Skip to main content

Rupert Murdoch
The Atlantic:
After allegations surfaced that reporters working for The News of The World attempted to hack the phones of 9/11 victims, Attorney General Eric Holder said in Australia Friday that the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. Reuters reports:

"There have been members of Congress in the United States who have asked us to investigate those same allegations and we are progressing in that regard using the appropriate Federal law enforcement agencies," Holder told reporters.

The "members of Congress" he's referring to have come from both sides of the aisle. Attempting to hack 9/11 victims is too offensive to be ignored, no matter what party you're from.

Well, unless you work for News Corp., in which case you continue to do your sworn duty to mislead, obfuscate, and generally bullshit your way through things according to whatever talking points have come down the big pipe. The ever-vapid Fox and Friends took up that challenge:

Fox News finally addressed their parent company’s hacking scandal head on this morning, with Fox and Friends launching a comically sycophantic and pathetically inaccurate defense of News Corp. Host Steve Doocy and guest Robert Dilenschneider, a media consultant, agreed News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch has done “all the right  things” and argued that the scandal is way overblown. “For some reason, the public, the media, keep going over this, again, and again, and again” the guest said. “It’s too much,” he added, “We should move on.”

Fox's Friends, indeed.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Murdoch's lament (12+ / 0-)
    Whatever happened to looking forward?

    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; but in practice, there always is a difference. - Yogi Berra

    by blue aardvark on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:31:01 AM PDT

    •  Ask Bill Clinton about that (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      blue aardvark, ericlewis0

      Remember when America said, "Okay, we get it, Bill's a bad boy; now can we keep the country moving?"

      What did FoxSpews do about it???

      "People should not be afraid of their government; governments should be afraid of their people." --V

      by MikeTheLiberal on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:37:50 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  What do you know Doocy? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      blue aardvark

      9/11, Anthrax, Virginia Shooter, Iraq War...why are you so anxious to move on?  

      Oh and just one more thing...can you let me know about those huge lumps under your newsroom carpet?

      "now this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." W. Churchill

      by Thor Heyerdahl on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:03:16 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Life in prison for Murdoch and his minions would (0+ / 0-)

      not be long enough for justice to be done, given what his actions have destroyed in the politics of our Democracy. Life in prison with daily beatings would be more appropriate.

  •  Calling! (4+ / 0-)

    Time to move on! Time to move on!

    Maybe MoveOn.arrrrgggghhhh...

    "Back off, man. I'm a scientist."
    -- Dr. Peter Venkman

    by Eclectablog on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:32:20 AM PDT

  •  Not crossing my fingers. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RichM, Ken in MN

    This DOJ is known for its not-looking-backward position regarding crimes, especially involving large corporate or political players.

    I would be surprised if anything comes of this. Pleasantly surprised.

  •  "We should move on" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    to our standard Obama/Democrat bashing.  Hilarious.

    I thank the forced changeover to digital over analog tv every day because I only use the ancient 19" cumbersome tube for watching horrifying or hilarious movies:  Reservoir Dogs, No Country for Old Men, Fargo, Dr. Strangelove, Big Lebowski, etc.  More reality based as far as I'm concerned.

    " My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total." Barbara Jordan, 1974

    by gchaucer2 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:35:19 AM PDT

  •  Another name for Robert Dilenschneider? (3+ / 0-)

    White guy who's not Steve Doocey.

    (h/t Stephen Colbert)

    Umm, that's PRESIDENT Obama and SENATOR Franken, mr. o'reilly.

    by filby on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:35:31 AM PDT

  •  Yawn (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mpc 12, MikeTheLiberal, RichM, Ken in MN

    I'll get excited when Holder decides it's time to investigate torture, surveillance, or the evil deeds of Wall Street and the Banksters.

    Investigating Murdock when even staunch Republicans are demanding his head isn't courageous.

    There already is class warfare in America. Unfortunately, the rich are winning.

    by Puddytat on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:36:04 AM PDT

    •  Wrong... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ericlewis0, Nina Katarina's highly courageous.

      Anytime you move to extinguish evil, it's an act of courage.

      I would prefer the meat of a torture, Wall Street, C-Street or Blackwater investigation, but I'll certainly take the bread crumbs of a NewsCorp investigation. (Not that it's bread crumbs; it just fits the metaphor).

