Skip to main content

Some of the guys at reddit have started collecting lists of corporate sponsors of SOPA.

Here's one list from a Google group;

& a longer one is at the end of this PDF. (Feel free to skip the pro-censorship propaganda at the top — though it shows what lies the signers are standing behind.)

Spread the word. No more money for those who want to enslave us.

(More past the Kos Wingding)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE: In the comments, please disregard my links to opencongress.org. Some of the information about who supports what is incomplete & may be inaccurate, as it contradicts what some other sources have said.

To make things easier, here's the partial list (source):

1-800 Contacts, Inc.
1-800-PetMeds - 954-979-5995
3M - 1-888-364-3577
ABRO Industries, Inc. (automotive supplies) - (574) 232-8289
Acushnet Company (Titleist and Footjoy golf) - (800)225-8500
adidas America - (800) 448-1796
Bose Coporation - (508) 879-7330
Burberry - 800 284 8480
CBS Corporation - 1-212-975-4321
Chanel USA - 1.800.550.0005
Coach - 1-800-444-3611
Columbia Sportswear Company - (800) 622-6953
Dolce & Gabbana USA, Inc.
Electronic Arts, Inc. - (650) 628-1500 (they open at 8am PT)
Fender Musical Instrument Company - 480.596.9690
Ford Motor Company - 800-392-3673
Gibson Guitar Corp. - 1-800-444-2766
Harley-Davidson Motor Company - 1-800-258-2464
Johnson & Johnson - (732) 524-0400
Juicy Couture, Inc - 1-888-908-1160
kate spade - 866-999-5283
Lacoste USA - 1-800-452-2678
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. - (800) 847-8665
Lexmark International, Inc. - 1-859-232-2000
Liz Claiborne, Inc - (212) 354-4900
L'Oréal USA - 1-212-818-1500
Lucky Brand Jeans - 1-866-975-5825
Major League Baseball - 212-485-3444
Marmot - (707) 544-4590
Monster Cable Products, Inc. - 415 840-2000
National Basketball Association (NBA)
National Football League (NFL)
NBCUniversal - 212-664-4444
Nervous Tattoo Inc., dba Ed Hardy - 323-785-4460
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. - (636) 326-1024
New Era Cap Co Inc - 1-877-632-5950
NHL Enterprises, L.P. - 212-789-2000
Nike, Inc. - 1-503-671-6453
Nintendo of America Inc. - 425.882.2040
Oakley, Inc. - (800) 431-1439
Peavey Electronics Corporation - 601-483-5365
Perry Ellis International - 1-800-994-0073
Petzl America - 801-926-1310
Pfizer Inc. - 1-212-733-2323
PGA of America - (561) 624-8400
Philip Morris International - 804-274-2000 or 800-343-0975
PING - 1.800.474.6434
Ralph Lauren Corporation - 888-475-7674
Red Wing Shoe Company - 1-800-733-9464
Reebok International Ltd. - 781-401-5000
Revlon - 1-800-473-8566
Rite Aid - Home Office: (717) 761-2633
Rolex Watch USA Inc. - 665 5th Ave, New York, NY10022 - Tel: (212) 758-7700 - Fax: (212) 223-7443
Rosetta Stone Inc. - 1.800.280.8172?
Shure Incorporated - (847) 600-2000
Sony Electronics Inc. (try 1-800-222-7669)
Sony Music Entertainment - (212) 833-8000
Sony Pictures Entertainment - 310-244-4000
Spyder Active Sports, Inc - 303-544-4000
Taylor Guitars - 619-258-1207
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. - 1.866.530.8624
The Dow Chemical Company - 800-258-2436
The Estee Lauder Companies - 877-311-3883
The Timberland Company - 603-772-9500
The Walt Disney Company - 818-560-1000
Tiffany & Co. - 1-800-843-3269
Time Warner Inc. - 212.484.8000
Toshiba America Business Solutions, Inc. - Corporate Offices (949) 583-3000
Ultimate Fighting Championship - (702) 221-4780
Viacom - (212) 258-6000
Wal-Mart - 479-273-4000
Warner Music Group - (212) 275-2000
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. 203-352-8600 (see bottom for corporate)
Xerox Corporation - 1-800-275-9376
Zippo Manufacturing Company - 888.442.1932
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  head scratch (10+ / 0-)

    I expected to see media, music, film, book companies. Why are car and cigarette cos doing it.. because they own other companies?

