Skip to main content

The latest pile of hypocrisy from the government, the opposition and the media concerns a tweet from Diane Abbott (http://en.wikipedia.org/...) the Labour MP from Hackney North and Stoke Newington and the first black woman elected to the House of Commons.  In this tweet, she responded to a statement from freelance journalist Bim Adewunmi  in a discussion of the conviction of two of the murderers of Stephen Lawrence. For those that have not heard of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, this was an unprovoked racist murder of a young black man at a bus stop in Eltham, South London in 1993.  Due to police corruption, racism, and incompetence, it has taken 18 years until two of the killers have finally been sentenced to a minimum of 29 years for murder earlier this week; Stephen’s family led the fight for justice and this case caused a serious overhaul of both police procedures and the justice system following an investigation finding institutional racism in the police and police procedures (http://www.dailykos.com/...). It has not eliminated racism in policing by any means, this is evident from the fact that stop and search procedures still target people of colour primarily and people of colour are disproportionately present in the UK prison system.

In this twitter discussion, Ms Adewunmi wrote that “so-called ‘black leaders’ were out of touch with the people they claimed to represent” (here is Ms Adewunmi’s view on the discussion with Ms Abbott:http://www.guardian.co.uk/...).   Ms Abbott responded by saying “White people love playing divide and rule. We should not play their game (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/...).”

This tweet has resulted in a hullaballoo in which Ms Abbot has been accused of racism and “inciting hatred against white people” by one of the few non-white Tory members of parliament Nadhim Zahawi (http://www.zahawi.com/) who called for her sacking as Shadow leader for Public Health and for her to leave her seat (shame on him, really I would be laughing if it was not so grotesque).  Mr Zahawi said: "This is racism. If this was a white Member of Parliament saying all black people want to do bad things to us they would have resigned within the hour or been sacked."  Nick Clegg, Liberal Democrat Deputy Prime Minister, said her comments were “stupid and crass.”  From the right-wing press, as expected, Abbott has been attacked and even called a racist for stating the obvious (see, for a particularly racist piece, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...).  Labour party leader, Ed Milliband, has forced her to apologise for her statement.

Is this a case of someone being forced to apologise for saying the truth?  I think so and quite honestly I wish that she had stood by her statement.  In fact, I would say even more, this is blatant cowardice on the part of the Labour party and its leader and incredible hypocrisy by the government which has used divide and rule as an essential tactic both in their campaigns and in their governance.

If I have a point of criticism against Abbott’s original statement it is that I strongly think that debate and discussion are essential, we have different approaches and beliefs to fighting for political, social and economic justice. Moreover, questioning and challenging leadership are an essentially healthy thing.  It prevents leadership from becoming unaccountable and it enables the rise of new tactics and strategies to deal with injustice; it is essential if democracy is to mean anything more than going to the ballot box to vote.

However, what would you call it when the government tries to play off workers in the private sector from workers in the public sector arguing the latter are privileged because they have better pensions (as pension benefits have been eroded in the private sector)?  Yes, divide and rule.  How about when they decry those on disability as lazy, or those on benefits as slackers and living off the hard work of others rather than carrying their own weight (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/...)?  Yes, that is divide and rule.  How about describing those that participated in last summer’s riots and the poor (due to their laziness, their dissolute behaviour, their wanting things beyond their means, blah, blah, blah) as immoral (http://www.guardian.co.uk/...)?  How about all the racist comments coming out of the mouths of Tories as large numbers of the poor that participated in these riots were black (here is a nauseating example: http://www.bbc.co.uk/...?  Yes, again.  Blame the victim has very helpful when divide and rule tactics are used by various governments.  How about the argument that male unemployment is due to feminism and women in the workplace as though given the attack on incomes of the working and middle class, a single income could sustain a family in these days (http://www.guardian.co.uk/...)?  Yes, again!  So, for this government which routinely uses divide and rule tactics to call for Abbott’s removal and resignation we are looking at a denial of reality and something so offensive that it reaches new heights for unmitigated gall and hypocrisy. Imagined that you are being condemned for stating the obvious, because this is what it looks to me.  

In her apology, Diane Abbott said that her comment was taken out of context and said that she was referring to the nature of 19th century European colonialism. But can we say honestly that divide and rule (aka divide and conquer in the US) does not exist today?

I was unsurprised to find that the tactic was initially developed by Julius Caesar as a military, political and economic tactic.  Divide et impera was used against the conquest of Palestine as well as Macedonia. Machiavelli was a strong advocate and it was also used by Napoleon.  It is a much beloved tactic used during the colonial period by various empires.

According to the Wiki piece on it (http://en.wikipedia.org/...), historically the tactic can be broken down into the following:

•    creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects in order to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign
•    aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign
•    fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers
•    encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending.

