Skip to main content

By Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President of the National Women's Law Center
Cross-posted from NWLC's blog, Womenstake

Yesterday was a good day for all those who care about justice, and an object lesson for the U.S. Senate. The California state Commission on Judicial Appointments unanimously voted to confirm Berkeley law professor Goodwin Liu as an Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court.

It is gratifying that an individual of soon-to-be Justice Liu's legal talent, insight, and wisdom will be on this important and influential court. Having had the great good fortune to work with him during his service on the National Women's Law Center's Board of Directors, I know him to be a person of the highest integrity and fairness, who is deeply committed to public service. The Center has benefited from his extraordinary legal mind and analytical skills more times than I can count. Although we will miss him sorely as a Board member, we are more than consoled by the fact that he will bring his exceptional talents to one of the most respected state high courts in the country, whose decisions have been looked to by other courts nationwide.

When Governor Brown nominated Goodwin Liu this July, the enthusiastic support for the nomination was immediately apparent. A month later, the California Bar Association's Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation rated him "exceptionally well qualified" and observed that "Professor Liu possesses a brilliant intellect, along with exceptional gifts for research and writing which allow him to parse complex and obscure legal doctrines and present them in the form of viable and understandable concepts." The Commission concluded that Goodwin Liu will be "an ideal addition to the Supreme Court bench because his judicious consideration of all points of view will facilitate intellectual debate and consensus building."

Yesterday, a month and a half after Governor Brown nominated Goodwin Liu, the Commission on Judicial Appointments heard the testimony of ten witnesses in support of the nomination. Letters of support flooded the offices of the Commission on Judicial Appointments, from over 130 law professors — including former Bush Administration officials John Yoo and Richard Painter — legal organizations, members of Congress, and the public.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission voted unanimously to confirm Goodwin Liu to the California Supreme Court. He will be sworn in today.

Washington, take note. California's straightforward, expeditious process only highlights how broken the system for confirming federal judges is in the U.S. Senate today. President Obama nominated Goodwin Liu to a judicial emergency seat on the federal court of appeals in early 2009. For over two years, the nomination was delayed repeatedly by simple obstinacy on the part of a determined minority, which has been bent on unprecedented obstruction of the President's judicial nominees in general, and that of soon-to-be Justice Liu in particular. His nomination was filibustered, and the Ninth Circuit seat remains vacant.

Although the federal judiciary will not directly benefit from the talents of this outstanding person, we can celebrate the fact that all of us will benefit from Justice Liu's service on the influential California Supreme Court. And, if California's confirmation process serves as an example and a wake-up call to our Senators here in Washington, we'll all have reason to celebrate again in the name of justice.

Originally posted to National Women's Law Center on Thu Sep 01, 2011 at 09:02 AM PDT.

Also republished by J Town, California politics, and APA Kos : Asian/Pacific Americans at DailyKos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site