    A man, a plan, a canal, Panama

    by Karl Rover on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 10:37:48 AM PST

    •  Taylor Guitars? (9+ / 0-)

      Fender Guitars?

      Really?

      "Ronald Reagan is DEAD! His policies live on but we're doing something about THAT!"

      by leftykook on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 10:41:31 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yeah. (6+ / 0-)

        Apparently they want to make sure that people who buy their instruments have nowhere to show their actual music.

        As for Gibson, this is one more dark mark on their ledger after that recent rainforest-wood smuggling scandal...

        Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

        by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 10:57:12 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Well, I know for a fact that the AFofL (0+ / 0-)

          along with a many of the other entertainment
          industry trade unions- including the AFofM- have
          testified in behalf of this bills passage.

          I seem to recall that the house and senate bills
          have some major differences, but both address
          much needed inequities in foreign piracy laws
          and their related implementations and enforcement.

          I wonder why those who seek to utilize others works
          for massive profit are so concerned about it? Might it
          be likened to other industries externalizing their costs
          to all others, while privatizing their profits, like say, the
          fossil fuel and carbon based energy companies?

          Who should one believe? Embattled industrial age
          trade unionists in the 'pockets' of their respective
          employers, or global information and advertisement
          purveyors who wish to use and profit from the afore
          mentioned groups labors and products to make their
          own profit even as they resell everyone's interests?

          I think, eventually, that both of these interests may
          be able to negotiate some sort of equitable settlement
          and its related necessary enabling legislation that will
          in no doubt please neither faction in its entirety.
           

          •  If you mean an alternative bill (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Larsstephens, blueoasis
            I think, eventually, that both of these interests may
            be able to negotiate some sort of equitable settlement
            and its related necessary enabling legislation

            ...Reps Lofgren & Issa have certainly worked on one. It's called the OPEN Act — & it still has yet to get a proper introduction to the House & the public.

            Hopefully this will change after the winter break.

            Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

            by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 04:47:55 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

      •  Gibson Guitars purchased OpCode software (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Brown Thrasher, Jaimas, blueoasis

        in the 1990s, and have probably broadened their software-related acquisitions since then.  

        Of course, the fact that the proposed legislation would not only not address that concern, but make it more difficult for Gibson to market software, probably hasn't entered Gibson's calculus.  

        Shirley Chisholm was right. Our Republic is in deep trouble.

        by Big River Bandido on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 11:42:42 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Taylor is (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        blueoasis

        the only one on the list I wasn't already avoiding.

        Too bad about them, though.

        I am not religious, and did NOT say I enjoyed sects.

        by trumpeter on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 03:53:08 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  or because they sell branded goods. (6+ / 0-)

      They would support the laws as they would use them to enforce their brands.

      "The only person sure of himself is the man who wishes to leave things as they are, and he dreams of an impossibility" -George M. Wrong.

      by statsone on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 11:01:05 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I don't even understand why 99% of those (14+ / 0-)

    companies are on that list of supporters. Why the hell would 1-800-PetMeds or Ford even care? It's not like you can illegally download their products off the internet.

    TEABAGGER: Totally Enraged About Blacks And Gays Getting Equal Rights

    by yg17 on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 10:37:52 AM PST

  •  A List Of Corporations Not Supporting SOPA Would (5+ / 0-)

    be shorter.

    A Good Peasant Is A Silent Peasant - Jesse LaGreca

    by kerplunk on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 10:43:07 AM PST

  •  Is this for real? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior

    I read the links but the original letter is something I could have done with any text editor and a list of companies I spent a few minutes just listing off the top of my head.  It seems a really amateurish thing, both the original letter and the response designed to boycott a lot of companies.

    Perhaps the PDF is just a transcription of the letter, but I can't imagine these companies all coming together on one document without letterhead or other means for showing it was under some unifying body (like the Chamber of Commerce, for example).

  •  most of those vendors (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Brown Thrasher

    are a little too rich for my purchasing abilities.

    one of them i work for.

    hope springs eternal and DAMN is she getting tired!

    by alguien on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 11:11:14 AM PST

  •  SOPA supporters giving more than opponents (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Brown Thrasher

    SOPA supporters are cashing the media's checks

    The media industry, which wants to see the controversial Stop Online Privacy Act (SOPA) passed, has showered cash upon sponsors of the bill, far surpassing the amounts given by the Internet and tech companies that oppose the measure.
    Proponents of the bill, which critics say would stifle expression and innovation, skirt due process and possibly create massive technical problems for the Internet, have given more than $1.9 million to SOPA's sponsors since the beginning of the 2010 election season, according to Maplight, a non-profit organization that "reveals money's influence on politics." Tech and Internet firms have given just $525,000 during that time.
    •  The price tag on Congress... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nchristine, My Spin

      Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

      by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 11:48:07 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  & as long as we're thinking about it... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        nchristine, My Spin

        Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

        by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 11:51:45 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  From Article: We don't know how to fight (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Brown Thrasher, trumpeter

          The article says that we don't know how to fight.  We are not giving money to the lawmakers.  But seems like our online activities has slowed it down.

