Skip to main content

gay marriage

The Federal Government is a sprawling thing. How else could it be? After all it is governing 305 million people and that can’t be done out of a small office behind the Kwiki Mart. Still there are times when the left hand knows what the right hand is doing that they work together instead of at cross purposes.

I am happy to point out one of these times today. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency has decided that it will suspend the deportation proceedings for a Mr. Henry Velandia. What is the reason that Mr. Velandia is getting a reprieve from being deported? It is because he is married to Josh Vandiver.

That’s right, because these two men were married in Connecticut; ICE is closing the deportation case against Mr. Velandia. You see this comes out of the Obama Administration’s decision not to contest the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

When Attorney General Holder and President Obama decided that DOMA was unconstitutional it did not mean just that they would stop fighting the cases against it in court. It became the position of the Executive Branch that the actions of the government should reflect this new position.

This means, for now, that gay couples where one partner is an informal immigrant (as Mr. Velandia was, having overstayed a visa) who has not been involved in violent crime, and is married to a U.S. citizen will get the same kind of consideration that heterosexual couples in the same situation get.

This is a small story. It is really just about two men who won’t be separated because of immigration status. However the impact of this action could be huge indeed. The first aspect of it is obvious, if the federal government is starting to recognize marriages between people of the same sex for immigration purposes, that sends a huge signal to judges who are hearing the various challenges to marriage equality laws.

This is one of those “Put your money where your mouth is” moments. There are a lot of folks in the LGTB community who are rightly frustrated with a President and Administration that wants to claim the mantle of “fierce advocate” for equality but have moved very slowly and overly cautiously in this regard.

With this decision, and hopefully others to follow, the Obama Administration  has shown that it intends to act as if the law if finds unconstitutional does not exist. It is not letting Mr. Velandia off the hook, it is just putting his case at the bottom of the pile. Still it is hopeful sign that there will be the a level playing field for all informal immigrants who are married, regardless of the hetero or homosexual nature of that marriage.

So far no Wingnut’s head has exploded about this, but that is only a matter of time. This issue is a real two-fer for them. Not only is it able to be spun to show the Administration is soft on informal immigrants (which is completely not true, this administration has deported more people already than the Bush administration) but it is also part of their favorite hobby horse, marriage equality.

Expect to hear about this case and others like it from the Republican presidential candidates and the bloviaters on Talk Radio. They are going to say that it just shows how un-American our president is. They will talk about “Anchor-weddings” and the like, but I am not sure how much traction this will get.

For those who actually believe that marriage equality is somehow damaging to other marriages there is no chance that they would vote for this president anyway. The same goes for those who think that all our immigration issues can be solved by draconian laws which don’t actually remove the incentive of living and working in the United States.

The fact that the Obama Administration is not publicizing this shift in policy is just so like them. Here is an issue that they could point to with their base, with the LGTB voters and donors that they will need to win re-election, but because there will be a lot of foaming at the mouth by Teahadists and other conservative voting blocks they are just letting it go by quietly.

It is a political failure of a type that this Administration is far to prone to. They never seem to latch on to the fact that Democrats, Progressives and Liberals want to know all about the things, small and large, that the Executive Branch is doing to stick it to the pernicious policies of the Republicans. The failure to tout the actions that they do take which the base likes leaves them in a position where they are always getting flack from the Left and Right.

I am one of those folks that does not subscribe to the idea that the Obama Administration has done nothing or very little of value. But I completely get how many of my cohorts on the Left can feel that way. It is not just the big flashy announcements that make a difference, it is the policy that comes from them that really changes things on the ground.

Is it time to let the president off the hook on gay civil rights issues? Hell no! They are just getting into gear on this and while it is important to recognize the good things they do, there is no reason at all why anyone who cares about civil equality for LGTB citizens should let up now.

DADT, while in the process of being repealed has not stopped discharges. They will, eventually stop, but until that time we are still losing people who actually want to fight for their country over bigotry. That is a shame that the Administration should be reminded of daily.

However, we should also give credit where credit is due. In the case of separating two men who are married because of immigration status, the Obama Administration did the right thing. If they would only make a habit of that, then we (or at least I) could be a lot more enthusiastic about helping the president win another term.

The floor is yours.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips? Flames? (19+ / 0-)

    More of the same only louder?

