Skip to main content

Because yesterday Paul Ezra Rhoades was executed in Idaho. Man oh man am I glad that happened because he was a really bad dude. (From this point on I will try to avoid being snarky, a challenge most of you know is a hard one for me.)

Seriously, Rhoades was a really reprehensible human being. I'm not going to stand on a soapbox and tell you about how he changed and found God, or that he was a troubled soul who just needed love and compassion, or any of the other things some anti-death penalty peeps will blather on about.

Indeed, I think calling him a scumbag is an insult to scumbags. I shudder to think there are people like him walking among the rest of us.

But he's dead now. And because of that we are....

What?

What has changed?

What was the purpose?

The thing is, I was going to write a similar diary before this execution in regards to Jerry Sandusky, another life form I hesitate to label "human."

Now, I'm not going to get into the politics of that issue, but, briefly, what I found disturbing is that in article after article after article about him, it was inevitable that there would be at least one comment stating that when he goes to prison, Sandusky is going to get raped by Bubba.

YeeeeeHAW!

And I know that makes a lot of people feel better. Sadly, I know that we're all so giddy over the idea that he's going to get anally raped in prison we can't fucking wait for the guilty verdict to come in.

This makes me sad.

Not for Sandusky. I have ZERO sympathy for him.

It makes me sad for the people who keep hooray-ing this idea, this wonderful revenge rape fantasy upon him.

What has happened to your souls?

Then Rhoades makes the news again because he's about to executed, something that doesn't happen very often in Idaho. (The last execution was in 1994. I don't remember it because I was an apathetic and apolitical 15 year old back then [my, how the time flies] but you can read about it here and follow the links.)

Everyone is cheering and happy about the fact that he's going to be killed.

None of these people knew his name before November, but they can't wait for him to be killed.

"He deserves it" they say.

"Yeah, he's a sick sonuvabitch," I agree. "But why are you so invested in his death?"

"Because he shot a woman eight times and left her to die, to bleed to death! How can you defend someone like that?"

"I'm not. He's guilty, he admitted guilt, he killed her, he's an asshole. But he's also been on death row, so utterly unable to affect your life that you never even knew his name until this week. So why is it so important to you that he gets killed tomorrow?"

"Because he deserves it."

And that settles everything.

Because he deserves it.

I guess I'm just tired of living in this society that keeps saying "an eye for an eye."

                                                       -----

We all know what the rest of the saying is, but we don't mention it when we talk about the death penalty, or when we talk about people who rape children.

I was asked, what if it was Amber*?

*Not her real name- that's my niece.

And I answer honestly, if someone ever hurt her, I'd kill him with my bare hands. There would be no mercy. There would be no limits to what I would do to him. I wouldn't stop to think before taking a baseball bat to his head and laughing at him while he died.

Because that is what he deserves, right?

No doubt.

But the thing is, I wouldn't be on the jury. I wouldn't be the judge. I have my own idea of what is just punishment is for anyone who hurts my niece, and it involves (as stated above) a baseball bat and a cracked skull.

So thankfully we have a system in place that stops me from going around and playing judge and jury for bad people. If we let that happen the world wouldn't be a better place, it'd just be a lot bloodier.
                                                   -----

Indeed, the idea that I could go around punishing people for their crimes is laughable, and for good reason. Child rapist? Bat upside the head. Congress critter taking money from Big Oil? Solitary confinement!!!! Unemployed man stealing bread from the bakery? Pat on the back, a 20 dollar bill to help feed your family, and the address of a food bank that can help you out.

Yes, it makes me feel really good to think of the punishment I could give criminals. And I think most of society would agree with my forms of punishment because, hey, I'm just giving each man what he DESERVES.

But when it comes down to it, I don't want to live in that kind of society.

I want the law to be better than I am.

I want justice to be more tempered than I am.

I want to live in a society that views these life forms the way I do: sad cases of human beings gone wrong. Let's lock them up and throw away the key.