It is a strategy that has been used by emperors, kings, military conquers, and colonisers.  But it also has served quite well in the context of Bourgeois Democracy and the Capitalist economic system.  In fact, James Madison (http://en.wikipedia.org/...) made this recommendation in a letter to Thomas Jefferson of 24 October 1787 (http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/...) which summarized his thesis of The Federalist #10 (http://www.constitution.org/...) where he addressed dealing with the different interests based upon class and beliefs of those in society and how to prevent the oppression of the minority by the majority (yes, I am thinking of small numbers of wealthy people being tyrannised by the majority, what else could it refer to?):

"Divide et impera, the reprobated axiom of tyranny, is under certain qualifications, the only policy, by which a republic can be administered on just principles. It must be observed however that this doctrine can only hold within a sphere of a mean extent. As in too small a sphere oppressive combinations may be too easily formed against the weaker party; so in too extensive a one, a defensive concert may be rendered too difficult against the oppression of those entrusted with the administration (http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/...)."

In its modern usage and context, divide and rule is used where the world majority are divided upon the basis of colour, sex, sexual preference, income and country of birth so as to strengthen the hand of those that rule as the ruled are too busy hating, distrusting, and fighting each other so as to hold on to their perceived privileges. So why are they pretending that they are not using it? And why are we letting them get away with it? This would have been a wonderful opportunity for the Labour party to discuss divide and rule tactics, but then again, they have used that tactic themselves. So denial is the best strategy.

Finally, I would argue that she is correct; divide and rule is a tactic predominately used by white people. Why is it that this has occurred?  It is not used by white people because they are white per se, but rather because white people are those in political and economic power and white privilege has enabled the use of this tactic by the powers that be to be successful in dividing people. That is because essentially white people are not only the ruling class in Europe and North America, but also because of the reality of white privilege, white people (especially white men) are incredibly susceptible to this tactic.  It is a tactic used by people in power to maintain their power. Dividing people so that they oppose each other’s fights for social, economic and political justice by using racism, sexism, xenophobia and homophobia is an incredibly useful tactic. It is used to deny political, social and economic rights of people of colour and women and it continues to be used to divide the working class (skilled from unskilled, high from low income), the middle class from the working class, men from women, white people from people of colour, and to divide natural allies domestically and internationally.

Originally posted to NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:07 PM PST.

Also republished by Anti-Capitalist Chat and Black Kos community.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (21+ / 0-)

    "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

    by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:07:27 PM PST

  •  it's used by white people (11+ / 0-)

    not because they are white per se, but because white privilege is still a strongly divisive and hierarchical force in contemporary society.

    The reasons aren't biological, but sociological.

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:27:09 PM PST

    •  exactly, sociological, historical, based upon (7+ / 0-)

      power relations ... it is not biological and she did not say that it was ... in fact, I would say the response to her statement by british politicians and the right-wing media is a classic case of divide and rule.

      "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

      by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:29:37 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  The statement was a generalization and should (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        NY brit expat, voroki

        have never been made in a public forum. It is racist and there is no way to change that.
        The matter of an apology is also of interest. To whom is she apologizing? If she is apologizing to the white racists who use such tactics, they should step forward and register themselves, how else can she make a true apology?
        On the other hand, why do white racists deserve an apology for participating in an underhanded and racist activity?
        That leaves the whites who do not use this activity in a racial manner and when you analyze the statement she made, why should she apologize to people she never insulted?
        So the first step should be getting the particulars of those who feel offended, because she was somehow making egregious statements against them. But if they are engaged in the activity she described, then why is an apology necessary.
        On the other hand, if you are not performing these activities, what is there to apologize about?

        "If you tell the truth, you won't have to remember anything", Mark Twain

        by Cruzankenny on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:53:15 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  the statement is not racist it is a statement (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Justina

          of fact; generalisations are made all the time.

          Why do you think the statement is racist? As generalisations go, this one has an element of truth to it. On the rest of what you say, I agree ...

          "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

          by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 03:58:49 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  It was racist because it dealt totally (0+ / 0-)

            with race. It wasn't necessarily a negative comment, but it was racially motivated. Having said that, I feel it was illogical to call for an apology on racial terms, period.

            "If you tell the truth, you won't have to remember anything", Mark Twain

            by Cruzankenny on Sat Jan 07, 2012 at 05:34:31 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

        •  The statement is not racist (4+ / 0-)

          nor is it a generalization.  It's a historically and sociologically accurate statement that is expressed in casual language rather than the more formal phrasing that would make the historical and sociological dimensions of it more clear.

          I suspect the apology was felt necessary because lots of times white folks react defensively when statements about what white people do are made.  Hence my observation about casual language vs. more formal phrasing.

