Skip to main content

You’ve probably heard that Alabama has begun implementing the harshest anti-immigrant law in the country.  Their stated goal is to wipe every undocumented person from the state by putting such a squeeze on their communities that they are terrorized out.  Police, public utilities companies and even elementary schools are authorized to report anyone they think may be undocumented.  The chief tactic of the law is racial profiling and the goal is ethnic cleansing, plain and simple.  After all, would you use a tactic like this to find tax absconders?

One terrified woman’s description of the climate manufactured by the nativists in Alabama says it all:

I was born in the United States.  I know I have my American rights. But if I go outside people are going to think I’m illegal. I get scared because we have the color.

Insane reports are coming in from all over the state.  The law requires schools to check the immigration status of students and their parents, and authorizes them to report any who they suspect might be undocumented.  Understandably, that has led to terrified kids, mass absences, and scores of families abandoning their homes.  Though officials say that school children have nothing to fear, the Montgomery Advertiser reports that one parent described what folks on the ground are hearing all over the state in an affidavit requesting an emergency stay of the law:

A Montgomery public school teacher asked a fourth-grader whether she was a legal resident, and later asked about the immigration status of the girl's parents.

I heard the story before it was reported from an organizer down there who broke down crying while telling several of us the story.  She also told us that a civil rights abuse hotline set up right after the implementation of the law began fielded over 1,000 calls in just two days.  I can hear that teacher now: “just doing my job, just doing my part.”  Obviously the situation pisses me off but I have to admit that the organizer’s call left me pretty shaken up about where our country can so quickly go.

But according to the nativists, things are going according to plan – they like what they see.

Politico asked Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks (the guy who suggested that Congress do anything short of shooting immigrants to get them to leave) what he thought about the disappearance of Hispanic students from schools.  From the Politico piece:

So these aren’t unintended consequences.  We want illegal aliens out of the state of Alabama and I want illegal aliens out of the United States of America.

And in a post on National Review’s blog, “The Corner,” Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies, reacted to a story in the New York Times that highlighted the devastation this law is already having on one Alabama town by exclaiming “that’s the point.”

Wrote Krikorian:

The New York Times reports on an Alabama town where illegal aliens are getting the hint from the state’s new immigration law and leaving. It’s obviously presented as a terrible thing, but this is exactly the point of such measures — attrition through enforcement.

As we’ve noted in the past, “attrition through enforcement” is just another way of saying "mass-deportation."  But really, immigrants don’t live in pods that can simply be picked up and moved from Alabama to Guatemala; they have families, go to work and school, and just live their lives.

The Alabama law was written by Kris Kobach, now Secretary of State in Kansas and author of the Arizona “papers please” law.  Kobach first became famous when he, as chairman of the Kansas Republican party, got into hot water for bragging about purging minority and likely Democratic voters from the rolls.  No joke, Kobach says that he wrote the Alabama law on his laptop while sitting in a turkey blind.

The Center for American Progress does an excellent job of laying out what the law does and what the consequences are. As anyone can see, the strategy of the law is ethnic profiling. According to CAP, some of the most egregious provisions of the law are:

Schools must check the immigration status of every student and parent and report that information to the state.

Schools are authorized to report students and parents they believe to be undocumented to the federal government.

Police officers must ask anyone they stop who they think might be undocumented to prove their immigration status on the spot.

It is now a state crime to be undocumented.

Some undocumented immigrants must be indefinitely detained.

Anti-immigration activists, like Krikorian, applaud the devastation and turmoil that Latino families in Alabama are experiencing. They are driven by their anti-immigrant fervor and have no shame.  As expected, Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions seems unbothered by the human impact, too.

But, there is a human impact. And, it’s frightening that this is happening in the United States. Who would have thought we’d see headlines like "Hispanic students vanish from Alabama schools" and "After ruling, Hispanics flee from Alabama town” in the year 2011?

The Center for American Progress lifts up this quote from Silvia Giagnoni, assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Dramatic Arts at Auburn University at Montgomery:

It is sadly ironic that the same day a federal judge upholds major sections of the Alabama immigration law—the most restrictive in the nation—the state also receives an ‘A’ on its educational work in teaching civil rights history. It's ironic because this comes at a time when the most retrogressive forces in Alabama claim a victory, although it is unclear to me against whom.

And, don’t think the anti-immigrant zealots are finished. This has just whetted their appetites. They’re pushing to bring their dark vision for America to all fifty states.

