Skip to main content

A blog post by Mark Price, originally published at Third and State.

Recent commentaries by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's editorial board and the Allegheny Institute in Pittsburgh offer a good lesson for why you should really try to read all the way to the end.

Both offer up critiques of the Keystone Research Center's recent policy brief detailing the economic impact of public-sector job cuts in Pennsylvania. Here is the Tribune-Review:

What the Keystone researchers don't say in their report, 'Public-sector Job Losses Put Brakes on Pennsylvania's Recovery,' is that to increase government hiring, the state, school districts and municipalities would have to raise taxes.

The editorial above appears to be based on commentary by the Allegheny Institute which begins:

How to speed job growth in Pennsylvania? According to the latest offering from the Keystone Research Center (KRC), the Commonwealth and local tax levying bodies should raise taxes and hire more employees.

They don't directly say 'raise taxes' but how else can the state, school districts and municipalities already facing budget deficits afford to keep all their employees-never mind hiring more?

Both of these quotes got one small thing correct: we don’t, in fact, call for school districts or municipalities to raise property or income taxes. Our main recommendation is that state policymakers spend more of the state’s revenue surplus. As we explain:

Pennsylvania’s 2011-12 General Fund budget made deep cuts to education and health care while leaving unspent $620 million from a revenue surplus last year and other unused funds. Our best estimate is that the failure to spend that revenue will by itself translate into the loss of 17,714 jobs (including private jobs lost due to the ripple effects of public job cuts) over the course of the 2011-12 fiscal year ...

In the last year, Pennsylvania lost 21,000 jobs in the public sector. Some 13,000 of those losses were education-related jobs. Among the 50 states, Pennsylvania experienced the sixth-largest decline in state and local jobs in the last year. The concentration of public-sector job losses in Pennsylvania helps explain why Pennsylvania job growth recently has stalled relative to other states.

Seems the Tribune-Review and the Allegheny Institute missed that. In their defense, we did bury those details on page 3 of the brief.

Read to the end before unleashing your criticism, you say? Who has time for that?

On a serious note, I should add that the best way to limit further local property taxes increases and public-sector layoffs is for Congress to pass a jobs bill that includes additional aid to state and local governments. 

As a special favor to the Tribune-Review and the Allegheny Institute, the CliffsNotes version of our policy recommendations:

Pennsylvania needs a jobs policy that will strengthen the private and public sectors. There is no shortage of practical ideas for how to create jobs. Options include:

  • Spending more of the state’s revenue surplus;
  • Enacting a natural gas drilling tax that supports shared statewide priorities like education as well as the environment and local communities;
  • Maximizing the potential for Marcellus Shale development to create jobs for Pennsylvania workers; and
  • Bond-financing infrastructure, school construction and energy efficiency investments at a time when borrowing and construction costs are both low.

What is missing in Harrisburg (as well as Washington, D.C.) is the political will needed to enact effective policies to create jobs. How many more months of failed austerity economics must Pennsylvanians suffer through before we get a needed change in direction?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site