In response to Britain's imposing further sanctions on Iran as punishment for Iran's continuing its nuclear program, dozens of protestors stormed the British Embassy in Tehran, and as usual with Iran there have been strong reactions and over-reactions, there is distrust on all sides, and there is plenty of just plain ignorance about the history of relations between Iran, Britain, and the United States. This is not to excuse what happened. Embassies are supposed to be safe, and the host countries are supposed to ensure that they are safe. Iran's government is awful, and a democracy movement there was violently crushed just a couple years ago. But it's also important to keep things in perspective, and to understand the wider context.
Reading the reporting from Al Jazeera, a couple pertinent facts need highlighting: The Iranian government has condemned the raid, and Iranian security forces helped free six embassy workers. From The Guardian:
Iranian police protected Britain's ambassador and some staff earlier from a large crowd outside, (British Foreign Secretary William) Hague said.
He added: "There has been a confusing situation at times as to the whereabouts of certain staff. I wouldn't use the term hostage. Clearly there have been situations where the Iranian police have intervened to try to ensure the safety of our staff.
"We are grateful for that but this situation should never have been allowed to arise in the first place."
But Hague also said there will be serious consequences. It's taken as a given that Iran's government instigated or tolerated this attack, despite Iran's government's quickly helping to end it. Hopefully, we will eventually know the truth. But we do know the truth about the history of Britain and Iran, and we do know that Iran's fledgling democracy was destroyed in 1953 at the behest of the British, and we do know that the destruction of Iran's fledgling democracy was planned and coordinated from the U.S. Embassy. Much of this we know because the key players later openly wrote about it. With good reason, Iranians are just a little wary of British and American Embassies. And again: this is not to excuse what happened, but I would like to revisit something I posted just over two years ago. It's title was a date most people in this country know nothing about. It's title was a date that haunts Iran.
August 19, 1953
It is impossible to understand modern American history, modern American foreign policy, anti-American anger throughout the Middle East and the developing nations, and the roots of anti-American terrorism, without understanding what happened on this date, in 1953. Any understanding of modern Iran has to begin with an understanding of what happened on this date, in 1953. For on August 19, 1953, the little known and not even six year old Central Intelligence Agency overthrew the democratically elected prime minister of Iran, installed a new prime minister of its own choosing, and restored to the throne a recently self-exiled Shah. It wouldn't be long before the Shah seized total local control of his government and established the brutal Savak to crush all opposition.
Mohammed Mossadegh is not widely remembered in this country, but he was Time Magazine's Man Of The Year, for 1951. The first Iranian to receive an advanced education from a European university, and a man widely renowned for his blunt honesty and impeccable integrity, Mossadegh was brilliant and disturbingly passionate, capable of verbally eviscerating opponents in political or juridical debates, and just as easily capable of breaking down crying, while giving a speech, or even passing out, while in the middle of tense negotiations. His understanding of national and international law became legendary. He often conducted official business while lying in bed.
