Skip to main content

Among the confused delusions vomited forth by Tea Party members was their comic slander of President Obama as both a fascist and a socialist.  Now, those casual comparisons of Obama to Marx and Hitler are becoming commonplace among the Republican demagogues who would replace him in the White House.  Over just the past few days, Ricks Santorum and Perry likened the President to Mussolini and Hitler even as Mitt Romney and Michele Bachmann placed Obama in the European socialist camp.  So, voters can be forgiven for asking, which bogus totalitarian threat should we fear most?

For the down but not yet out Rick Perry, the answer is all of the above.  This week, the Texas governor suggested his Kenyan was more like the Fuhrer in 1944:

"This election is about stopping a president of the United States and his administration that is abusing the Constitution of this country, that is putting America on a track to bankruptcy," Perry told a hotel ballroom packed with more than 200 volunteers.

"It is a powerful moment in Americans' history, and you are on the front lines," he added. "This is Concord. This is Omaha Beach. This is going up the hill realizing that the battle is worth winning."

Of course, for months Perry (and his wife) insisted in interviews and ads that Barack Obama is "absolutely" a socialist.

Newt Gingrich, too, chose both Hitler and Stalin as analogs for President Obama.  When he wasn't declaring the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress are a "secular-socialist machine" that "represents as great a threat to America as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union," Gingrich worried that Obama's "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior" is "outside our comprehension."

If Rick Perry thinks Barack Obama may be Der Fuhrer, Iowa caucus co-champion Rick Santorum fears the President is Il Duce:
[My grandfather] came after having fought in World War I because Mussolini has been in power now for three years and had has figured out that Fascism was something that would crush his spirit and his freedom....And we have two parties that are out talking about how they're going to solve those problems. One wants to talk about raising taxes on people who have been successful and redistributing money, increasing dependency in this country, promoting more Medicaid and food stamps and all sorts of social welfare programs and passing Obamacare to provide even more government subsidies. More and more dependency, more and more government -- exactly what my grandfather left in 1925.

Then again, in April Santorum claimed President Obama had failed to fight against "militant" and "godless socialism."  And just last month, Santorum expanded on his frothy communist mixture, baselessly declaring:

"President Obama is for income equality. That's socialism. It's worse yet, it's Marxism."

And that comes, Santorum fumes, from a President who consistently "sided with our enemies."

Santorum will get no argument from his recently departed GOP rival,Michele Bachmann.  In 2008, Bachmann, famously warned about then Senator Obama, "I'm very concerned that he may have anti-American views."  Ever since he took the oath of office, Bachmann as she did again today painted President Obama red:

"What the Congress had done and what President Obama had done in passing Obamacare endangered the very survival of the United States of America.  I will continue fighting to defeat the president's agenda of socialism."

Surprisingly, Bachmann's words differ little from those of the Republicans' almost certain nominee, Mitt Romney.  In Iowa Tuesday night, Romney kept up his pathetic slander that President Obama "believes in an entitlement society" in which "government should create equal outcomes."   Repackaging his 2007 strategy to run against Hillary Clinton, Romney declared:

"I think he believes America should become a European-style welfare state."

Just the day before, Romney echoed Bachmann's warning about the dire, existential threat the un-American 44th President supposedly poses to his nation:

"[He] sees the European welfare state as perhaps being the more appropriate model. An entitlement society, where the role of government is increasingly to take from someone to give to others. That would deaden the American spirit. That would substitute envy for ambition. It would poison the very spirit of America that allows us to be one nation under God."

Of course, in that nation under God, that Republican fascist/socialist/Marxist/Nazi Barack Obama delivered the largest two year tax cut in modern American history even as the Dow Jones grew by a third during his time in office.  Under his deficit-cutting health care program, most Americans will pay for private insurance to cover care from private doctors and private hospitals.  While the 600,000 layoffs by state and local governments dwarfed any gains in federal hiring, the sluggish U.S. economy has produced 21 straight months of private sector job growth.  Thanks to President Obama, the U.S. auto industry not only saved a million jobs for Americans, but now enjoys growing sales and large profits for shareholders.  It's no wonder Mark Zandi, the economic adviser to the same John McCain who will endorse Mitt Romney today, concluded that the Obama administration averted "Great Depression 2.0."

