Skip to main content

Do we as teachers take the path of least resistance or do we struggle for something more?  This question I think is essential for all teachers, future and current, to wrestle with as it will really determine the effectiveness of their teaching and the meaningfulness of what lesson they are completing with their class.  Below I will lay out a brief analysis on this question, and how to go about implementing such practices in class.  Comment your suggestions, thoughts, opinions below!!  

Do we as teachers take the path of least resistance or do we struggle for something more?  This question I think is essential for all teachers, future and current, to wrestle with as it will really determine the effectiveness of their teaching and the meaningfulness of what lesson they are completing with their class.  This was also a question which I had to ask myself many times throughout my student teaching particularly when the material was somewhat unclear to me, or when attempting to teach a higher level concept or lesson to a lower level class.  This issue arises particularly when reading the pieces by Peter Seixas and William B. Stanley which both discuss they different ways in which Social Studies is and should be taught in a high school classroom.  In both of these pieces, to me, it boils down to the question which I already posed, should we as teachers take the path of least resistance or the road less traveled when educating our students.  After reading these articles, I have a greater understanding of the assumptions behind each method, and have come to the conclusion that as teachers we should expect the most out of our students, and attempt to have them reach their ultimate potential and that can only be done through challenging them to think about, synthesize, and analyze information in a truly meaningful way.

In both Schweigen! Die Kider! by Peter Seixas and Two Cheers for Postmodernism by William B. Stanley, the concept of postmodern education in history is posed up against the social narrative concept of history and the struggle to get children to think is at the heart of the dichotomy.  First, when discussing the traditional notion of social studies education there seems to speak of it in terms of what is the easiest thing to do, the type of education which requires the least struggle on the part of the teacher and the student.  While the authors seem to have differing opinions on the conceivability of postmodern education, they both see traditional education as the path of least resistance.  In Stanley’s piece, he seems to assert that postmodernism is not in itself a positive means of educating society, because as a whole most are not capable of the thinking inherent in the concept of postmodernism.  For Seixas, postmodernism is a way to challenge the students into thinking about history in a way which goes beyond the traditional constraints of history, facts included.  Their writings on this topic truly bring me back to the question posed earlier and lead me to an answer.

I think Stanley is possibly sound in his argument, but I believe he is flatly wrong. We should not teach to the lowest expectations of what society thinks of the people which inhabit it.  I believe that we should expect the highest of our students and challenge them to actively engage and think about the history in a way which becomes meaningful to them and helps make them into better citizens.  Stanley’s assertion that trying to make students into better citizens is misguided, is misguided in itself, because who is to say that students can become capable of the thinking that is required of them.  It is truly up to the teacher, and having children think about the history and politics of the past and now can help create the active, engaged minds which we strive for as teachers.  This is without a doubt a challenge and it may not be reached in one quarter, one semester, or even one year, but if we all put in the effort to attain this goal, it is certainly reachable for most of the students we encounter.    

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mostel26

    "Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it."--Robert F. Kennedy

    by chriscom on Sat Oct 29, 2011 at 11:24:23 AM PDT

  •  As a former teacher, I'd say that civics have been (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Neon Mama, kevinpdx, Mostel26

    discarded to the deteriment of our nation.

    Hope has a hole in it when Republicans come, bringing shackles and sorrow; branding their greed on the backs of the poor. - Wendy Connors

    by Wendys Wink on Sat Oct 29, 2011 at 11:49:11 AM PDT

    •  I completely agree (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Wendys Wink, Neon Mama, Mostel26

      a lot of teachers don't like to teach it, but it really should be at the heart of social studies education...also a great way to get students to see history 'alive' in the world.

      Visit us2012.blogspot.com "Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it."--Robert F. Kennedy

      by chriscom on Sat Oct 29, 2011 at 11:53:46 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I teach Civis to all 12th grade students (0+ / 0-)

      I had the luxury of being able to establish a course order for my school. We teach the following classes as required:

      9th - World History
      10th - Euro History
      11th - US History
      12th - US Gov and Politics

  •  TRUTH in the North, SCARE/FEAR in the SOUTH!! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mostel26

    When I see the american people falling into line behind the old SOUTH, I sometimes wonder who won the CIVIL WAR!! How can we possibly take these people seriously?? And yet many do. The TPARTY NATION is based on SOCIAL DARWINISM, survival of the fittest, concentration of power and wealth in the hands of the few: the plantation owners and the rest. It is abhorrent, that the american people have been so duped and gullible to believe that PERSONHOOD for an EGG is good. It allows govt to control a woman's behavior from puberty to menses and makes the millions of miscarriages each year, subject to criminal investigation. Who is going to pay for the UTERUS POLICE, ANYWAY?? The people in the SOUTH are still yearning for a past that does not exist. Look at TX. Lies in textbooks, revision of history by ideologues and they not only feel entitled to execute people, they have DEATH PANELS in their hospitals who determine whether a poor person can live!! Since when did our principles shift SOUTHWARD? BACKWARD??

    An EGG is not a person, A corporation is not a person!

    by CarmanK on Sat Oct 29, 2011 at 02:18:19 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site