      When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in excess body fat and carrying a misspelled sign.

      by wyvern on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:46:00 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  These issues are mutually exclusive (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Nina Katarina

      It is entirely possible to be both completely wrong about some issues like torture and financial malfeasance, as the Obama DOJ is and be right on the mark in doing its duty to investigate News Corp.

      "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."

      by dankester on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:03:10 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  My point is that this (0+ / 0-)

        is a no brainer.  No political consequences when even staunch Republicans are throwing their former good buddy under the bus.  To promote this investigation as something meritorious misses the point.

        I'll be the first to stand and cheer when real investigations commence.

        PS - The Obama administration is apparantly willing to look backwards and not just forwards on this one.  How about some others.  It's only been 3 years.

        There already is class warfare in America. Unfortunately, the rich are winning.

        by Puddytat on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 02:33:26 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I agree (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          With your premise, but don't get so jaded you cannot see any positives at all.  

          "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."

          by dankester on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 05:45:25 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  You're right (0+ / 0-)

            but I'm not just jaded, I'm fire spitting angry that the bad guys got off the hook again.  Just like the Iran-Contra criminals from the Reagan administration (and for the same stupid reasons).

            I do see positives, but the positives are overwhelmed with the fact Leona Helmsley was right.  Only the little people pay taxes get held accountable.

            There already is class warfare in America. Unfortunately, the rich are winning.

            by Puddytat on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:23:56 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  I would politely disagree (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The fall of murdoch and news corp in this country would have a much greater affect than the prosecutions.  A greatly diminished or non-existent faux news might eventually expose people to the truth of what is really going on.  Which then could lead to a greater chance that future government/corporate criminals be prosecuted.  

      While both are exciting, i currently see the fall of news corp a much more likely scenario.  And could also lead to the others, but not the other way around.

      •  News Corpse (0+ / 0-)

        is going to destroy itself through the drip drip drip of revelations as their past employees are going to be only too happy to cover their own asses.  They don't have friends or clout anymore.  Their past friends and allies have turned on them.  

        The main fear I have is that this will be more of a whitewash than an investigation.

        There already is class warfare in America. Unfortunately, the rich are winning.

        by Puddytat on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 02:36:03 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Let's be careful re the 9/11 victim hacking charge (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    greenbird, pengiep

    Could so easily be one of several 'inoculating' false accusations that surely Fox is helping to scatter amongst the valid charges.

    I ♥ President Barack Obama.

    by ericlewis0 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:37:24 AM PDT

  •  I keep telling myself (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pam from Calif, eataTREE

    this isn't schadenfreude, it's justice, at long, long last. Justice sure feels good.

    The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

    by sidnora on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:37:29 AM PDT

    •  Me, I'm fine with schadenfreude (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Nina Katarina, sidnora, pengiep

      But schadenfreude is defined as pleasure one takes at another's suffering, and, while embarassed, Murdoch isn't really suffering yet. When his empire actually begins to crumble and he's facing criminal charges, only then will I experience sweet, sweet schadenfreude.

      I support torturous regimes! Also, I kick puppies.

      by eataTREE on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:57:28 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  He may not be suffering yet (0+ / 0-)

        by our standards, or to the degree that he should, but make no mistake: for a man who's gotten everything, and I mean everything, he's wanted for the past 30 years at least, he's suffering. Starting to, anyway. I can only hope that what awaits fits your definition, and mine, as well.

        The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

        by sidnora on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:48:52 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I'll consider he's suffering when he's an inmate (0+ / 0-)

          in federal prison doing the rest of his life. Hate is not strong enough of a word to describe what I feel about that useless bag of skin.

          •  I try very, very hard not to hate. (0+ / 0-)

            Not because I don't think the objects of my impulse to hate deserve it, but because I think hate does more harm to the hater than the hated. In my case, for instance, chronic gastrointestinal problems.

            If I did hate, Murdoch would actually be at the top of my list. I believe he has done more harm to our country than any other single person in my fairly long lifetime. More than Cheney, Bush, Reagan, or Nixon. And I have thought that for a very long time.

            The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

            by sidnora on Sat Jul 16, 2011 at 11:46:11 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Not being snarky... (3+ / 0-)

    ...but I can't think of anything the Justice Department has done that makes me feel this will go anywhere.

