Skip to main content

In a move that surprised absolutely no one, the US government today made a formal announcement of two intentions vis a vis Palestine:

1)    That if the Palestinian Authority (PA) seeks recognition at the UN, the US will veto it, and
2)    If the Palestinian Authority seeks recognition from the UN General Assembly (where the US lacks a veto), then the US will move to cut off all aid to the Palestinian Authority.

"If the Palestinian Authority insists on going to the Security Council, the U.S. will use the veto," he told Erekat during a meeting in the West Bank city of Jericho, according to a statement issued by Erekat's office.

"And in case the Palestinian Authority seeks to upgrade its position at the UN through the General Assembly, the U.S. Congress will take punitive measures against it, including a cut in U.S. aid," he said.

As I said, this move surprised no one, but it is not meaningless.  At a time when people across the Middle East are demanding more and more freedom and control of their own states, and at a time they are protesting Israeli attacks on Gaza and the killing of at least five Egyptian policemen, this move further isolates the US and damages its standing in that region.  Likewise, the hypocrisy in the US position of officially supporting the creation of a Palestinian state while doing everything in its power to block that creation, weakens the US globally.  Finally, forcing the vast majority of the world to vote against the US and act in direct defiance of US positions only weakens our influence.

A deeper effect is on the PA.  The PA has long suffered from a lack of deep support or enthusiasm from the Palestinian population it supposedly represents.  Years of corruption, ineffectuality, and answering to outside interests have taken their toll.  The PA has for months been building to this campaign to seek recognition at the UN.  For it to halt this action now, in the final days and at the demand of a foreign power, would destroy the last vestiges of authority in the PA and ensure that the Palestinian people would bring it down, whether by popular protest or a coup.

However, the US and Israel (which has also made threats to cut off the PA) together control the purse strings of the PA, and the PA largely survives as a patronage network.  Of the purse is closed, then the patronage ends, and the PA is likewise guaranteed to fall.  Thus, if the US is serious about its threat, then the US is effectively driving a stake into the heart of the PA.  

The era of the PA is likely ending.  This fact does not spark great worry on either side directly involved, however.  The PA is largely a tool for maintaining the status quo in Palestine.  The Palestinians have little love for it, of course, because they hate the status quo.  Israeli have little love for it because either the too dislike the status quo, or if they like it then they feel they can maintain the status quo through direct military force without the PA involvement.  

About the only people who really love the PA are the US and Europe.  For them, the PA acts as a bandage over Palestine, something they can funnel enough money to to prevent things from reaching a crisis level, but something that won’t make demands or change the status quo that could affect the US and Europe.  It is not without irony then that the US is effectively threatening to do away with the PA.  

Please also see The Troubadour's recent diary on this same subject:

BREAKING - U.S. Doubling Down on Foreign Policy Isolation Regarding Palestinian Statehood Bid

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site