Skip to main content

If it isn't then I don't see why.  So maybe ya'll can take a crack at it.  Tell me why a highly progressive income tax on financial institutions is not the correct remedy for "too big to fail".  As a matter of interest, why isn't a highly progressive income tax on all corporations the best way to prevent monopolistic price gouging?  Like if your institution earns 10$ per share and the number of shares outstanding is less than 250k then the tax bite is also small.  But if the number of shares outstanding is very large then the aggregate amount of income will be severely taxed.  This would seem to keep shares divested among competing enterprises.  No one is deprived of profiting from competitive efforts and innovative performance while corporations cannot become too big to fail.  I am not going to propose the actual brackets, but brackets that taxed the current big banks at about 90% would seem to be the proper medicine.  No need to regulate them directly.  Just make it to where they will have to bust themselves up or feed the government kitty.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It would be complicated (0+ / 0-)

    If it were done simply, then Corporation lawyers and accountants would have a field day creating complex corporate structures that made it look like the profits were going to independent entities that spread it out to keep the rate low.  I'm not saying it can't be done, but it would be complex.

    Numbers are like people . . . Torture them enough and they'll tell you anything.

    by Actuary4Change on Tue Oct 11, 2011 at 08:57:52 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site