Skip to main content

Wish we had more time to devote to this latest episode of Spies Lies and those wacky Iranian guys, but quite frankly the enemy within is far more threatening. Americans have been fighting a losing battle against an invisible wealthy power base for decades.

Finally, the people have identified the source of their misery and now taking action to regain control of their government. For the administration to dilute its own momentum to mix it up with the Iranians seems counter productive.

Most nations with a capable intelligence apparatus in place engage in these type of operations all the time.  They happen everyday, everywhere, by everybody. Every now and then, somebody gets sloppy and things are seen by people who shouldn't have seen them.

Case in point:  The assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, (February 14, 1961 – January 19, 2010) took place on January 19, 2010, in a Dubai hotel room. Al-Mabhouh—a co-founder of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamist Palestinian militant group Hamas—was wanted by the Israeli government for the kidnapping and murder of two Israeli soldiers in 1989 as well as purchasing arms from Iran for use in Gaza; these have been cited as a possible motive for the assassination.

But wait there's more: His assassination attracted international attention in part due to allegations that it was ordered by the Israeli government and carried out by Mossad agents holding fake or fraudulently obtained passports from several European countries and Australia.

The photographs of 26 suspects, and the names they used, have been placed on Interpol's most-wanted list. According to Dubai's authorities, there are up to 29 suspects, 12 of whom carried British passports, six Irish, four French, one German, and four Australian, and another two Palestinians who were arrested. Interpol and the Dubai police believe the suspects stole the identities of real people, mostly Israeli dual citizens.

Then of course there is this: Alexander Litvinenko was a former officer of the Russian Federal Security Service, FSB and KGB, who escaped prosecution in Russia and received political asylum in the United Kingdom. He wrote two books, Blowing up Russia: Terror from within and Lubyanka Criminal Group, where he accused the Russian secret services of staging Russian apartment bombings and other terrorism acts to bring Vladimir Putin to power.

On 1 November 2006, Litvinenko suddenly fell ill and was hospitalized. He died three weeks later, becoming the first confirmed victim of lethal polonium-210-induced acute radiation syndrome. According to doctors, “Litvinenko’s murder represents an ominous landmark: the beginning of an era of nuclear terrorism”.

Litvinenko’s allegations about the misdeeds of the FSB and his public deathbed accusations that Russian president Vladimir Putin were behind his unusual malady resulted in worldwide media coverage.
Subsequent investigations by British authorities into the circumstances of Litvinenko’s death led to serious diplomatic difficulties between the British and Russian governments.

Unofficially, British authorities asserted that “we are 100% sure who administered the poison, where and how”, but they did not disclose their evidence in the interest of a future trial. The main suspect in the case, a former officer of the Russian Federal Protective Service (FSO), Andrei Lugovoy, remains in Russia. As a member of the Duma, he now enjoys immunity from prosecution. Before he was elected to the Duma, the British government tried to extradite him without success.

One must admit, it does make copy less boring to write, for this tale has all the elements of a Robert Ludlum thriller. The suspense, the intrigue, the subterfuge of shadowy figures lurking about Washington DC plotting to assassinate a foreign diplomat on US soil. If it were not for throwing in Los Zetas, the Mexican drug cartel as the trigger crew, the story might have appeared more plausible. Its overplaying international incidents like this that leads to war.

In our opinion, making a public spectacle of a failed plot (such as this) having little chance of success seems silly, especially if one considers the fact President Obama has authorized more hits than Al Capone.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sunbro, Joieau, JohnnyBoston
  •  Let's have no U.S. war in Iran. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    That would be very stupid.

    -4.75, -5.33 Cheney 10/05/04: "I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11."

    by sunbro on Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 08:41:29 AM PDT

  •  And the answer to "Why" is? (0+ / 0-)
    Its overplaying international incidents like this that leads to war.

    What are you inferring?  The Obama Admin announced this because, why?  Obama wants to go to war in Iran?  Obama wants Saudi and Israel to got to war in Iran?  Obama wants what?  Iran is not an increasing existential threat?

    And who are you representing/speaking for?

    In our opinion

    Just askin'

    Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

    by EdMass on Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 09:03:19 AM PDT

  •  gov't & the rich need it desperately (0+ / 0-)

    Surely nothing will get the rabble's minds off their misery than a big scary enemy and another glorious war.

    The only reason we're not at war with Iran already is that the military has already bitten off more than it can chew with Afghanistan and Iraq. Ironically, they'd be the last people to condone action against Iran right now.

    Do you know why they call it the American Dream? Because it only happens when you're asleep.

    by Visceral on Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 10:24:19 AM PDT

  •  Ok, Israelis killed some guy. It had nothing to (0+ / 0-)

    do with US. I don't see the relevance.

    No one in the administration plans the war with Iran. However, why do you suggest to ignore the fact that Iranians were trying to kill smb on US soil?

  •  Could be that what's on O's mind is finding a way (0+ / 0-)

    to deal with such a plot,  BIG sanctions to follow, rather than to encourage the "Obliterate Iran" crowd, which included Bibi but a good number of others. Better noise and sanctions than a war.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site