    If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid.

    by Senor Frog on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:38:09 AM PDT

  •  I wonder, if this actually manages to bring down (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    redstater, SeaTurtle, DRo, corwin, AllanTBG

    Fox News (Very unlikely, but we can always dream.) Would it hurt Republican electoral prospects in the long and short term?

    I just don't see Republicans doing nearly as well without their alternate universe/propaganda outlet to bury their embarrassments and smear their opponents with half-truths and outright lies.

    Can I have my vision back? I will live outside your city walls. - "Ride With Me" Steppenwolf

    by 135790 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:38:57 AM PDT

    •  Probably won't bring them down completely (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      dankester, pengiep

      But it might put them on the defensive, especially if the allegations about the 9/11 victims have some merit. On top of that, Rupert is over 80, and Ailes is over 70, and they are the driving force behind Fox News. At the very least, they're probably not going to be as vigorous in the coming years, and this scandal might make Murdoch decide to hang things up. Without him in control, Ailes will probably continue to direct things at Fox News, but I suspect his extremism will get the better of him, and will cause a decline in the influence it has.

      Do Pavlov's dogs chase Schroedinger's cat?

      by corwin on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:01:55 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Right back at ya Rupert! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    "Power is a fleeting thing. One day your souls will be required of you." Bishop Peter Storey---Central Methodist Mission, Johannesburg, June 1981

    by lyvwyr101 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:39:35 AM PDT

  •  Again, I don't expect Murdoch to be troubled (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sue B, SeaTurtle, Linda in Ohio

    personally by these investigations; if nothing else, he will just keep throwing bodies out the door.

    But, combined with the drop in stock prices, and what those bodies may end up saying after being sacrificed, he may well be rendered toothless.

    When you've got a big Saudi stock holder making public statements about personnel matters, I think your web is probably coming unraveled.

    My interest, of course, is in his US holdings, particularly the broadcast stations.  In addition, if there is indeed proof of bribes being paid in Britain, he may indeed have run afoul of US law.

    Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.

    •  "he will just keep throwing bodies out the door." (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JC from IA

      Including his own children

      We agree our hair is on fire, we disagree with Paul Ryan's plan to use a sledgehammer to put out the fire

      by JML9999 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:41:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Ultimately up to the investors (0+ / 0-)

      Murdoch family control over the operation of News Corp is certainly in doubt, but that does not mean the end of the beast.  Ailes runs his own operation and he is very profitable.   Getting rid of him is going to be difficult.

      •  Faux news depends on news corp. (0+ / 0-)

        Faux news is merely an arm of news corp, just like all of the tabloid outlets murdoch owns.  It is the political arm that acts as a pr firm pushing the objectives of its parent company.  Remember, the dog wags the tail and not the other way.  
        A greatly weakened news corp will mean a$$hats like ailes will not have the same control that they currently enjoy.

    •  When you say Murdoch, you're referring to Rupert.? (0+ / 0-)

      Because son James may be in a world of shit....

  •  The amusingly.. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pam from Calif, SeaTurtle, singe, RichM

    ..ironic thing here is, once all the Fixed News rats begin to abandon the sinking ship, Doocy will probably be the first to go.

    Which reminds me:  In light of on-going developments,  who is going to start a pool on which Fixed News meatpuppet will, in the very near future,  "leave for a better job," or "leave because I want to spend time with my family?"

    My heart tells me Doocy, but my mind tells me BillO.

    When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in excess body fat and carrying a misspelled sign.

    by wyvern on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:40:15 AM PDT

    •  You, sir/madam, have a responsibility to this (0+ / 0-)

      community to set up that diary and have folks vote on your pressing question of the day.

      I know I myself am obsessed by what the Foxbots will do when NewsCorps stocks go in the crapper.  That gives me the reason to get up in the morning!

      Take up this call from the Community; we need you in this hour of breaking news.

      If one of us is denied civil rights, all of us are denied civil rights.

      by SeaTurtle on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  crackhammer. he is surely a plushie in hiding.n/t (0+ / 0-)
    •  But the question is, where would they go? (0+ / 0-)

      Even the a$$hats being hired at other news outlets are not being given the same power as those at the fake news outlet.
      And if news corp does start to fall I imagine the knives will be out and the wolves will start to circle.

  •  May Rupert Murdoch face the music. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Could a perp walk for the world's chief propagandist be in the offing?  That would be outstanding.

