Skip to main content

I don't make many posts. However when something comes up that summarizes something I have been seeing but haven't been able to put into words I feel a need to express myself. It's a shame that the visitors to this site already know that Fox News is not a fact news station because this is something others need to be made aware of. Even if they would do their best not to understand (It takes a lot of effort to avoid facts). Take note I avoided using the word truth because the fact is people create their own truths. It's easier to validate any point by calling it true. People think it gives the point some sort of significance when it it really doesn't.

I was motivated by a little piece I saw on an early morning show from Fox News. Everything about the they timing and the messengers was of great significance. The story led with the title "Don't take your kids to 4th of July parades they my become Republican. Really?" It was portrayed as a Harvard study that advised parents not to take their children to 4th of July parades in order to protect them from being right wing adults. The irony is the news story was an attempt to manipulate the findings of the study in the hopes of encouraging parents to take their children to parades to hopefully increase future republican numbers. Rather cynical. The larger irony was that the study was in part conducted by a Professor that studies propaganda and the news story about it was a propaganda piece.

The actual study titled "Shaping the Nation: Estimating the Impact of Fourth of July Using a Natural Experiment" Did not conclude that parents should not take their children to 4th of July parades. It does find that if a child has attended a 4th of July Parade he or she will be 2% more likely to identify with the Republican Party, 4% more likely to vote Republican, 3% more likely to make contributions and 0.9% more likely to vote. It does nothing in discouraging anyone to attend a parade. The only conclusion that was made is:

“We were surprised to find that childhood experiences of Fourth July celebrations could have such persistent effects. The evidence suggests that important childhood events can have a permanent impact on political beliefs and behavior and that Fourth of July celebrations in the US affect the nation's political landscape,”
 Yanagizawa-Drott

So? Fox creates a story where there's none. This is nothing new. It is important to take a look at what they were trying to do with the story. Most obvious is it runs on 4th of July morning for maximum impact; the study came out in May 2011. Could they have made more of an impact if they ran a few days earlier? Sure, but the message is not based on facts so it would be difficult to keep it in the cycle, god forbid someone interviews the person who conducted the study and discover it has nothing to do with discouraging attendance of 4th of July parades. 4th of July morning is also a guarantee that no one will bother to try and read into the study. Why would they run a story weak on facts apart from the fact that they are Fox? The story has been tried and tested in the blogs for the past few weeks so it will work.

What concerned me most was the impact the video on Youtube had. There was the usual Youtube user debate; the most hateful kind. But, it seemed no one had even bothered to read the study. It was all right vs left and "i hate both parties but I'm really on the right" against everyone else. The point was they were all dancing to Fox's tune because no one had read the story and everyone who could type on a keyboard was not the target of the propaganda. The reaction was just added bonus in diving people a little further.

This story was just given a little test drive by 3 low level Fox operatives. Will go it further? That depends on any further reaction to it. This is why it was first aired with a couple of insignificant people on air. It's too embarrassing for anyone with any dignity to run with it even in a place where dignity is lacking. It might be a build up to something else but it's clear that when they make their news they treat it like any other TV show it has to be tested first and there should be no time for any facts to catch up.

This is sad. To see such deliberate infliction of divisions in a society is horrible I hope it ends soon everything must come to end but this seems to to be spreading around the world just after the world had started learning what damage tactics like this cause. They create the smoke and let the people rage with fire.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  there are literally millions of studies out (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    crystal eyes

    there as profs and students all labor under production quotas to generate studies on all sorts of things.  Some studies are beyond horrible, most are flawed and some make it to the MSM.  Dream up any esoteric question and I guarantee there are studies out there.  However, most MSM neglects to vette studies as to their publication site, the academic and experiential credentials of the author(s) and if the study has been replicated.  Instead we only get the wackadoodle studies that inflame one group or another  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site