So far, the leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination are proposing a vision for immigration policy eerily similar to the backwards Alabama approach: deny immigrants any chance of legal status and put the squeeze on their families to force them all out.

I’m headed to Alabama this weekend to join a team of volunteers to help as much as we can.  Please wish us luck.

Cross-posted at America's Voice and Jack & Jill Politics.

Originally posted to Adam Luna on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 08:22 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Can't agree... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ManhattanMan

    ...that addressing illegal immigration is that much of a problem, and can't agree that it rises anywhere near the level of "ethnic cleansing".

    We reach for the stars with shaking hands in bare-knuckle times.

    by TheOrchid on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 08:37:55 AM PDT

    •  Did you read what was written? (0+ / 0-)

      It says that hispanics are fleeing the state.  Not undocumented immigrants, hispanics.  That's an ethnic group that is being harassed to such an extent that they are leaving the state en masse.  That's the definition of ethnic cleansing.

      I refuse to represent my political beliefs using numbers. It isn't accurate, nor is it helpful. But I'm around a -10 on both scales.

      by AoT on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 12:57:10 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Your link to CAP (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    stonedoubt

    is incorrect, it sends to their email server.

  •  Is this really a surprise? (0+ / 0-)

    Ol 'Bama would love to vote in a constitutional amendment reinstalling segregation (or even slavery) - and it would surely pass with well more than 50% of the votes.

    "The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously." -- Hubert H. Humphrey

    by Candide08 on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 09:20:43 AM PDT

  •  This Diary misses the point. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MGross, bdevil89

    The Alabama law is a non-violent, inexpensive way to make illegal immigrants go home.  This is a good thing.

    The Diarist is correct that many anti-immigration people are racist. Even that disgusting truth does not refute the fact illegal immigration;

    - Hurts low-wage workers
    - Weakens unions
    - Puts a strain on social services.

    (There are economic benefits to illegal immigration -- but these benefits tend to flow to those rich enough to hire immigrant labor, business, and corporations. The pain is inflicted on America's working class.)

    There are many racists who believe in the Law of Gravity. There are bigots who concede that the sun rises in the east. Just because despicable people agree with me does not mean that my position is wrong.

    This is a fallacious ad hominem attack on the basic truth that illegal immigration is bad for America.

    •  good luck convincing anyone here of that (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MGross

      I've heard arguments that any and all restrictions on immigration are ultimately motivated by racism.  Everything you say could be true but there are a lot of people who just don't care, not if it means keeping someone out.

      Do you know why they call it the American Dream? Because it only happens when you're asleep.

      by Visceral on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 11:19:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  This is an attack on Hispanics (0+ / 0-)

      not undocumented immigrants.  And it's fascistic.  Why should anyone have to show papers to go to school?  By your reasoning we might as well randomly stop people on the street and search them because it would discourage people from carrying drugs.

      I refuse to represent my political beliefs using numbers. It isn't accurate, nor is it helpful. But I'm around a -10 on both scales.

      by AoT on Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 12:59:52 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  They are the illegal immigrants. (0+ / 0-)

        Demographically, Alabama has had almost no Hispanic population until a rise in illegal immigration in the last decade.

        Alabama doesn't have the settled populations of other nationalities that would attract illegal immigration from other racial groups, or the large cities and thriving economy that would make it a desirable destination for the same.

  •  It starts with sending illegal immigrants (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    deli lama

    out of state, then legal immigrants. Soon, they'll be expelling blacks from their neighborhoods, then poor whites.

    "Police, public utilities companies and even elementary schools are authorized to report anyone they think may be BLANK."

    •  the only difference between (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MGross

      the illegal immigrants and everyone else you mentioned is their legal status. Hard to see how you can lawfully do everything else you scaremongered about.

      •  Zoning ordinances that outlaw (0+ / 0-)

        certain communal living situations or types of home; removing bus stops; closing or consolidating schools; raising or lowering certain types of taxes; creating "stronger" home owners associations.

        Off the top of my head.

    •  That's quite a slippery slope you have there. (0+ / 0-)

      It's so absurd, I kind of hate to dignify it with a reply, but don't you think that, Alabama would have already given expelling blacks a shot if they could?  You know, decades ago?

      Having grown up in Alabama, I'll venture to say if they expelled blacks and poor whites from Alabama, you could fit the remaining state population in a large warehouse.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site