Skip to main content


Newt has proposed a Tax plan -- just because that Corporate Raider class has been paying too dang much on all their "investment income" ... for too dang long ... apparently.


Newt Gingrich’s big, bad ideas
by Ezra Klein, WashingtonPost -- Jan 24, 2012

[...]
Gingrich’s plan would permanently extend the George W. Bush tax cuts. But it would also create a parallel tax system that anyone could opt into. This system would impose a 15 percent flat tax. Capital gains, dividends and interest income would be tax-free (so Mitt Romney would, in theory, pay a tax rate near zero). The corporate tax rate would be cut from 35 percent to 12.5 percent.
[...]


And Newt's plan would lower that Capital Gains tax all the way down to near 0% and he would then even name that Zero tax after his good friend Millionaire Mitt.  Why not call it the Greenrich Tax, Newt?

Mitt seems to like the idea -- the lower the better.  Afterall Corporate Raiding is hard work. What with keeping track of all those fire-sale assets and all ...


Republican primary debate -- January 23, 2012 -- Tampa, Fla.
WashingtonPost -- Issues and transcript

[...]
Mitt Romney:  [...] And that's why I put forward a plan to eliminate the tax on savings for middle income Americans. Anyone making under $200,000 a year, I would eliminate the tax on interest, dividends and capital gains. People need help to be able to save their money.
[...]

Newt Gingrich: [...] The biggest thing I think will be -- and I think you indicated the other day that you pay something like a 15 percent marginal rate. My position is not to attack him for paying a 15 percent marginal rate. I have in my tax proposal an alternative flat tax on the Hong Kong model, where you get to choose what you want, and our rate's 15 percent. So I'm prepared to describe my 15 percent flat tax as the Mitt Romney flat tax. I'd like to bring everybody else down to Mitt's rate, not try to bring him up to some other rate.

Mitt Romney:  Mr. Speaker, is the tax on capital gains also 15 percent or is it zero?

Newt Gingrich:  Zero.

Mitt Romney:  Well, under that -- under that plan, I'd have paid no taxes in the last two years.
[...]


So America, are you ready for the "Mitt Romney flat tax" for fat cats, at the stunningly low, low rate of Zero percent?

You can bet the 1 Percenters are ...


There IS another option for getting a fair share of those Millionaire windfalls -- it's call the Warren Buffet Fair Tax.  And it makes a lot of sense, a lot of common sense.

President Obama did a great job of explaining the Buffet Tax, in the State of the Union speech:

State of the Union:  Obama rejoins tax debate with Buffett rule
by Russell Allyn, LA Progressive Examiner -- January 24, 2012

[...]
President Obama had a rejoinder to these Republican proposals in his State of the Union Address this evening:
[...]
Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 per cent in taxes. . . .  [I]f you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 per cent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up. You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. You’re the ones who need relief.

Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.


In any event, if the House Republicans can't be convinced to make Millionaires, like Mint and Greenrich pay their fair share (not likely) -- well laws already enacted, just might do it for them, anyways.

The days of the 15 percent tax rate are numbered
by Donald Marron, Guest blogger, csmonitor.com -- Jan 25, 2012

[...]
On January 1, 2013, capital gains taxes are scheduled to go up sharply.
[...]

Put it all together, and the top tax rate on capital gains is scheduled to increase from 15% today to 25% on January 1. That’s a big jump. If taxpayers really believe this will happen, expect a torrent of asset selling in November and December as wealthy taxpayers take final advantage of the lower rate.


No wonder Newt-Romney are peddling their Mitt Romney Flat Tax so eagerly -- there's real money on the table THEY will have to ante up, if one of them can't figure out a way, to match the President's bet on the Buffet Tax. If not, then they'll have to divest some of those Million dollar capital chips -- and what 1%-er wants to do that -- and have to pay the ordinary Tax Rates, that average people do?


Perhaps the GOP Downsizing-enablers should try to read a few polls to see just which side of that Revenue-burden-sharing divide the vast majority of American people are on -- the Flat 0% Mitt Tax or the Fair 30% Warren Tax ...

Center for American Progress

[...]
Many recent polls bear this out. In an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll in November, for example, 76 percent agreed and 60 percent strongly agreed that:
“The current economic structure of the country is out of balance and favors a very small proportion of the rich over the rest of the country. America needs to reduce the power of major banks and corporations and demand greater accountability and transparency. The government should not provide financial aid to corporations and should not provide tax breaks to the rich.”

Only 12% disagreed with that statement.


Ooops, another "winning" policy of the GOP-Norquist story-tellers.  That is, only if they don't bother to ask the American people first what we might want ... to help strengthen in OUR Opportunity-for-ALL country.



Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 04:10 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PatriciaVa, jfromga, kurt


    What is necessary to change a person is to change his awareness of himself.
    -- Maslow ...... my list.

    by jamess on Wed Jan 25, 2012 at 07:34:13 PM PST

  •  Our democratic President lobbied his (0+ / 0-)

    democratically controlled congress to extend the expiring Bush tax cuts in 2010. In what was nearly their last act as the majority party, they did so.

    Now we have more talk and a snowballs chance in hell of regaining control of the house and might even lose the Semate.

    I wouldn't take the bet that this government is going do the right thing when it comes to taxation.

  •  Doesn't Matter. Neither is Remotely Right nt (0+ / 0-)

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 05:55:28 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site