Skip to main content

The Kaiser Family Foundation has released its Health Tracking Poll for January, this time focusing on the Affordable Care Act and the current case before the Supreme Court challenging the law. It's remarkable for one particular finding, just how cynical the American public is about one of the most revered of institutions, the Supreme Court.

KFF/SCOTUS poll
That's probably the result of a decade's worth of very political decisions, from Bush v. Gore to Citizens United. The Court certainly isn't immune from the cynicism and distrust of political institution rampant in America, and justifiably so. Unsurprisingly, the majority of those asked, 55 percent, believe that the conservative court will find the law's individual mandate unconstitutional. The mandate itself is still highly unpopular with the "public more than twice as likely to have an unfavorable rather than favorable view of the provision (67% to 30%)."

However, the generally split attitude of the public toward the law as a whole is far more closely divided, 37 percent with a favorable opinion and 44 percent with an unfavorable opinion. But, and this is an important but, that unfavorable could include those who think the law needs to be expanded. Reinforcing that, more people would like to see the law kept and expanded than repealed: "the share of the public that favors expanding the law (31%) or keeping it in its current form (19%) remains larger than the share who would like to see the law repealed outright (22%) or repealed and replaced with a Republican-backed alternative (18%)."

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 11:49 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.