up one of the nation's largest shale gas drilling companies, blasted the NYT story, calling it misleading and all but accusing anyone who questions the value of shale gas deposits of sedition.

But publicly available documents published by the federal Energy Information Administration clearly show that the NYT was right, in devastating detail.

On Sunday, the New York Times published a well-researched story, supported by a trove of documents such as emails between natural gas industry executives, market analyst reports and internal agency documents, questioning the claims made by natural gas industry executives about the productivity of their hydraulic fracturing wells and the size of the reserves locked away in the shale formations across the United States.

The story prompted an immediate response from Chesapeake Energy CEO Aubrey McClendon, who questioned the reporter’s motivation for writing the piece and castigated the story as the work of a handful of anti-American environmental activists hell-bent on derailing our nation’s energy future.

The fact is, though, that other, more objective observers have also questioned the claims made by the natural gas industry — including the federal Energy Information Administration.

From the EIA Annual Energy Outlook for 2011:

Estimates of technically recoverable shale gas are certain to change over time as new information is gained through drilling and production, and through development of shale gas recovery technology. Over the past decade, as more shale formations have been explored and used for commercial production, estimates of technically and economically recoverable shale gas resources have skyrocketed. However, the estimates embody many assumptions that might prove to be untrue in the long term.

Read more here.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Chesapeake is #1 at getting sued (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bcre8ve, JeffW, Gemina13

    A very quick search finds them weaseling out of paying for leases in Michigan, spilling frac fluid in Pennsylvania & cheating on royalties in Virginia. Chesapeake is providing good jobs at good pay for more lawyers than just about any company not in receivership.

    Which, given the generally awful economics of producing gas these days  ($7/kcf cost ,$4/kcf price), is kind of remarkable.

    •  OT, trivial, sorry (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Gemina13, Downpuppy

      Just to avoid any confusion for your readers,
      industry usage:

      "mcf" for thousand cubic feet
      "mmcf" for million cubic feet (thousand thousands)
      "bcf" for billion cubic feet
      "tcf" for trillion cubic feet

      depending on who's doing the conversion, 5.6-6.0 bcf/mmboe
      (million barrels of oil equivalent).

      but, yeah, it's not clear that much of the shale gas is economic at current N.Am. prices. OTOH at $10/mcf there's plenty.

      Supermajors Exxon, Shell, Total apparently think some of this stuff is going to work. Chevron and Conoco seem to be focusing on non-US shale gas.

      Success will depend on drilling efficiency, completion technology, and methodology for sweet spot identification.

  •  Overstating your case (0+ / 0-)

    I think the EIA documents, at least what I see quoted, don't really support the NYT story that strongly.

    The EIA mostly says there is uncertainty in the estimates, not that they are vastly exaggerated.

    Personally, I think the NYT story is likely to be correct, but I don't think we've got a good 2nd source in the EIA yet.

  •  Fracking didn't work... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gemina13

    ...when the government tried it using a tactical nuclear device under Project Plowshares. It still doesn't work.

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Mon Jun 27, 2011 at 01:33:46 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site