Skip to main content

After seeing the footage of the vandalism and attack at the Whole Foods Market Oakland on Wednesday November second during the Occupy Oakland march both from the NBC helicopter and from footage taken by protesters on the ground, I do not believe that this group of approximately 30 men in black were anarchists or had anything to do with occupy. I will present my evidence and logic and you can decide for yourself.

If you watch the NBC video, you will see a group of approximately thirty men all dressed in black, with black hoodies and black scarves over their faces, vandalize the Whole Foods in Oakland by throwing paint bombs, and by taking the tables and chairs from the outside patio and throwing them at the building and windows.  They also attack and neutralize many of the protesters who desperately try to stop them.

Here are a few facts that do not quite add up about this group of 30 men in black:

•    There are no women (at least with female presentation). The anarchist black bloc always has a few women. Where are they here? This is a big red flag.
•    These males have no normal body size variation as all anarchist groups (or any other group of normal people) do.  If you ever see the anarchist black block at a protest, there will be fat people, thin people, big people, and small people. This group is made up of entirely fit average-to-large men.
•    All of their scarves are solid black.  At all past events I have always seen anarchist with checkered and different colored scarves.
•    All of the men had new hoodies that look the same.  Anarchists are in general without much money.  Most have old and faded hoodies.  Also, the fact that they all look the same is suspicious.

As an activist, I have worked with the Anarchist Black Bloc at events over the past 12 years.  I have been present for negotiations between the Black Bloc and other ad hoc coalition members at more than one protest.  The subject was usually regarding whether or not property destruction was a sound protest tactic.  

In the past, at every protest meeting I have been to, the Black Bloc has agreed to not participate in property destruction during the peaceful large protest - so that the public does not get a mixed message.  Also, I have never seen or heard of an anarchist attacking a fellow protester, as we see happen several times on these videos.  They might attack police but not other protesters en mass.  Even if this has happened before, it seems highly unlikely that it would happen multiple times within just a few minutes.

It is true that anarchists do participate in property destruction as a tactic.  However, they generally agree to not do this at peaceful protests.  Also, it is impossible for me to believe that so many anarchists would violently attack other protestors. Maybe one or two, but this many does not seem right.  In my experience this would be totally out of character.  Also, anarchists that I have known may support property destruction as a useful tactic but are on the whole nonviolent.

Watching the NBC helicopter video of this group of men in black, they look somehow professional.  The bottom line is that anarchists are still civilians with normal variation and for the most part no military training.  This group of men looks trained.  In one video, a man in black takes a protester to the ground without hitting them but with the use of some kind of hold.  They all seem too fit, too tough.  Also, they are milling around in an unnatural way.  Like people who are not sure how to act not as a group.   In addition, the men in black seem to have a leader who directs them.  On one of the videos, when a couple of protesters - including a young man in a helmet - try to stop the men in black, the leader barks orders at the crowd.   Whoever this group of men is they seem to have overlooked the fact that one of the main tenants of anarchism is that there are no leaders!  From my personal experience the men in this group do not seem like anarchists or like any other type of protester for that matter.

This group also seems eerily familiar to the groups of thugs that appeared in Tahrir square in Cairo during the Arab spring.  They appeared, violently attacked the crowed, and then disappeared.

Add to this that the police often put plain cloths cops into the crowd to commit vandalism and start violence.  Sometimes they do this to give the police an excuse to attack the crowd.  I have personally seen plainclothes cops start violence on several occasions.  We also know that last Tuesday the police were using this same tactic.  That said, this is just an observation but this group of men in black do not seem like police.

It seems clear that this group of men are not anarchists or Occupy but some kind of paid professionals or agent provocateurs.  Who is it that would pay these men to vandalize businesses and attack protesters?  It must be some organization that is threatened by peaceful protest and that would like to see or would benefit from the situation becoming violent.  I will leave it to you to speculate on who this might be.

The mainstream media has taken this opportunity to try to make these peaceful protests look as violent as possible - by only showing violent images and rarely showing the more common scene of people that are happy or dancing and singing.  I think that it is important that the majority of the public does not perceive the Occupy movement as anything other than the peaceful group of average citizens that it is.  The majority of the General Strike in Oakland was completely peaceful.  And the few incidents were caused by groups not affiliated with the Occupy movement or the General Strike.