          I don't know how that particular dynamic works in Britain, so that difference in context may also have something to do with the perception of why the apology was deemed if not "necessary" then "advisable" (which is probably how I would characterize it).

          Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

          by a gilas girl on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 04:06:56 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  there was no reason for the apology ... (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Justina, earicicle

            sheer cowardice and pandering on the part of Labour; I expect nothing less than what was said by the Tories, they use this tactic constantly and are using it now.

            "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

            by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 04:12:53 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  The statement was a generalization about what (0+ / 0-)

            "white people" do. If it had referred to a geographical region it wouldn't be racist. If it referred to a religion, it wouldn't be racist. It referred to white people and that statement alone makes it about race. That does not make it negative. Tweeting about race is generally not a positive thing to do for a politician.
            Other than that, I can see no logical reason for an apology except for knee jerk reactions, kind of like the ones you get when you write 'racist'.

            "If you tell the truth, you won't have to remember anything", Mark Twain

            by Cruzankenny on Sat Jan 07, 2012 at 05:41:08 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

      •  Dianne Abbott (0+ / 0-)

        NY Brit, could you please give some info on her constituency. I think it contains the orthodox Jewish area.

        •  No, Golders Green is represented by Mike Freer. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          northsylvania

          Abbott's constituency of Hackney North and Stoke Newington (http://en.wikipedia.org/...) is a mixed working class area with large percentages of ethnic and racial minorities; the area of Hackney has been undergoing some gentrification which has meant in parts of it (probably not in her constituency more in Hackney South and Shoreditch which are hot areas as they are close to the city) housing prices are beyond those of the new housing benefits coverage. It was one of the areas in which there were riots this summer; the one that was touched off in Hackney was due to a police stop and search following the killing of Mark Duggan in Tottenham the day before. Voting patterns are similar to the area in which I live (which is in the borough of Waltham Forest next to hers) where left labour wins (centrist labour would not do well), lib dems are second and the tories are an also ran.

          "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

          by NY brit expat on Sat Jan 07, 2012 at 03:11:27 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  why would it matter if her constituency contained (0+ / 0-)

          the orthodox Jewish area? In fact, Mike Freer their MP wrote this about her and Ken Livingstone during the riots, he is a piece of work:

          http://www.thecommentator.com/...

          "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

          by NY brit expat on Sat Jan 07, 2012 at 03:21:16 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  white people are ignorant (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Chitown Kev

    so they are hesitant to believe in concepts like white-privilege because they so rarely have experiences with people that DO NOT have white-privilege. I think this is why Clegg has to say what he does; fear that voters will misunderstand (and they will) the issue of racism no matter how honest he is about it, and that will lead to him being thrown out of office. That's giving him a lot of benefit of the doubt though that he's not just as ignorant as his voters are.

    •  That is giving him a lot of benefit of the (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Justina, Chitown Kev

      doubt, he is not ignorant and knows damn well that divide and rule is a tactic constantly in use by those in power. So, no he doesn't have to say it, he didn't have to weigh in and he could own up to the fact that the tactic is constantly in use by those in power including the government of which he is a member.

      This could have been a great discussion of the use of a tactic commonly associated with despots that is always used by those in power. I guess I cannot expect those that use the tactic to own up to it; acknowledgement dilutes its power, but still ...

      "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

      by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 04:10:28 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Divide and Rule Through Racism Is Historical Fact. (7+ / 0-)

    In the United States, we have only to look at Strom Thurmond's "Dixiecrats" and Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy", which continues to the current day, to see how white politicians cultivated the racism of white voters to separate the white working class from the black working class and insure their own elections.

    Convict Bush, Cheney and their torture cabal. Support universal health care,unions, WikiLeaks and Occupy Wall Street! Time for a totally new, democratic economic system. Turn the corporations into worker cooperatives!

    by Justina on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 04:32:52 PM PST

    •  It is a common tactic and to see those that (5+ / 0-)

      employ it pretend that they are not doing so or have not done so is such grotesque unmitigated gall that I am simply furious; I know that they are liars and hypocrites but this is simply pathetic.

      Over and over again we can demonstrate clear historical examples and she is called a racist while the powerful utilise racism and this tactic over and over again. appalling  ... and they do it with smiles on their faces ...

      "Hegel noticed somewhere that all great world history facts and people so to speak twice occur. He forgot to add: the one time as tragedy, the other time as farce" Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte .

      by NY brit expat on Fri Jan 06, 2012 at 04:50:57 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  a little off topic (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    NY brit expat

    Wasn't Diane Abbott's father featured on 60 Minutes a few years back...I believe he's an expatriate from the South?

  •  No, not the one I'm thinking of (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    NY brit expat

    but that man's dughter is in the House of Commons...can't think of the name.

    Abbott is right though...when one considers that "white people" are the ruling class and the economic power in this society.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site