Skip to main content

(Cross posted at Blue Virginia)

The mark of the most backwards and destructive governments in history has been their suppression of science, reason and intellectuals in favor of paranoid conspiracy theories.

So listen to likely GOP presidential frontrunner Rick Perry: "There are a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects."

You may have become so used to hearing such comments from right wing political rabble rousers and phone-hacking media outlets that they don't shock you anymore. If so, think about this: a man who could conceivably become president is proposing to lead a witch hunt against scientists for the crime of seeking the truth. In memory of the victims of past mass hysterias, let's call it The Climate Libel.

When times are bad, sometimes the people choose a leader like FDR, with the positive vision to pull them out of the rut into a better world.  And sometimes, in desperation, they choose a leader like the guys FDR had to defeat.

Scapegoating is a tried and true political tactic almost as old as civilization itself.  After a natural disaster, the ancient Greeks would drive a beggar, crook or disabled person into exile in order to purify the city.  Scapegoating since has ranged from the Salem Witch Trials to Southern lynch mobs to the McCarthy era to the bloodbaths of Nazi Germany, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda.  

Many of these cases have a few characteristics in common. It's important to note these in order to anticipate the pattern and be ready to defend our scientists if they are indeed the next class to be thrown to the wolves so as to rile up the masses and distract everyone from what's really going on.  

1.  Sponsors – Witch hunts typically start with a motive and powerful and/or wealthy backers.  Often, political leaders use scapegoating as the cheapest and ugliest way to gain a mass following.  Mao Zedong started the Cultural Revolution and its bloody mass war on intellectuals in order to win an internal party struggle.  The current wave is notable for the financial interests involved -- the documented fact that Koch Industries (and originally, Exxon-Mobil) set up and funded today's network of climate denial websites, NGOS and academics-for-hire.  And then the Kochs funded Tea Party groups like Americans for Prosperity and Freedomworks, which they have infused with climate conspiracy rhetoric.

2.  Targets – The next essential ingredient is a group you can bully. The Nazis chose Jews, gays, disabled people -- groups they could abuse and exploit with impunity.  The Khmer Rouge, following Mao's Cultural Revolution pattern, chose intellectuals -- an understandable choice, since the well-educated arouse public jealousy for their cognitive skills and elite status and are most likely to defend themselves only with abstruse papers that the masses can't understand anyway.  Clearly, intellectuals, specifically climate scientists, are being chosen as public enemy #1 again.

3. Conspiracy theories – Rather than simply targeting these groups, the ringleaders typically concoct extensive conspiracy theories about them, from the wild stories of witnesses at the Salem witch trials to the Protocls of the Elders of Zion to the alleged communist conspiracies of the McCarthy Era.  The mobs may not be sufficiently riled up unless you make them believe the most dastardly fantasies about their targets, that they want to rape your women, steal your money and control the world.  (Often the most powerful conspiracy theories come from proponents projecting their own fantasies of power onto their targets.)

The most effective crafter of climate change conspiracy theories, not surprisingly, was an accomplished fiction writer, Michael Crichton, with his bestselling though scurrilous 2004 novel, State of Fear.  He spread the myth that climate change is all a hoax perpetrated by greedy scientists and evil environmentalists -- a myth that, owing much to his efforts, persists.

4.  Disseminators – These conspiracy theories of course need media outlets to get them to the masses. In other countries, that may be the Propaganda Ministry.   In the US, that usually means mass media figures who increase their popularity by funneling people's frustrations into hatred and resentment of chosen scapegoats.  That's been the case from the anti-Semitic Father Coughlin in the 1930s to Rush Limbaugh and Fox News today.  The way in which these bloviators twisted a bunch of harmless emails into something they had the nerve to call "climategate" tells you all you need to know.  

5. Demagogic leaders – Even when all the other factors are present, you won't have a true mass scapegoating until a leader steps in to advance the cause.  It's difficult to even think about any of the witch hunts and massacres I've mentioned without also remembering their infamous leaders. This is precisely why Perry's embrace of the Climate Libel is so ominous. It has the potential to turn this simmering mania into an outright mass hysteria.

6.  Mobilized masses – The final ingredient is the followers themselves.  No mass scapegoating succeeds until the mobs themselves get into the act.  That is ultimately the whole point, as in any movement – to have the flock demonstrating their dedication through action.  Unfortunately, in the kinds of movements we’re talking about here, the actions in question tend to be extremely perverse and even deadly.  

Sadly, we’ve seen that proven only weeks ago in Oslo, where a sociopath used climate denial rhetoric, among other right wing propaganda, to justify the cold blooded murder of scores of people, most of them kids.  How long before someone here in the US uses the Climate Libel to justify attacking innocent scientists or others?  

We have been lucky in the US for a few decades at least, as the country has generally trended toward greater tolerance and rationality.  But we need to keep our eyes open to the possibility that such a trend may be ending, and a New Dark Ages – where intellectuals are sacrificed, one way or another, to the combined force of elite money and mob anger – could be on the way.  

We need to be alert to that danger and commit ourselves to fight it with the kind of energy and determination that will take us to every doorstep in the nation, so we can spread another kind of message, reminding Americans who we are and what we truly stand for.  