    Getting Democrats together and keeping them that way is like herding cats that are high on meth, through L.A., during an earthquake, in the rain -6.25, -6.10

    by Something the Dog Said on Thu Jun 30, 2011 at 06:36:43 AM PDT

  •  Good news...hope it is official policy now... (8+ / 0-)

    This is the kind of policy we should have had all along. With NY now an equality state even more immigration cases may be removed.

    T&R for morning good news!

    Born again Cynic since 2008 when the patent medicine man came to town.

    by SallyCat on Thu Jun 30, 2011 at 06:40:53 AM PDT

  •  Small stories combined, create a larger narrative. (6+ / 0-)

    This is wonderful news for Henry and Josh.  I welcome the day when DOMA is finally, at last repealed.

  •  This is indeed good news (3+ / 0-)

    For both immigration advocates and people who believe in marriage equality and the like. It's not the first such case, I believe -- I'm pretty sure that Sullivan highlighted at least one other similar one a few weeks ago, but I can't remember the details.

    From the sounds of this and other stories, it seems good news is also rolling along for informal immigrants, as you put it, in general. The decision to move non criminal immigrants to the bottom of the pile, and to take other factors into consideration such as when they arrived in the US, if they are in school or college and so on. It, again, doesn't eliminate whatever laws, it just prioritizes enforcement, I guess it is.

    I don't actually agree with this part, though:

    It is a political failure of a type that this Administration is far to prone to. They never seem to latch on to the fact that Democrats, Progressives and Liberals want to know all about the things, small and large, that the Executive Branch is doing to stick it to the pernicious policies of the Republicans. The failure to tout the actions that they do take which the base likes leaves them in a position where they are always getting flack from the Left and Right.

    I don't think this is a political failure, the decision not to shout stuff like this from the rooftop. For one thing, President Obama has said from the beginning that he didn't want to keep fighting the same old battles. I think he wanted to, instead, pull some of them completely off the table.

    Not doable with a Republican congress, of course, but going with enforcing the law, but prioritizing and using common sense is a big step. What's to shout about? The laws are still in place, are still being enforced, but (once parts of ICE get over their snit) directives like this help ensure that the culture and fabric of the government agency undergoes a subtle, but hopefully permanent, change.

    The people to whom these policies matter... I mean, really matter, as in their lives are affected somehow... know. Believe me, immigration advocates, people who work with informal immigrants and of course many informal immigrants themselves, lgbt or straight, know or will soon know about this because it affects their lives deeply.

    Others who are not quite as involved, or not involved at all, may not at first realize what is going on, but what can you do? Republicans and right wingers may make a fuss about it eventually... but because they will be fighting a ghost, so to speak, I sincerely doubt it will get much traction.

    How would they frame it? "The Obama Administration has decided to go after criminals and people who may mean us harm and deport them first, instead of kids who have lived in the US since they were three years old! Shame!"  

    That doesn't seem like it would work so well. In the meantime, ICE and other agencies quietly go about their business, there is little shouting back and forth and the world doesn't end.

    Totally different scenario, though, if the admin touted this sort of thing as a change in policy or ignoring the laws or whatever. That would indeed give the right wing a handle for their opposition.

    Anyway, if it was my life, my wife, husband, child, livelihood, ability to walk down the street without fear, take my child to the doctor when needed, make sure my children were not in harms way when they went to school and so on... my concern would be the effect of the policies.

    I really would not care in the least whether Liberals, Progressives, Democrats, would get a little frisson of pleasure from having it shouted from the rooftops, or were frustrated because it wasn't handed to them wrapped in sparkly bows.

    People who need to know, people who make it their business to know, people who pay attention will know, and people who care and to whom this is important, life-changing news will know and the policy, likely, will just keep rolling along changing lives, one or two at a time. That would be enough for me.

    “If you have come to help me, you are wasting your time. But if you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together.”

    by Nanette K on Thu Jun 30, 2011 at 07:56:38 AM PDT

  •  Oh geeze...don't give them any ideas (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Something the Dog Said
    They will talk about “Anchor-weddings” and the like

    I'm hoping that it was you that coined this, and that you didn't hear it somewhere.

    "If I can't dance, then I don't want to be in your revolution"--Emma Goldman

    by ehrenfeucht games on Thu Jun 30, 2011 at 10:02:46 AM PDT

  •  first we get gay marriage (0+ / 0-)

    and women in combat ... I guess the only remaining obstacle to the Equal Rights Amendment will be unisex bathrooms.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site