Skip to main content

By Paul Zulkie

Yesterday, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Alejandro Mayorkas announced a series of policy initiatives designed to “fuel the nation's economy and stimulate investment” by attracting foreign entrepreneurs who can invest in fields of high unemployment, create jobs, and form startup companies. It is encouraging that USCIS recognizes that immigrant entrepreneurs and innovators are a key to continued growth and to maintaining America’s competitive edge into the 21st century.  It’s important that the agency keep this recognition in mind as it adjudicates visa petitions and applications.

The release of the USCIS guidelines coincided with a meeting in Palo Alto, CA, of the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. The meeting, which included a number of Silicon Valley CEOs—including Facebook—highlighted the need for reforms in both educational and immigration policies. As the participants in the meeting explained, the struggling U.S. economy needs more entrepreneurs and highly skilled workers who can help to create jobs. For this to happen, the U.S. educational system must draw more students into high-tech fields, while the U.S. immigration system must attract (and retain) more foreign talent.

The importance of immigrant entrepreneurs in fueling U.S. economic growth and job creation was the subject of a June report by the Partnership for a New American Economy. The report, entitled The “New American” Fortune 500, finds that immigrants founded 18 percent of all Fortune 500 companies. These companies generate $1.7 trillion in annual revenue and employ 3.7 million workers worldwide. The report argues that this is evidence of how immigrants “create American jobs and drive our economy.” However, notes the report, the U.S. immigration system often forces immigrant entrepreneurs away, rather than welcoming them.

And if the United States drives them away, there are other places they can go.  As an April report from the Kauffman Foundation describes, many highly educated and skilled immigrants are opting to return to their home countries and start successful businesses there. The authors of the report, entitled The Grass is Indeed Greener in India and China for Returnee Entrepreneurs, interviewed nearly 300 returnees in India and China who had started their own businesses. Some interviewees cited the difficulty in getting a U.S. “green card” as a reason for returning home, but the biggest reasons had to do with family ties and with improved quality of life and career opportunities in India and China. In other words, China and India are becoming increasingly competitive in the global market for highly skilled professionals and the United States risks falling behind. According to the report’s lead author, Vivek Wadhwa of Duke University, “Innovation that would otherwise be happening here is going abroad. Without realizing it, we are exporting our prosperity and strengthening our competitors.”

Yesterday’s announcement is significant because DHS is acknowledging that the way it has applied existing immigration laws has hurt rather than helped the economy and job creation.  The announcement sends a clear message to the rank and file employees of DHS that the agency needs to be more business friendly. Hopefully, yesterday’s announcement will be the first of many areas where the administration can change the way it interprets and applies existing immigration laws to facilitate economic and jobs growth in the US.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Give me a break. (5+ / 0-)

    The IPC is highlighting this tiny category in pursuit of its desire to liberalize immigration/legalization for everyone else.  

    Then there's a whole other issue of the global and local ethics of the US cherry-picking the world's best and brightest as opposed to cultivating our own.

    I'll Rochambeau you for it.

    by Rich in PA on Wed Aug 03, 2011 at 01:06:07 PM PDT

  •  The United States remains the top (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rich in PA

    higher education destination for international students (Open Doors/IIE).  Most graduate students are able to get funding and in fact, more than 45% of all international graduate students receive their funding from the college or university that they attend through non-federal sources.  (Open Doors/IIE)

    In terms of entrepreneurs, if they are willing to invest funds into the US, it is pretty easy to do business in the US.  

    I cannot believe that suddenly we are hearing that people are going to immigrate to the US and bring us jobs.

    I am very much an open borders person and work with students that want to study in the USA, but this story does not stack up with my 14 years of work in international education. In fact, based on my experience, this all sounds like smoke screen for some other agenda that will probably do none of us any good.  

    It gets on my nerves, and you know how I am about my nerves...

    by ciganka on Wed Aug 03, 2011 at 03:10:46 PM PDT

  •  The problem is that (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    IT Professional

    we continue to admit immigrants legally who are, on average, much less well educated than native-born Americans, so they simply compete for jobs with the poorest Americans. We are also still getting 300,000 illegal immigrants a year, who have the same effect.

    And the notion that we should be upset every time the citizens of poor countries create jobs and further economic progress in their countries is obscene. If the Chinese and Indians produce innovations we can license and use them to make our country better, just as everyone else does. Finland and South Korea don't compete by issuing more patents than anybody else, or by trying to import every foreigner with a college degree. They do it by educating their own people to a high standard. That is the key to technological excellence.

    Part of the reason American kids don't go into technical fields is that they know they will have to compete with a horde of foreign grad students who are granted work visas when they graduate.

    Immigrants are currently 15% of the workforce. The percentage was probably higher than that when almost all the Fortune 500 companies were founded. That 18% were founded by immigrants just says that immigrants are just like everybody else, not systematically better.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site