Iran's monarchy had had a long, turbulent history, with the corrupt and incompetent Qajar regime being forced to democratize by the 1906-1911 Constitutional Revolution, but that effectively came to an end when the Qajars were toppled in the early 1920s, by a British-backed military officer named Reza Khan. In 1925, Reza Khan became Reza Shah Pahlavi, and soon turned the Iranian parliament, or Majlis, into a rubberstamp. Most people don't understand this, but the final Shah of Iran was heir to a dynasty that had lasted exactly two generations, himself included. Reza Khan's rule was secular but brutal, and he often clashed with the clergy and just as often eliminated his chief political rivals. But Iran's monarchy long had been but a compliant puppet of the British, who had controlled much of the Middle East, which had not yet become important because of oil, but was important as gateway to India, the British Empire's Crown Jewel, which the Russian Empire long had coveted. But in the early Twentieth Century, oil had become important, and the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company controlled Iran's oil production, creating a sprawling and horrifying slum to house the Iranian workers, with a parallel, segregated country club community for the British executives and managers. Iran was so taken for granted, and the British oil company's profits were so staggering, that AIOC actually paid more in taxes to its home government than to Iran for the right to steal its oil. During World War II, Reza Shah wanted to remain neutral, so the old rivals Britain and Russia, now allied against Germany, invaded and occupied. In 1941, the Shah was forced to abdicate, and was replaced by his young son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
In 1951, the Majlis was again asserting independence, and when they were to confirm the Shah's latest appointment to be figurehead prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh led the democratic nationalist opposition. In an attempt to stifle Mossadegh, a monarchist member of the Majlis sarcastically suggested that Mossadegh himself ought to stand for prime minister. Mossadegh had had a long, turbulent political career, dating back to his election to the early, still democratic Majlis, and a subsequent self-imposed exile to Switzerland, when that Majlis was neutered by Reza Shah. Few considered him desirous of leadership. But when so sarcastically challenged, Mossadegh rose and said he would be proud to serve, and the next day, the Majlis elected him. Literally overnight, the Shah's intended puppet had been replaced by a man devoted to the cause of true democracy. Mossadegh also was a secularist, a proponent of workers' and women's rights, and an avid defender of basic political and social freedoms. More ominously, for the British, Mossadegh wanted to nationalize Anglo-Iranian.
Negotiations between Mossadegh and Britain were impossible, and when Mossadegh expelled British diplomats, many of whom had been involved in covert activities, the British turned to the United States for help. President Harry S. Truman and his Secretary of State, Dean Acheson, sympathized with Iran's nationalist ambitions, and believed the best way to thwart Soviet expansionism was to side with the legitimate aspirations for freedom in less developed countries. Truman tried to mediate, but he and Acheson both were appalled by British intransigence. The British appealed to the World Court, and lost. Mossadegh was an international celebrity. But in late 1951, the British returned Winston Churchill to Downing Street, and in 1952, the Americans elected Dwight Eisenhower to the presidency. History was about to change.
Eisenhower himself was not enthusiastic about supporting Churchill's intentions with Iran, but his Secretary of State and CIA Director, the Dulles brothers, eventually convinced him otherwise. A covert operation was led by Kermit Roosevelt, grandson of late U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt, and it included creating great social unrest, which Mossadegh, being a champion of the rights to free speech and assembly, at first did little to suppress. Coupled with the economic chaos caused by a British-led international boycott against buying Iranian oil, Mossadegh's rule was weakened, and a well-bribed military then took action. A first coup attempt failed, the Shah was forced to flee to Iraq, then Rome, but before a week had expired, a second coup attempt had succeeded. The Shah was restored, Mossadegh turned himself in, and Iranian democracy was dead. So pleased were they with their results, the Dulles brothers soon began planning their second coup, which would take place in Guatemala. Anglo-Iranian subsequently changed its name to British Petroleum. Mossadegh spent three years in prison, and the rest of his life under house arrest, in a small village, where only his family and close friends were allowed to visit. The increasing repression under the Shah eventually led to his being overthrown, but it took more than two long decades, and because the Shah had so successfully crushed most secular opposition, that 1979 revolution quickly became fervently religious. Most Americans didn't understand why Iranian revolutionaries subsequently attacked the American Embassy in Tehran, taking dozens of hostages, but most Iranians knew that the demolition of their democracy, and the restoration of the Shah, in 1953, had been planned from that very building. Muslims around the world knew very well what had happened.
This is but a very brief outline, and there are many fascinating details and nuances, but undertsanding this history will be increasingly important, as the same neocons who so brilliantly propagandized for the so successful invasion of Iraq ramp up their pressure on President Obama to get more aggressive with Iran. As I've previously noted, the Obama Administration has been very wise and careful in how they have addressed the current Iranian democracy movement, because anything more overt or aggressive likely would undermine that movement, by enabling it to be depicted as more American meddling.