Skip to main content

This weekend the new Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial on the National Mall will be dedicated in Washington, D.C.

The original ceremony was intended to coincide during the 48th anniversary of the "I Have A Dream" speech,

which was itself delivered during the 100th anniversary year of the Emancipation Proclamation,

but Hurricane Irene postponed the Martin Luther King, Jr. monument dedication in August.

Yet I find it interesting and extremely congruent that the dedication will now take place in the backdrop of the Occupy Wall Street protests where Americans across the country are gathering together to cash the very same "promissory note" that Martin Luther King sought to make good upon in his call for racial and economic justice in accordance with the "unalienable rights" of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" promised to all Americans by our glorious Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

King's words in 1963 echo loudly in Zuccotti Park and across the country:

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.

Martin Luther King Jr. did not intend these statements as literal demands for money, but merely called for a level playing field of opportunity. He called upon our political and financial elites to recognize how an existing corrupt system hinders economic security, the same way that Martin Luther led a fight to get political and financial elites of the 16th century to recognize how an existing corrupt system hindered spiritual security. This fight was the Protestant Christian Reformation.

I think it's now time for a Protestant Capitalist Reformation.

For folks who are unfamiliar with the history of the Protestant Christian Reformation or need a refresher on the story around the 95 theses

the gist of Martin Luther's protest against the Roman Catholic Church of the 16th Century was this: the Church was accused of engaging in crony Christianity in the practice of the sale of indulgences whereby the rich and well-connected who sinned would be able to buy spiritual salvation and avoid sacrifice by virtue of their monetary contributions to the Church. Meanwhile, the common Christian who sinned without the money or stature to acquire indulgences had a much harder path to spiritual salvation and much harsher sacrifices imposed by the Church.

Martin Luther responded to this by founding a church based upon the notion that spiritual salvation was given freely by God to Christians.

I find this similar to the founding of this country based upon the notion that our unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness were given freely by our Creator to the American people.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Yet this notion that we Americans have natural rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is under attack by the agents of crony Capitalism, the large corporations and the corrupt politicians who enable them, united in greed and self-interest, who would turn the United States of America from a democratic republic to a kleptocratic oligarchy.

We must fight this. Whether it is through the Democratic Party founded by the author of the Declaration of Independence or through the Occupy Wall Street movement, we must fight this with everything we have.

And as we fight this, we must be ever vigilant to not let go unchallenged the slander from those who would seek to declare this movement somehow inherently anti-American or even anti-Capitalistic.

I do not protest Wall Street greed or crony corporatism or public corruption because I am an anti-Capitalist. I protest all of these things as a Protestant Capitalist American seeking to reform the existing political economic system so it lives up to the promise of this nation's founding document's promise of equal opportunity.

Stay tuned as I present what I think the 95 Theses of Protestant Capitalism should be in a future diary and feel free to add your thoughts on what those should be in comments.

But just for a preview, here are my first 10 Theses of Protestant Capitalism:

1. Corporations are not persons included among "we the people" referenced in the ordaining and establishing of the United States Constitution.

2. Corporations have not been endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, in contrast to human persons entitled to these things under the Declaration of Independence.

3. Corporations are not persons protected under the Bill of Rights or guaranteed due process from state deprivations of life, liberty or property under the 14th Amendment.

4. Corporations are state-created, state-sanctioned business organizations of capital, not independent citizens.

5. The alternative to a corporation-centric economic system is not the communist state-centric system, but instead the partnership system.

6. The partnership is the legal and economic construct for organizing capital that is most compatible with limited and responsive government, the principle of moral hazard, and social justice.

7. Corporatism and communism are not mutually exclusive, and in fact can be extremely compatible, as demonstrated in the political economy of the People's Republic of China, a country which the United States should NOT strive to emulate in its economy or otherwise as long as its citizens are deprived of basic human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

8. Abraham Lincoln was right when he said: "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."

9. This higher consideration for labor is not demonstrated in a political economy that devalues the rights of laborers to organize and imposes a system of taxation upon which capital gains are taxed at a much lower rate than labor gains (income).

10. The abolition of slavery was not just a moral issue, but an economic one, in that it for the first time established a labor interest superior to that of a capital interest and imposed a federal minimum wage.

p.s. My sincere and deep apologies if any Catholic brothers and sisters take offense at this diary or my association of the Occupy Wall Street movement with Protestantism. Although I am a Protestant (Methodist), I have a great reverence for the Catholic Church and its social justice teachings and often find myself and my beliefs reflected much more by Catholic values than I do the values espoused by some other Protestant sects. I merely use the 95 Theses example as a historical event that led to a movement protest that reformed the world as I think the Occupy Wall Street protests might as well. This explanation also goes for any non-Christians reading this diary who may taken unintended offense here. My apologies and God bless.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Please get an MLK diary in spotlight of DKos (0+ / 0-)

    whether it's mine or someone else's or one you write yourself, it's ridiculous that we can spend all this time talking about a movement against greed in occupy wall street and ignore what martin luther king did in his lifetime and his legacy of fighting against greed in the existing system.

    He was called a communist in his lifetime too, remember.

  •  Glad to see someone taking today (0+ / 0-)

    to draw out some of the connections between the Civil Rights movement and Occupations.  We ought to remember that it was the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.

    Allow me to add some of my favorite MLK quotes that I've found very relevant to today.

    Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.

    Today, what many see as a grab bag of complaints is actually a deep critique of a political culture gone wrong.  They are calling for an end to the Predator State - and for a government and economy that works for everyone.

    You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations. I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city's white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative.

    It's odd to see people who are more upset with the ways that people object to the indefensible than to the indefensible itself.  Too many of those who object to these tactics have been part of the problem.

    You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?" You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word "tension." I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation. I therefore concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue.

    We need a little less concern for bumper sticker slogans, detailed policy demands, or public opinion support, than for creating this necessary tension.

    Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

    by David Kaib on Sun Oct 16, 2011 at 08:22:13 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site