          The stark difference highlights not only Silicon Valley's relative lack of pull in Washington, but also the vast difference in approaches taken by tech and media when it comes to influencing legislation. Big Media, which has been embedded in national politics since before the silent-film era, relies on old-fashioned high-powered lobbying and money. Silicon Valley often emphasizes grassroots, Internet-based campaigning on behalf of its causes. Hence the loud and ubiquitous online outcry over SOPA, which so far has done little to slow the bill's progress through the House, though it has led to some amendments designed to appease critics, which include firms such as Google, Yahoo and Facebook.
          We will just have to keep flooding our Sens/Reps with emails and phone calls.

      •  COMMENT UPDATE! Please read! (0+ / 0-)

        I initially posted this opencongress.org link to illustrate monetary contributions to those Representatives that are for or against this legislation.

        However, I have since looked at the page in more detail & found that enough information is either lacking (Darrel Issa's opposition isn't listed at all, & neither is Wassermann-Schulz's support) or contradicting what other sources have said (Nancy Pelosi, who has openly opposed it, is listed as supporting) that I cannot confirm the accuracy of the information on this page.

        Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

        by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 03:55:58 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Some are easy targets, others are gonna be a (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Brown Thrasher

    challenge.

    ASCAP? I guess that means no listening to any recorded music. Or even going to most performances of live music.

    Dolby Labs? Kind of rules out most playback equipment manufactured in the past forty years. Or going to a movie theatre or a concert.

    Believe me I'm as angered by SOPA and its Senate companion piece as anyone here; I'm not sure I have the stomach to actually remove myself from the culture to the extent a full and honest boycott of all the listed sponsors would require. It seems to me that there must be better ways of applying pressure back.

    •  There are other ways to make them know (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Brown Thrasher

      I have suggested over at Wikipedia, as part of our ongoing discussions of a blackout, that we should compile a list of the IP addresses known to be associated with any entity on this list and specifically target our blackout at them, not the whole country, as long as the bill's pending, in addition to Congress.

      And, my idea goes, we could and should get Facebook and Twitter to do this too. Think about the effect ... do you think anyone in Congress wants to be going into an election year cut off from all three of those websites while their non-incumbent opponents aren't in primaries and general elections aren't? We can exempt, of course, OPEN Act supporters like Sen. Wyden and (yes) Rep. Issa and companies like Kaspersky Lab, which pulled out of the Business Software Alliance over that organization's (predictable) support for SOPA.

      I am thinking of devoting a diary to this ...

    •  Several of those are indeed low blows (0+ / 0-)

      ...though some of us live in areas which are short on music/theater venues anyway, so that refusing to donate to Big Media's legal fund has the added benefit of saving on gas money.

      As for discs & equipment you already have — I'll leave it to others to decide whether they want to publically get rid of movies, music, or hardware to make a statement, but for the most part I'd think that not buying more would suffice for most people.

      That, & supporting independent artists & publishers. Seriously, one of us Kossacks ought to start a bibliography of indy artists. (So it doesn't have to be about "removing yourself", but rather trading up.)

      Tell Congress: DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET!

      by Brown Thrasher on Wed Dec 21, 2011 at 12:56:53 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  One set of companies I really don't get, however (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Brown Thrasher, trumpeter

    Fashion companies like Kate Spade and Izod. They've complained about piracy and counterfeiting, somewhat understandably; however so far their efforts to get the aspects of their products that aren't useful and necessary to them copyrighted, even for just two years, have failed (although the EU has allowed such protection, it has been minimally taken advantage of so far ... the feeling in the industry is that only if it were instituted in the U.S. would it be effective. Here's a counterargument). So, they have no U.S. copyrights to infringe.

    They do have trademarks to protect (in lieu of copyright, they've been splattering them all over their products, the reason you see Coach bags with all those giant "C"'s) but I don't think SOPA would really help much there.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site