Skip to main content

Well, I'm back with another round of redistricting ideas.  I know my first foray was sucky, but this time I've come back with better form.  I've started anew.

Anyway, this time I'll be doing a redistricting diary on West Virginia.  A state where Dems have a nearly 2:1 (~54% to roughly 29% to be exact) registration advantage.  They control all statewide offices and have a lopsided majority in the state legislature (65-35 in the House, 28-6 in the Senate).  Of course, the lion's share of them are conservative (in the primary for Governor this year, there was only one candidate who was overtly pro-choice).  It's probably the only state where a Democrat can lose a primary challenge from the right (see Mollohan vs. Oliverio).  However, despite the conservative lean of the state, the WV GOP hasn't caught a break since the days of Arch A. Moore.  Their only recent accomplishment to celebrate is narrowly winning WV-01 last fall.  This diary will have redistricting ideas that could move things back to a 2-1 or even 3-0 Dem advantage.

More below the fold.

From what I have heard in the scanty reporting on this matter, the committees have been drafting maps  during the month of July and will have an August special session to consider and approve them.

It should also be noted that Senate Majority Leader John Unger (D-Berkeley), Chair of the Senate Redistricting Committee, has been very open with the process.  His committee held hearings in every key county in the redistricting and reapportionment preliminary stage.  What this means for both parties is uncertain, but it seems that they'll avoid being egregious and put communities-of-interest first where possible.

Most importantly, West Virginia has a whole-counties provision in their state constitution and, according to Ballotpedia, their maximum allowed deviation is 0.22% (1359 people).  While my first hypothetical scenario exceeds it, my second scenario does not.

In drawing these maps, I used the county-by-county Senate special election results between then-Governor Joe Manchin and steel tycoon/occassional WV resident John Raese (h/t The NY Times ).  Under the current maps, Manchin won in all three congressional districts.  Each district I created was gauged solely as a percentage of the two-party vote (hence, the performance of the Mountain and Constitution Parties are excluded).  Afterwards, I found the partisan registration numbers for each county in West Virginia (h/t the WV SoS website ).  No changes were made based on the partisan numbers since they, for the most part, reflect the performance of Manchin and Raese.

Scenario 1: Vote-Sinking WV-02


Using the Manchin vs. Raese results, I added more Democrats to WV-01, had WV-02 take as many Raese counties as possible, and had WV-03 take the rest.  I also put Shelley Moore Capito's home  (Charleston in Kanawha County) in WV-03.  WV-03 is pushed westwards, but is still centered in coal country, so Nick Rahall won't be irked.  Finally, I left Rep. McKinley's hometown of Wheeling in WV-01, but under these new lines, Dems can definitely take him on.


For WV-01, I cut out the Republican counties of Grant, Mineral, Doddridge, and Ritchie.  It compensated by picking up the Democratic counties of Randolph, Webster, Braxton, and Wirt.  WV-01 no longer enters the Eastern Panhandle.

56.5% Manchin, 43.5% Raese
94.6% White, 2% Black, 1% Hispanic, 0.8% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.3% Other

Deviation: -1675


For WV-02, all of the counties dropped by WV-01 are picked up and WV-02 now takes all of the Eastern Panhandle.  To cause Shelley Moore Capito frustration, I took out her home of Kanawha County.  However, that also took away quite a bit of population.  Therefore, I had WV-02 take some of the softer Dem counties from WV-03 (except for Rahall's home of Raleigh County, of course).  This district now is one that voted for Raese over Manchin.

49.4% Manchin, 50.6% Raese
93.1% White, 3% Black, 1.7% Hispanic, 0.5% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.4% Other

Deviation: +3210


For WV-03, I squeezed it into the southwest corner of the state, a region just as Democratic as its regional neighbor, eastern Kentucky.  Joe Manchin won by a greater than 2:1 margin of the two-party vote in four counties here.  I don't know if Rahall will like having Charleston in his district, but he already had Huntington, so he isn't averse to cities in his district.

59.7% Manchin, 40.3% Raese
91.8% White, 5% Black, 0.9% Hispanic, 0.7% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.5% Other

Deviation: -1536

Scenario 2: Drawn Together and Share the Wealth


Now, we get more partisan.  Here,  I drew Reps. McKinley and Capito into the same district (WV-01).  The new WV-02 takes the leftovers from the current WV-01 and WV-02 (as well as a few from WV-03).  WV-03 is closer to its current cofiguration than in the previous scenario.  Democratic strength is relatively even between WV-01 and WV-02, so Democratic opportunities are promising in both.


Here, I started with Capito's home of Kanawha and moved along the western “coast” northwards to the Northern Panhandle, the home of Rep. McKinley (and Acting Senate President Kessler).  Most of the rest of the counties currently in WV-01 are carved out and put in WV-02.  In order to have an acceptable population deviation, I had to include Grant County without using Tucker County as a bridge.  Although it doesn't look like Preston and Grant County touch, rest assured that they do.

54% Manchin, 46% Raese
92.8% White, 3.5% Black, 1% Hispanic, 1% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.5% Other

Deviation: -1098


WV-02 is now Capito-less and includes WV's central counties and most of its Eastern Panhandle.  It's less Democratic than the first, but not by much.

53.4% Manchin, 46.6% Raese
93% White, 3% Black, 1.8% Hispanic, 0.5% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.5% Other

Deviation: +488


Not much to say here.  It loses Greenbrier and Pocahontas Counties and takes in a few western counties.  Rahall should be happy with this.  Let's just hope that his next Republican opponent doesn't  use Rahall's Arabian heritage as fodder for an attack ad like “Spike” Maynard did.

58.5% Manchin, 41.5% Raese
93.7% White, 3.6% Black, 0.8% Hispanic, 0.5% Asian, 0.2% Native American, 1.2% Other

Deviation: +609

And that's all.  I hope you like this far better than my previous diary, which was a amateurish first attempt at map-drawing.

With these maps, WV Democrats can gain back what they lost in 2010 (and maybe then some).  I hope that those drawing the real maps have their proposals out soon so we can pore over them.

8:14 PM PT: Some articles from the past week on the process:

Wed Jul 27, 2011 at 9:18 PM PT: Probably one of the most informative articles on this yet:

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site