Skip to main content

As soon as President Perry takes office with his new Congressional majorities, the first thing he will do is push for a large stimulus package.

Some attributes:

•    It will contain both big spending proposals – perhaps $2 trillion in new spending - and huge tax cuts - $2-3 trillion in the 10-year time frame, drawing from Grover's fantasy list

Note: the “Texas miracle” is clearly predicated on growth in government spending and federal spending, in particular.

From Bernstein's blog (the link above, which includes pretty charts):

47% of all government jobs added in the US between 2007 and 2010 were added in Texas.

The chart shows that Texas employment wasn’t down much at all in these years, as the state lost only 53,000 jobs.  But looming behind that number are large losses in the private sector (down 178,000) and large gains (up 125,000) in government jobs.

As crazy as he sounds at times, Perry and his advisors are not stupid.  They understand Keynesianism.  Republicans always have, despite what they pretend on TV.

•    The GOP will call the stimulus something other than a stimulus – perhaps a growth package.

•    The spending will be concentrated in proposals designed to pay off GOP and red-state constituencies, principally big oil, big coal, big agriculture, and the military-industrial-homeland security complex.

The “K Street Project”, for those who have forgotten was mainly about wholly capturing industries with large stakes in federal procurement and federal regulation to be work-horses solely for the Republican Party.  It was all about creating a baroque new spoils system.  

The Perry stimulus will be a big step toward completing the project.  

(Don’t worry – Obama will still have the bankers in his camp all through the campaign, and one of them will give him a nice job afterwards, finally scratching that itch of insecurity.)

•    The stimulus will be framed as liberating “free enterprise” – an anti-regulatory cloak will be important to cover up the naked pork.

•    The new administration and its Congressional allies will muddy the facts on the deficit-busting nature of the proposal in three ways:

1.    They will claim that the package should be evaluated on the basis of “dynamic scoring” - the same dodge used to suggest that the Bush tax cuts would “pay for themselves” – that will vastly overstate the stimulative impacts of the tax cuts and make the whole thing look less budget-busting.  (Note: Had the Bush-era dynamic scoring projections come true, the US economy today would be about 1/3 larger than it is.  It was clearly bullshit, but the con artists who pulled that off have never been held accountable – so it’s a lock that we’ll see it again.)

2.    They will claim that “tough choices” made in 2011 (the “Super Committee”) to cut Medicare and Social Security created room for these new, “urgent” initiatives

3.    They will claim that other proposed policies will offset the huge new costs – completely “privatizing” and block-granting Medicare and Medicaid will be the center-pieces that might actually go through.  Same for calls to gut NIH and EPA.  Calls to dismantle the Departments of Labor and Education will hit more resistance, but the prospective “savings” of these moves will still be added in to the numbers bandied around in public “debate.”

So here’s my question for Democrats: Are you going to support the Perry Growth Package?

After all, you want to be patriotic, and solid policy analysis suggests that we desperately need some kind of stimulus to address the suffering of millions of people.  By early 2013, we will probably be on a clear glide path into the “double-dip.”

Can President Perry count on your votes and support?


Now one last question for our Democratic Leaders: If you’re going to knuckle under and support directing $ trillions toward Republican priorities and political pay-offs in 2013 (with untold consequences for global warming, new wars, continued de-industrialization of blue states, etc.), are you sure you really want to take a meat-axe to programs that are Democratic priorities over the next 4 months?

I mean, you'll look really stupid falling for the exact same con twice in a row, and will have completely betrayed the people who elected you.  

But, then again, all that new spending will open up a lot of lobbying employment opportunities that could go a long way toward paying for that retirement you've been envisioning...


As for the rest of us, will *you* support the Perry Growth Package?

9%1 votes
63%7 votes
18%2 votes
9%1 votes
0%0 votes

| 11 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'd love to stick around... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ...but I have a squash date with Tim Geithner, David Axelrod and the confidence fairy.

    2010: An Unforced Error Odyssey

    by Minerva on Wed Aug 31, 2011 at 08:42:48 AM PDT

  •  Well my first thought was Minoxidil (0+ / 0-)

    But I think you're onto something.

  •  The TWD Judges would like to thank (0+ / 0-)

    the Diarist for this entry, but must sadly remind him that all entries must only be submitted between 12:00:00am and 11:59:59 Thursdays.

    This diary would have been a shoo in for a top award, regretfully the Judges have to disqualify this entry and impose a one week suspension of the Diarists entries into the TWD competition. You may appeal this decision by submitting the proper request to the appropriate authorities.

    Please read the Rules and abide by them.

    -6.25 -7.08 The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty. The glass is just twice as large as it needs to be. If you play Microsoft CD's backwards, you hear satanic things, but that's nothing, because if you play them forwards, they install Windows.

    by Unit Zero on Wed Aug 31, 2011 at 09:51:13 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site