    -4.75, -5.33 Cheney 10/05/04: "I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11."

    by sunbro on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:40:16 AM PDT

  •  Yes move indictments!and guillotine! n/t (2+ / 0-)
  •  Thanks Hunter (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Linda in Ohio, annieli

    Schadenfreude feels good this morning

    It is a terrible thing to see and have no vision. ~ Helen Keller

    by Pam from Calif on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:41:07 AM PDT

  •  Hey Holder: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DRo, JC from IA, eataTREE, pengiep

    You don't even need to worry about the domestic spying. You can get the wrinkled old bastard on the foreign spying.

    Ideology is an excuse to ignore common sense.

    by Bush Bites on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47:02 AM PDT

    •  Actually, I'm thinking if the Brits prove bribery, (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bush Bites

      he may well have trouble with this US law.

      I understand it usually gets used for corporations paying off princes in third-world countries, but I think it may apply to Rupert, too, if there were bribes paid to British cops.

  •  Rupert to apologize today (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JC from IA

    Sounds like Burson-Marsteller's crisis management unit has been hired.

    Might be too late to "get out in front of this."

  •  Why does this strike me as funny? (0+ / 0-)
    “For some reason, the public, the media, keep going over this, again, and again, and again” the guest said. “It’s too much,” he added, “We should move on.”

    An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics - Plutarch

    by Anthony Page aka SecondComing on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:52:52 AM PDT

  •  If there's nothing to see here ... (0+ / 0-)

    ... why did they bring in Dilenschneider? He's a crisis management PR guy.

    "It does not require many words to speak the truth." -- Chief Joseph, native American leader (1840-1904)

    by highfive on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:53:35 AM PDT

  •  Good Lord. Anyone on Fox News (3+ / 0-)

    calling someone's coverage "Overblown" pushes the limits of incredulity.

    I mean, it would push the limits, if it were anyone but Fox News.

    My comments are not intended to be factual statements.

    by asm121 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 10:53:57 AM PDT

  •  I love the smell of (burning) FoxNews in the am (0+ / 0-)
  •  is ruppie's face filled with sand worms? n/t (0+ / 0-)
  •  Moving on (0+ / 0-)

    Yes, we should move on to more important things like ACORN, Planned Parenhood, etc.

  •  shut Fox down (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    dankester, pengiep

    This makes the NPR and the ACORN scandal look like chump change. But somehow Fox news isn't very interested in this scandal.
    Hopefully they will end up agreeing that we should shut Fox down.

    Apparenly I'm a sanctimonious purist!

    by mattinjersey on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:00:40 AM PDT

  •  My fantasy (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    KahluaKrazy, pengiep

    This scandal blows up SO big that Fox goes down the crapper and gets bought-out, dirt cheap, by Al Gore's Current TV.

    After all, we can "thank" Fox for calling Florida for G. W. Bush back in 2000.

    This ain't no party. This ain't no disco. This ain't no foolin' around!

    by Snud on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:01:15 AM PDT

  •  "They keep going over and over (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    it again"

    Kind of like Doocy went over and over and over the false madrassa story about Obama.

  •  Oh crap..... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    now the freeperville kombat keyboarders will make OBL into an icon, i.e. rovian/FOX revisionist histoy, and condemn his killing! No wonder the cheney boys kept him alive!!

    OBL reportedly targeted Obama for 9/11/11 attack

    CCR:"If you're a torturer, be careful in your travel plans. It's a slow process for accountability, but we keep going."

    by jimstaro on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:03:10 AM PDT

  •  "We" moved on from AT & T and other (0+ / 0-)

    telcos who, along with our governemnt,  "tapped" our phones illegally. Why not move along from this?  

    And who  gave them retroactive immunity?  

    DOJ is too busy dealing with unimportant issues such as  financial fraud, voter intimidation, and torture.

    But bring up New Corps and Murdoch, they are on it.

    " I’d say we all better get used to eating beans and rice, taking a beating on pitted roadways, and getting felt up by security personnel at the airports as Obama uses terrorism scares to keep us all in line." Roger D Hodge

    by Muggsy on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:03:46 AM PDT

  •  This is sure a turnaround from the eff you (0+ / 0-)

    attitude towards 9/11 victims for anything besides self-serving shameless promotion (that is if any action is taken other than having Ken Starr and Rudy Guiliani and Earl Warren on a double-secret-blue-ribbon panel) . "See, we need to go to war!" "Benefits for firemen injured in the cleanup? Take us to court!" "Husband killed in the WTC and you're against the war? Fuck you you whining traitor."