For the record, the morning after these incidents, Occupy movement volunteers cleaned the paint off of all the businesses and paid the business for the damage out of their meager resources (after all, many people participating in Occupy are unemployed).

After publishing a first draft of this article and getting feedback from Occupy members and communicating with many people on and off line it has become clear that many people involved with Occupy understand that people dressed in all black at protests who destroy property are police or agents of some kind.  The most common belief seems to be that they are the police.   However, there is a smaller group that believes these men in black to be some kind of mercenaries.  The most common tactic of government agents is to find a small fringe group then infiltrate it with so many agents that the agents become the majority of the group and then vote for violent actions that can then be used to discredit what the organization stands for.

There is also a strong precedent for our government infiltration peaceful groups to make them appear to be violent.  The most public example of this domestically is the environmental organization Earth First!  To this day Earth First! has a false reputation for violence that was solely due to FBI infiltration and manipulation.  Famously the FBI led by FBI agent provocateur Michael Fain planted a bomb in the car of Judi Bari in an attempt to both assassinate her and discredit the organization as terrorists.  This information became public record after a civil suit was filed by Earth First! years later.  The FBI also infiltrated Earth First in 1989 and did whatever they could to push a radical agenda which eventually resulted in 4 members being charged and jailed for conspiracy to cut down a power line.  Three of the five people in this so-called “terrorist operation” where FBI agents.  The CIA has used similar overwhelming infiltration tactics with groups like The Mujahideen and The Taliban.  It is possible that this may be what we have here--agents infiltrating a group to such a degree that they outnumber the non-agent members of the group and thus the group now becomes, in effect, part of whichever government organization infiltrated it.

The important point to take away from all this is that people in groups dressed in black that act violently and destroy property at protests are paid by our government to make peaceful protests look violent.  This is pretty clearly part of the propaganda mechanism.  Occupy as an organization and a movement is not violent and does not destroy property.  Occupy is peaceful.

Another important thing to keep in mind is that the Occupy movement is not something that was designed, but is a natural outgrowth of our times.  Occupy is not some other.  Occupy is you and me. It is all of us.  If you want to vote at the General Assembly, just go down to your local occupy and cast your vote.  All are welcome. You can also vote online if it is difficult for you to be there in person.  We are all free and, in fact, strongly encouraged to participate in this our movement.  Occupy is all of us.  We are the 99%.

Whole foods:

Whole foods:

Real Occupy at docs:

Earth First! Judi Bari FBI attempted assassination:

Earth First! Foreman:

US funding of Taliban:

US Funding of Mujahideen:

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Whole foods? May be anti-libertarianism (0+ / 0-)

    The owner of Whole Foods is a libertarian tool. Black block does specifically train for this sort of thing, so they should look professional. Not saying there aren't agents involved. Just saying, black block train for this and like most progressives in the know, they HATE the libertarian Whole Foods. Whole Foods is a Koch sucking, labor busting, environment raping corporate sociopath.

    Look, if the ruling class can play "good cop/bad cop" with our two party system, we can play "good cop/bad cop" too. Go ahead and condemn the actions of Mr. Bad Cop, the good cop always does. He just can't do anything about it because Mr. Bad Cop is CRAZY. He might do ANYTHING, so you don't want to get him mad.

  •  "the important point to take away..." (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    qannabbos, Sandino, CJB, Neuroptimalian
    The important point to take away from all this is that people in groups dressed in black that act violently and destroy property at protests are paid by our government to make peaceful protests look violent.

    Well, I think we can say that's one possibility, but nothing of the sort has been proven in this case.  

    Why isn't there a plan agreed on ahead of time to deal with these clowns?  Photograph them.  Follow them until they take off their silly costumes and get shots of their faces.  Distributed the photographs widely and get their names.  Make it impossible for them to ever again infiltrate a peaceful demonstration.  

    If you want to prove your case, you've got to identify these guys.  It's not impossible to do.