Let's put the Sandusky's and the Rhoades' and the Wells' behind bars, alone, for the rest of their lives, where they can never harm another human being again.

Because if we insist on giving people "what they deserve," we're not going to get any better. We're not going to BE any better.

I want to live in a society that doesn't view justice as revenge.

I want to live in a nation that values justice over bloodlust.

You never heard of Paul Ezra Rhoades before today because he was locked up and unable to harm another human being.

Now he's dead.

So how are you better for that?

Originally posted to Le Bois de Bleu on Sat Nov 19, 2011 at 09:17 AM PST.

Also republished by Abolish the Death Penalty.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Well, hell, as usual I'm posting a really (11+ / 0-)

    poorly laid out diary because I just had to write it out.

    But I was talking to my gf about his the other day and asked her "when does it stop?"

    Yay! Sandusky is going to get raped in prison! USA! USA! USA!

    But then what do we do with the guy who raped him? Because he's a sicko rapist! RAPE HIM!!!! And what do we do with the guy that rapes him?

    I just want to live in a society that values justice over revenge.

    Tall order, I know.

    P.S. I am not a crackpot.

    by BoiseBlue on Sat Nov 19, 2011 at 09:16:53 AM PST

  •  I do take your point - and for that matter I agree (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BoiseBlue, gfv6800

    with what you're saying.

    I would just add one small thought to this...and that is that until Sandusky gets a chance to argue (through his lawyer) about the validity of the charges that have been and probably still will be filed against him, he is innocent.

    I wasn't there when whatever happened, happened.  I don't actually know what did happen.  Now, I do agree with you that if I walked in on someone doing what is alleged to a kid, I hope I would be strong enough (both morally and physically) to make sure the guy doing that never walked out the door.  But given that I wasn't the one there, and I have only heard second-hand accounts of what may or may not have happened, I am prepared to wait for the judgement of a bunch of Sandusky's neighbors about whether they believe the accusations or not.  Because I actually do (mostly) have a fairly high degree of confidence in the American jury system, at least when it isn't gamed by giving indigent defendants crappy representation on purpose.

    We shall see what the jury decides - I'm glad that I'm not them...and no, I would never be able to vote for a death penalty - that's not something I'm qualified to decide, and I would NEVER be so confident in my judgement on anything to allow an act so final.

    Wow. That was a bit longer than I had intended, but I stand by the comment.  :)

    •  I have mixed feeling about what I would've (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      PeterHug

      done had I been the one who walked in on the shower scene. My primal self says I would've done the baseball bat thing, but in reality I don't know. I may have walked away, so stunned and sickened that I didn't know how to react.

      But I do agree with you about Sandusky; he deserves to have his moment in front of the jury. I want the law to run it's course, and he is indeed innocent until proven guilty.

      He is not, however, innocent until proven guilty in the court of public opinion, and that is my point. I want to see him suffer.

      I also want to see him face a jury and have the ability to prove himself not guilty- which is different than proving himself innocent.

      Point being, I don't want a society that convicts people in the court of public opinion.

      P.S. I am not a crackpot.

      by BoiseBlue on Sat Nov 19, 2011 at 11:15:29 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I don't know what I would have done (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        BoiseBlue

        if I had walked in on something like that - particularly as a graduate assistant (which I believe is what this guy was at the time).  I would like to believe that I would have stopped it and beaten the everlasting crap out of the guy doing it - but it's really easy to sit in a chair and say that's what you would have done.  I don't know, and I must say that I'm really glad I've never been in a situation like that so far - I can only aspire to the standard I hold here.

        I agree with you completely on your major points.

  •  republished to "Abolish the Death Penalty" (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BoiseBlue, earicicle

    If any diary qualifies for republication there, it's this one.

    grok the "edku" -- edscan's "revelation", 21 January 2009

    by N in Seattle on Sat Nov 19, 2011 at 12:52:47 PM PST

  •  As I understand it, you want to give (0+ / 0-)

    Sandusky a fair trial, and then hang him; or maybe skip the trial?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site