    "How I hate those who are dedicated to producing conformity." William S Burroughs

    by shmuelman on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:03:54 AM PDT

  •  No longer the "Obama DOJ?" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    But if it were something negative, you bet we would see a headline like this:

    "Obama Department of Justice now Investigating News Corp Allegations"

    Whenever it's something bad, the authors/diarists ALWAYS make sure to insert "Obama" in front of the "Department of Justice" to emphasize that it's Obama driving the negative action behind the DOJ. But when it's a positive act, the authors somehow forget to include the "Obama" in front of the rest.

    I've noticed this pattern on here. The bias in the front page articles which seek to associate this President with negative information while dissociating him from positive information. I will call the authors out as long as I continue to see this bias in reporting.

    •  Actually "Obama DoJ" would make the headline (0+ / 0-)

      sarcastic... as in "yeah right, they're going to 'investigate Fox'"  just like Bush and torturers.

      Just making it DoJ gives some semblance of hope that justice might actually be served, since the Obama DoJ only looks forward to gaybashing and prosecuting med marijuana and whistleblowers.

      Obama is "a good man" to many democrats like Bush was "a good man" to republicans.

      by The Dead Man on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:46:54 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I think the doj is traditionally called the doj. (0+ / 0-)

      No matter who is president. Some may put obama's name in for affect but for the most part the president's name is not usually included.  

  •  All is well, Rupert apologized. Feel better now ?? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Sounds like he's using the Dick Nixon gambit.  Each day admitting slightly more involvement until at the end he pretty much was completely involved and was calling the shots entirely.  It wasn't some rogue part-time employee that created the illegalities.

    He needs to spend time in jail with layers of his sycophants.  

    I think that Republicanism is revealing itself as a personality disorder, not so much an ideology." -- Naomi Klein

    by AllanTBG on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:06:23 AM PDT

  •  Think we could see a "trade off"? (0+ / 0-)

    We're hearing a lot about Holder & Co. being investigated about involvement/knowledge of "Fast and Furious".  Now, we're seeing Murdoch being accused of being involved in some pretty ugly stuff.

    Anyone else think we might see both of those thing kind of fade away slowly with not much fanfare in kind of a political trade off?

    Hey, stranger stuff happens in this wild and strange political world we see ourselves living in.

    -- **Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong.**

    by r2did2 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:21:44 AM PDT

  •  Please, Please, Please (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Senor Frog, pengiep, blw

    Dear God: All I want for Christmas is a criminial indictment against News Corp. I will be a good boy.  I promise to call my mother every day and stop using your name and your son's name in vain.  I will love my neighbor as I love myself (and you know that's a whole lotta lovin') because, if NewsCorp is criminally indicted, that will be the end of it. God, it is not like I am asking for a conviction, just an indictment.

    In your Holy name, Praise Jesus, Amen.

  •  hiya, huntie-baby. (0+ / 0-)

    here's a link to an earlier comment i made elsewhere, just so you can munch on something varietal.

    i'm with gracie allen and the 'surprise party:' our mascot is a kangaroo, and our motto is 'it's in the bag!'

    The Addington perpwalk is the trailhead for accountability in this wound on our national psyche. [ know: Dick Cheney's "top" lawyer.] --Sachem

    by greenbird on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:23:19 AM PDT

  •  anyone have (0+ / 0-)

    any sort of update
    on HBGary et al ?

    The Addington perpwalk is the trailhead for accountability in this wound on our national psyche. [ know: Dick Cheney's "top" lawyer.] --Sachem

    by greenbird on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:29:19 AM PDT

  •  Prediction: DoJ won't prosecute (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    it would not be "looking forward" to prosecute America's leading propaganda outlet.

    Obama is "a good man" to many democrats like Bush was "a good man" to republicans.

    by The Dead Man on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 11:43:51 AM PDT

  •  Just another day at the office..... (0+ / 0-)

    Just another appearance before Parliament....Just another criminal investigation on 2 continents...

    NO BIG DEAL....

  •  Fox News (0+ / 0-)

    purely coincidental I'm sure

  •  Fix News (0+ / 0-)

    coincidental, I'm sure.

  •  Fox News (0+ / 0-)

    Ok, Ill try one more time. If I can't get the link up just google U.K. Telegraph + Fox News.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site