    •  good idea (0+ / 0-)

      We need to do this.  This is also an argument in favor of my point.  Sure we do not have the resources to find these guys easily but the FBI does.  Why haven't they found any of these people.  One answer could be because they do not want to.  Food for thought.

      •  A little more food for thought... (0+ / 0-)
        Why haven't they found any of these people.  One answer could be because they do not want to.

        Is it also possible that we haven't identified and isolated these people because too many of us are sympathetic to them, and we do not want to either?  You don't have to read many OWS diaries on this site to find support for black bloc tactics, including explicit support for property destruction.  

        I think we have to accept the fact that: A.) some disruptive individuals are acting on behalf of OWS opponents, and, B.) some disruptive individuals are people who just like breaking stuff and creating chaos.  Both A and B can be true in this case.  

  •  That's pretty mild. (0+ / 0-)

    If you're going to go  to the trouble and risk of hiring paid agents to pose a protesters, you'd think you'd want them to do something controversial and unpopular enough to turn public opinion.  

    This barely even made the local news.

    •  Not sure this is the case (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      If you talk to most people on the street they will say that they agree with what Occupy is upset about but that they do not agree with the methods especially the violence and destruction.  This action and others like it have had the intended effect.  People believe that Occupy is starting riots and breaking things when they are not.

  •  You're thisclose to a CT diary (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rscopes, Bill W, Neuroptimalian
    This group also seems eerily familiar to the groups of thugs that appeared in Tahrir square in Cairo during the Arab spring.  They appeared, violently attacked the crowed, and then disappeared.

    Add to this the fact that we know for a fact that at every major protest, the police put plain cloths cops into the crowd to commit vandalism and start violence.

    What you call a fact, I think most of us would call speculation.

    Battleground Wisconsin: Fascism has come to America

    by jhecht on Wed Dec 14, 2011 at 11:51:19 AM PST

    •  Maybe not common knowledge (0+ / 0-)

      This is not common knowledge but in the the dozens of protest I have attended this was always the case.  I am willing to concede that these may have been some protest somewhere where this was not the case.  That is why I qualified this with the word "Major".  But you are correct we do not have absolute proof they have done this every time.  But it simply is not reasonable to believe that they would be engaged int he practice and then skip some of the actions.  Not unless there were some overriding reason to do so.  I will qualify the statement further.  Thank you for your feedback.

  •  I appreciate your observations and willingness (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    to ask these questions.

    I also appreciate you're being careful to not make assertions (CT) for which there is no evidence, and for pointing out such information that might be had. Rarely is this kind of thing admitted or known about, but is almost always based on bits and pieces, cause, guess what, if They did this, They wouldn't want it known, like criminals everywhere.

    And as you point out there is a history of this, you didn't mention the Cointelpro actions of the FBI.

    I'm pretty familiar with that.

    An FBI agent wrote in his memoirs later that the burning of the Bank of America Isla Vista Bank was a Cointelpro organized effort.

    Good luck with the coming accusations, threats, and lectures about CT and making dkos look bad for asking us to look at this issue, and thanks.

    ..squinting all the while in the glare of a culture that radiates ultraviolet consumerism and infrared celebrity...Russell Brand

    by KenBee on Wed Dec 14, 2011 at 12:05:16 PM PST

  •  I agree with you Gvico (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

     I've been to several free trade protests, seen the black bloc in action and I've never seen any of them that looked like this. Look at their hoodies. Brand new matching hoodies? No a rip, not a bit of dirt, paint on them?
       And where the heck are the cops? Christ, at every OWS protest I've been to, you can't take a step without bumping into a cop, but here protesters are actually destroying property and there are no cops to be found? Wierd.

    If the casualties of principle are not healed, the physical casualties will continue to mount.----Martin Luther King

    by goobop on Wed Dec 14, 2011 at 01:50:45 PM PST

  •  sorry, can't control the grammarian -- it's (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    agents provocateur

    the second word is the adjective; the first word is the noun it's modifying, where the plural goes.

    maybe if the two words had been hyphenated together????

    sorry, it just hit my poor old brain with a 2x4

    "real" work : a job where you wash your hands BEFORE you use the bathroom...

    by chimene on Wed Dec 14, 2011 at 02:19:18 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site