No more witch trials.  No more conspiracy theories.  No more scapegoats.  Just truth, reason, openness and tolerance.  That’s the answer to the threat Rick Perry and the other climate deniers pose to America’s greatest traditions.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  If you really believe this: (5+ / 0-)
    "There are a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects."

            Which side has the deeper pockets, the Energy Companies or environmentalists? Somewhere around 98% of real scientists are convinced that climate change is real and caused by human activity. This large percentage is competing for the "big bucks" of the environmental lobby while the other 2% are willing to accept "penury"  doing the bidding of the hard pressed energy sector. Hmmmm.

    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. H. L. Mencken

    by irate on Fri Aug 19, 2011 at 04:17:11 AM PDT

  •  Not a fan. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sandbox

    A good effort, but the echoes of "blood libel" are way too creepy and veer on the offensive.

  •  For best results the percieved threat must be (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kindler

    existential - that is the way of life or existence of the audience is threatened by the activities of the target group. In the case of the aptly named Climate Libel mentioned here the nature of this existential threat really came into focus during the Copenhagen conference.

    "Climategate" emerged just prior to this conference, which President Obama announced he was going to attend. You had Republican Senators rushing to go over and specifically undermine anything the President might agree to. The fear that was being stoked in right wing circles wasn't about climate change - since that was assumed to be a hoax - but about the rich world's response to climate change. Specifically the fears were centered on two potential outcomes as the right saw it:

    1. One world government
    The crisis of climate change would stampede countries into a unified response leading to one world government. The right was already in a tizzy about the global "love affair" with President Obama - and (projecting again) worried that dark forces would exploit global fears to advance their agenda of global domination.

    2. Massive transfer of wealth to the undeserving poor countries of the world.
    This one is a bit strange but basically its a variant of the "reparations" smears Rush Limbaugh loves to talk about. The "logic" derives from the idea that the rich world (aka USA), being held as most responsible for the problem will be made to feel sufficiently guilty to literally bankrupt their economies in order to pay vast sums to money to regimes that torture their own citizens.

    I think it is important to confront these specific fears since the prospect of scientists "lining their pockets" is not really going to mobilise the masses. Both of these outcomes, as perceived by the gullible audience, are obviously existential and do create the necessary "its either them or us" context to excite the base.

    •  There's a kernel of truth to both of those, (0+ / 0-)

      probably.  In order to get around collective action problems there will probably have to be some international regime or, at a minimum, treaty.  Just like people talk about WTO "taking" some of US sovereignty by dint of our obligations to WTO rules, it's not unreasonable to describe adherence to climate treaties / bodies in similar terms.

      re: 2: I'd be very surprised if some sort of redistributive scheme weren't a common remedial proposal.  Since our climate externalities cause harm to other - often poorer - nations, it would stand to reason that we would compensate those harmed.  Compelling someone that creates externalities to internalize those costs via wealth transfer is a very common remedy across all sorts of areas of law.

      •  agreed, and that makes them more effective. (0+ / 0-)

        As you point out, binding mechanisms for enforcing compliance with CO2 reduction are not "One World Government", but to an audience that can be persuaded about "Death Panels" in a health care bill, making the leap from treaties to world government won't be too hard.

        On the second point, there will be wealth transfer, or mass migration, or both. The cost of doing something now is far less than the cost of inaction, but that's a sophisticated nuanced concept which is perceived by this audience as simply more evidence of duplicity.

        The US media are beyond irresponsible - they can do much to actually inform their audience and instead they run scared - of what I'm not sure, its not Mexico.

  •  The idea of scientists "lining their pockets" (0+ / 0-)

    is laughable.

    Come to my house, visit my friends, come to a big international meeting.

    the number of people making more than 150 thousand dollars a year is miniscule.

    That said, yes, we are being targeted. Not to the same degree or with the same fervor and hatred of many of the other groups referenced in the diary... but it's still happening.

    The only way to ensure a free press is to own one

    by RedDan on Fri Aug 19, 2011 at 05:34:04 AM PDT

  •  It's more than that... (0+ / 0-)

    Besides being such a abstract, controversial term, "libel" doesn't begin to describe what is happening right now.

    If so, think about this: a man who could conceivably become president is proposing to lead a witch hunt against scientists for the crime of seeking the truth. In memory of the victims of past mass hysterias, let's call it The Climate Libel.

    By obturating and manipulating the sound, scientific conclusions on climate change and other fundamental, accepted theories like evolution -- make no mistake about it -- the Republicans are waging a full-scale war on the very future of mankind.

    These extreme, disinformation campaigns coming from the right must end if we're to ever solve our problems.

    "Corporations have neither bodies to kick nor souls to damn." -- Andrew Jackson, 7th President of the United States

    by markthshark on Fri Aug 19, 2011 at 05:39:52 AM PDT

  •  One is reminded of (0+ / 0-)

    Galileo Galilei: "Eppur si muove" ("And yet it moves").  

    It is not substantiated, but rather is an apochryphal tale that he whispered this when convicted in 1633 of heresy before the Inquisition.

    But it makes for a great story of conviction in the face of ignorance.

    Torture is Wrong! We live near W so you don't have to. Send love.

    by tom 47 on Fri Aug 19, 2011 at 07:06:34 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site