Skip to main content

President Obama addressed reporters from the Whitehouse press room last night in what has to be the clearest language he has yet employed to express his position on the debt ceiling negotiations.

Clearly exasperated, Obama let in to the politically motivated obstructionist Republicans as he has never before. Although he dislikes laying blame, and states so again in the video, he clearly laid the issue at the feet of the GOP and their enablers.

Speaking up for the 'working stiffs' and 'ordinary folks', he confronted those causing the issue for "..being more worried about what some funder says, some talk radio show host says or some columnist says. Or what pledge we signed, back when we were trying to run or worried about having a primary fight."

He really nailed it. Video and transcript below the fold.


THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think what you should say -- well, here’s what I’d say: I remain confident that we will get an extension of the debt limit and we will not default. I am confident of that.

I am less confident at this point that people are willing to step up to the plate and actually deal with the underlying problem of debt and deficits. That requires tough choices. That’s what we were sent here to do.

I mean, the debt ceiling, that’s a formality. Historically, this has not even been an issue. It’s an unpleasant vote but it’s been a routine vote that Congress does periodically. It was raised 18 times when Ronald Reagan was President. Ronald Reagan said default is not an option, that it would be hugely damaging to the prestige of the United States and we shouldn’t even consider it. So that’s the easy part. We should have done that six months ago.

The hard part is actually dealing with the underlying debt and deficits, and doing it in a way that’s fair. That’s all the American people are looking for -- some fairness. I can’t tell you how many letters and emails I get, including from Republican voters, who say, look, we know that neither party is blameless when it comes to how this deft and deficit developed -- there’s been a lot of blame to spread around -- but we sure hope you don’t just balance the budget on the backs of seniors. We sure hope that we’re not slashing our commitment to make sure kids can go to college. We sure hope that we’re not suddenly throwing a bunch of poor kids off the Medicaid rolls so they can’t get basic preventative services that keep them out of the emergency room. That’s all they’re looking for, is some fairness.

Now, what you’re going to hear, I suspect, is, well, if you -- if the Senate is prepared to pass the cap, cut and balance bill, the Republican plan, then somehow we can solve this problem -- that’s serious debt reduction. It turns out, actually, that the plan that Speaker Boehner and I were talking about was comparable in terms of deficit reduction. The difference was that we didn’t put all the burden on the people who are least able to protect themselves, who don’t have lobbyists in this town, who don’t have lawyers working on the tax code for them -- working stiffs out there, ordinary folks who are struggling every day. And they know they’re getting a raw deal, and they’re mad at everybody about it. They’re mad at Democrats and they’re mad at Republicans, because they know somehow, no matter how hard they work, they don’t seem to be able to keep up. And what they’re looking for is somebody who’s willing to look out for them. That’s all they’re looking for.

And for us not to be keeping those folks in mind every single day when we’re up here, for us to be more worried about what some funder says, or some talk radio show host says, or what some columnist says, or what pledge we signed back when we were trying to run, or worrying about having a primary fight -- for us to be thinking in those terms instead of thinking about those folks is inexcusable.

I mean, the American people are just desperate for folks who are willing to put aside politics just for a minute and try to get some stuff done.

So when Norah asked or somebody else asked why was I willing to go along with a deal that wasn’t optimal from my perspective, it was because even if I didn’t think the deal was perfect, at least it would show that this place is serious, that we’re willing to take on our responsibilities even when it’s tough, that we’re willing to step up even when the folks who helped get us elected may disagree.

And at some point, I think if you want to be a leader, then you got to lead.

His frustration was on display as he gave the status of the failed negotiations between himself and the 'Conservative' leadership, members and media personalities.

Although he readily applied blame for the current state of the national debt on members of both major parties, he stressed that the current issue was the fault of republicans in the House and Senate, who care more about political posturing than governing, more about sending messages to their base than to the world's markets, and more about the rich and powerful than the average American.



Thanks for taking the time to read my Diary :¬)
Comments, TIPs
and RECs are gladly accepted

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    Liberals see George Orwell's 1984 as a cautionary tale. Conservatives see it as a blueprint.

    by DiegoUK on Sat Jul 23, 2011 at 06:42:41 AM PDT

  •  Tips, Leers & Jeers (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cedwyn, G2geek, MKSinSA

    I went oops, forgot to make my tip jar..


    Liberals see George Orwell's 1984 as a cautionary tale. Conservatives see it as a blueprint.

    by DiegoUK on Sat Jul 23, 2011 at 06:44:23 AM PDT

  •  Cutting SS and Medicare is channelling his inner (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Major Tom, dmnyct, hardhatmama


  •  Real Goal of "Talks" (0+ / 0-)

    Was to replace the lost revenue from making permanent tax cuts for the rich with savings from cutting Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.  The amount of revenue POTUS sought was always minimal compared to the size of the cuts and the lost revenue from the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich which were intended to become permanent and not expire.
    At the last, Republicans would not agree to any "revenue" while demanding permanent tax cuts.  Obama yo-yo'ed a plan which included huge cuts and "aspirational" revenue from a commission that would "overhaul the tax code."  There was tremendous pushback from everyone who knew what the game was and the "plan" was yo-yo'ed back.
    Don't forget the tax cuts would expire with no action.  That would solve the "shortfall" without cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.   All the haughty indignation from the President is bogus when the above is not known or forgotten.  None of the various "deals" were good for all us.  All assumed that the tax cuts for the rich would be permanent and the three programs had to be cut to provide replacement revenue to offset the tax cuts.

  •  Another Presser: December 2010 (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    December 2010 (video/text) was when POTUS Obama agreed to extend the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich while failing to raise the debt ceiling.  Watch his consternation when is asked about why the debt ceiling was not included in the "deal."  This at 22m 50s but you really should watch the whole thing.  Knowing what we know now, it is very revealing.

  •  What a load of shit (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    dmnyct, splashoil

    As if Obama himself isn't "more worried about what some funder (Wallstreet) says."

    And the very idea that Obama is "speaking up for the 'working stiffs' and 'ordinary folks',"  come on, wake up and join the real world.

    We are in this mess and countless others not because of the mean Republicans or the corporate media or any other bullshit excuse the left has offered to cover for Obama.  We find ourselves here today because Obama is a light weight, unwilling to fight for much of anything.  Add to the mix a Democratic party closer to corporate America than most are wiling to admit and you've got a recipe for disaster and a slow death of both our party and our country.

  •  I can't say I saw much of that (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    splashoil, hardhatmama

    "inner progressive" in the weekly radio chat.  Guess it left for vacation last night, after the presser?

    I'm one of those lucky homos in a bi-national relationship - at the age of 49, all I had to do was give up my career, leave behind my dying father, my aging, diabetic mother, my family & friends and move to the Netherlands. Easy peasey!

    by aggieric on Sat Jul 23, 2011 at 08:01:56 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site