Skip to main content

When the Republicans first threatened to fail to raise the debt ceiling – in other words, require the U.S. to welsh on its legally incurred debts and throw all those dependent on government payments under the bus, no doubt triggering a national and international economic meltdown - the appropriate response from Obama should have been to go to the public and call these miscreants the traitors that they are.  If they had threatened to blow up the Capitol building or the White House, they would have been much less pernicious.  He also should have emphasized the mind-boggling hypocrisy of the Republicans, crying crocodile tears over the deficit that their reckless policies had made inevitable.

The proper approach to dealing with these juveniles would be to demand on an up-or-down vote on the debt ceiling extension, with zero strings attached.  Obama could announce that, if congressmen voted against it and the extension was not approved, everyone in the U.S. and the world would know who was responsible for the ensuing disaster.  Then, if the Tea Partiers took the bait and blocked approval, Obama could evoke the 14th amendment, after waiting a few days for the implications of this criminal act to become apparent to everyone.  And the ensuing slaughter of Republicans in the 2012 elections would be wondrous to behold.

Instead, Obama viewed this as a golden opportunity to drive a “grand bargain” that would solve our National Debt problem in coming years.  Anyone who thinks that the current group of Republican psychotics in congress would approve a grand deal that was even approximately compatible with the long-term welfare of our middle-class (and those less well off), or with the immediate need to boost government spending to cope with our current jobless crisis, is an imbecile.  And Obama is no imbecile.  Obama – the politician who chose Lieberscum as his mentor when he entered the Senate – consciously chose to sell out the interests of the middle-class, to curry favor with Wall Street and the mythical “centrist” voters who are fine with having their Social Security and Medicare benefits slashed in coming years.

Clearly, we do need to find a way to a way to control our burgeoning National Debt. The fix required will entail tax increases (preferably, expiration of the grossly irresponsible Bush tax cuts), a major reduction in our pointless military empire, and strategies for preventing the costs of medical care from soaring even higher (probably entailing a public option that would enable the government to bargain for lower prices).  But none of these elements could be achieved legislatively until American voters wake up and relative sanity is restored to congress.  Now is NOT the time for a "grand bargain"!

It looks like Democrats in congress are nonetheless willing to cave by approving a deal that will decisively cut government spending – beginning now, when such a cuts would have a devastating impact – without tax increases.  Even if such a deal allegedly holds The Big Three harmless, it would still be wholly unacceptable.  In fact, I would argue that any “deal” is unacceptable.  The Republicans should get NOT ONE CENT of concession for their criminal behavior.

What is it about “you don’t negotiate with terrorists” that Obama and the Dems don’t understand?!  

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  They are very very bad at negotiating with the (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Otteray Scribe

    republic terrorist hostage takers.  Have been for years and years now.  Many of them should just change party.

  •  Here's how to do it. You don't vote for a clean (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JeffW

    bill, then no money goes to the district of ANY representative who voted against it.

    That includes Defense contracts, military pay for base soldiers, Social Security, etc etc.

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White

    by zenbassoon on Tue Jul 26, 2011 at 01:11:30 PM PDT

    •  It just dawned on me (0+ / 0-)

      Refusing to pay the debts......they created......partially or mostly.  Two Wars....NCLB...Taxcuts for the wealthy....
      Would this not make them liable in a treasonous way?
      We all know this  but I think there may be something absolutely unconstituional about defaulting on a debt especially those made under their party's administration.

      We the People have to make a difference and the Change.....Just do it ! United Veterans of America

      by Vetwife on Tue Jul 26, 2011 at 02:17:35 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thus the 14th Amendment but I (0+ / 0-)

        mean   .......there are some traitors and now we add them to the list of War criminals as well.  

        We the People have to make a difference and the Change.....Just do it ! United Veterans of America

        by Vetwife on Tue Jul 26, 2011 at 02:24:28 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Treason has a very specific legal meaning (0+ / 0-)

        It's not a fit here, although their actions are really stupid and irresponsible. Personally, I am thinking that a default may just be the lesson this country needs. We have had years of bullshit posturing and extremists running amok without any of them and their supporters having to face the ultimate consequences of their actions. Most of the average folks supporting these nuts are the very people who would suffer worst  from a default. I know it's an awful thought but perhaps they ought to experience a true economic calamity in order to finally flush this crap out of their heads. I do understand that we will all suffer tremendously as a result of a default but, if we have to go through the fire, let's make sure that it isn't in vain.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site