And that, unfortunately for the myth-makers and demagogues now seeking the Republican nomination for President, will sound a lot like capitalism to the American people.

** Crossposted at Perrspectives *

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Atheist/Muslim/Commie (2+ / 0-)

    They just hurl pieces of shit like so much Santorum.

    It's laughable, man

  •  The GOP is the new John Birch Society nt (3+ / 0-)


  •  What isolates reject is mutualism. (2+ / 0-)

    The idea that people are connected to and obligated to each other scares them half to death.  Because they haven't a clue what other people might need or want from them.  Indeed, although they are self-centered, they do not know where their own interest lies.  It's this insecurity which leads them to pretend that they want nothing and nobody else should want anything either.  It's called making virtue out of vice.

    Our mistake is in accepting their verbiage and trying to parse it.  That's a useless endeavor when people do not know what they are talking about.

    People to Wall Street: "LET OUR MONEY GO"

    by hannah on Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 01:05:03 PM PST

  •  It's really very simple (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    AggieDemocrat, notdarkyet

    Socialists/Commies/Nazis/Fascists/Muslims/atheists/insert your favorite badguy here are Bad People. Therefore, Obama is all of them.

    "I belong to no organized party. I am a Democrat."--Will Rogers

    by vgranucci on Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 01:07:14 PM PST

  •  This may be what you're looking for: (4+ / 0-)

    Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary? . . . and respect the dignity of every human being.

    by Wee Mama on Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 01:12:59 PM PST

  •  This diary reminds me of something that happened (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    to me a couple years back on HuffPo. Some deluded rightwinger had been convinced by Glenn Beck or whoever that fascism, socialism, communism and totalitarianism were all left wing political ideas. We spent two weeks going back and forth as I begged, BEGGED him to simply look these terms up on Wikipedia or consult any grade school level political science text. He simply could not be convinced that fascism and socialism are actually on opposite sides of the political spectrum. He also believed that the Nazis were socialists simply because their party was the 'National Socialists' party, a spurious argument that Beck has been making for years. It's sad how much brainwashing and willful ignorance is out there.

    But yeah, the majority of conservatives likely couldn't define communism, socialism or fascism even if you gave them a dictionary. They're just meaningless smear words that they like to hurl.

    •  The economic system in Nazi Germany (0+ / 0-)

      and certainly Fascist Italy was largely socialist, although it was distinct from the international socialism championed by Marx.  Where Republicans and Democrats both, frankly, go wrong, is in thinking that it was economics that distinguish fascism.  It's not.  Virtually all European and North American states extended social safety nets and took part in directing their national economies.  If anything, the Nazis adopted Keynesian measures more enthusiastically then even FDR.  

      Still, that doesn't make the Nazis "left wing".  What distinguished fascism was extreme nationalism, and that's why they are considered to have been a right-wing movement.  Hence, "national socialism", which replaced Marx's notion of class identity with national identity, and advocated ethnic, rather than class solidarity.

      In any case, that HuffPo poster was wrong about fascism being "left-wing", but that idea predates Beck by a long time.  Freidrich Hayek, and many of the other German free-market economists persecuted by the Nazis argued that fascism was the natural outcome of state intervention in the economy.  They were, imo, wrong, but that doesn't mean that the fascists didn't nationalize industries, direct industrial production, or enact social programs.  

      To believe that markets determine value is to believe that milk comes from plastic bottles. Bromley (1985)

      by sneakers563 on Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 02:01:40 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I have been hearing this for over 6 years (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Before Obama's Presidency often charges laid on me as a liberal. Actually the real charge is totalitarian, which is psychological projection, but because of the ignorance and inability to critically think or know what actually the definition is, these politicians sling insults for their dumb audiences.

    To them totalitarianism is when they lose politically and policies move forward and effects them, they then want to secede, they do not want to participate in a Republic or democracy...  

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty~Ben Franklin

    by RWN on Wed Jan 04, 2012 at 02:43:02 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site