Skip to main content

Yesterday, I Twittered:

Majority of Americans: Please raise taxes on billionaires. Congress: Herp derp screw the middle class! Majority: #fuckyouwashington

Senator Bernie Sanders says essentially the same thing, but more eloquently than I did:

The rich are getting richer. Their effective tax rate, in recent years, has been reduced to the lowest in modern history. Nurses, teachers and firemen actually pay a higher tax rate than some billionaires. It’s no wonder the American people are angry.

More beyond the great orange circle of freedom.

Many corporations, including General Electric and Exxon-Mobil, have made billions in profits while using loopholes to avoid paying any federal income taxes. We lose $100 billion every year in federal revenue from companies and individuals who stash their wealth in tax havens off-shore like the Cayman Islands and Bermuda. The sum of all the revenue collected by the Treasury today totals just 14.8% of our gross domestic product, the lowest in about 50 years.

In the midst of this, Republicans in Congress have been fanatically determined to protect the interests of the wealthy and large multinational corporations so that they do not contribute a single penny toward deficit reduction.

If the Republicans have their way, the entire burden of deficit reduction will be placed on the elderly, the sick, children and working families. In the midst of a horrendous recession that is already causing severe pain for average Americans, this approach is morally grotesque. It’s also bad economic policy.

The whole thing isn’t very long, and it’s worth your time to give it a read.

It’s just a fact that the GOP caused this “crisis”, and the lunatic fringe in the House is entirely responsible for it … but the White House and Democrat response to it has been pathetic. Even though public opinion is overwhelmingly against the GOP position, Obama and the White House have allowed the GOP to control the “debate” — which is really little more than stupid kabuki, anyway.

The way I see it, there are two options to explain the behavior from Obama and Senate Democrats: 1) They really are that incompetent, and completely got themselves rolled or 2) They want to slash federal spending that helps the poor and the middle class, and the lunatic fringe of the GOP is giving them the cover they need to please their corporate masters.

I’m not sure which it is, to be honest, though it seems that Obama wants his base to be furious with him (so he can go after the ever-changing “center” that will never support him the way his base did until he sold us out over and over again) and he seems more interested in presiding over some huge “compromise” with the lunatic fringe of the GOP than he is in protecting the people he supposedly serves.

I think it’s just an unavoidable truth: Barack Obama isn’t the great Hope he lead us to believe he was. He’s a weak negotiator, he’s a corporate tool, he doesn’t care at all about the least among us, and he isn’t willing to fight for anything. This president isn’t the guy I supported during the election, and he is a tragic failure for progressives.

I’m angry because the government of my country has abandoned its people, and I don’t think there’s anything we can do to take it back.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Where are the "trickle down" jobs? This question (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CleverNickName, DaleA, MadRuth

    needs to be asked everyday to every House and Semate member.  Don't quit calling now.

  •  I knew Obama was no (4+ / 0-)

    ...liberal; I saw him as a moderate, maybe center-left type at best. I never saw him as a full-on Progressive, much less a (snicker) "socialist".

    But I have to say, he's surprised me with just what a right-leaning corporate puppet he is. I see little difference between him and W. at this point; Obama just started out with far, far better PR.

  •  I hope Bernie runs third party (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the issues he and other progressives care about will not get a hearing otherwise.

    •  Did you mean other than him already being (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      the longest serving independent in Congress?

      Words are, in my not-so-humble opinion, our most inexhaustible source of magic. Capable of both inflicting injury, and remedying it. ~Professor Albus Dumbledore

      by Ana Thema on Sun Jul 31, 2011 at 08:33:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Everyone who runs for Prez (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DaleA, MadRuth

    has to lie about who they really are. But Obama actually ran close to what he has turned out to be. I remember the vehemence with which Hillary Clinton was assailed on this site, and how Obama was glorified as the savior of liberalism. But, seriously, today would we really have seen much difference between their administrations? Maybe one little difference: at least Hillary knew there was a rightwing conspiracy and would have been ready for it.

    •  That's not a little difference (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      That was the difference that made me prefer Hillary, though I wasn't passionate about either of them.  Hillary would not have pursued "bipartisanship" with the Republicans, because she knows how relentless they are.

      I could buy a parrot and train it to say, `tax cuts,' but at the end of the day, it's still a parrot, not a conservative.

      by MadRuth on Sun Jul 31, 2011 at 03:15:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  "Taking it back" is really (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    a Teabagger frame in the first place. They've already got our government by the balls, and Grover's standing by with his ever ready bathtub to finish it off. We will have to do for ourselves whatever needs doing, as we are the ones who do all the working and paying and living and dying in our communities.

    If our government and economic system no longer exist to serve us, we can rightfully withhold our support from them.

    "No taxation without representation" has a nice ring to it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site