Skip to main content

Do you want Mr. Obama to win the elections this fall?  Then please help him by contacting him to tell him to stop doing one of the most boneheaded things a politician can do these days - alienate younger voters and internet users by threatening the internet.  Further, you should let him know that what is worse than the actual content of the agreement that he is imposing is the means by which he is imposing it.  Mr. Obama is engaging in an arrogant end-run around constitutional process that reeks of the tactics used by the Bush administration in the grips of their "unitary executive" orgy of power-grabbing.  You should be concerned because Mr. Obama is robbing you of an opportunity to work within the system to change laws that need reform like the DMCA.

What I'm talking about is the Obama administration's actions with regard to ACTA.

Here is a video that explains ACTA:

ACTA is yet another attempt by the corporate thugs who tried to bring you SOPA and PIPA to protect their profits at the expense of destroying the internet culture as we know it.  ACTA differs from SOPA and PIPA in that it is an international treaty, a multi-lateral trade agreement between nations that would set up its own standards organization to govern regulation of counterfeit goods, generic medicines and copyright infringement on the internet by its member nations.

ACTA was created as a secret, back-room deal and input from internet rights groups, free speech advocates and the general public was excluded in an opaque process so twisted and bizarre that it caused the European rapporteur for ACTA to resign his position in disgust:

"I want to denounce in the strongest possible manner the entire process that led to the signature of this agreement: no inclusion of civil society organisations, a lack of transparency from the start of the negotiations, repeated postponing of the signature of the text without an explanation being ever given, exclusion of the EU Parliament's demands that were expressed on several occasions in our assembly.

As rapporteur of this text, I have faced never-before-seen manoeuvres from the right wing of this Parliament to impose a rushed calendar before public opinion could be alerted, thus depriving the Parliament of its right to expression and of the tools at its disposal to convey citizens' legitimate demands.”

Everyone knows the ACTA agreement is problematic, whether it is its impact on civil liberties, the way it makes Internet access providers liable, its consequences on generic drugs manufacturing, or how little protection it gives to our geographical indications.

This agreement might have major consequences on citizens' lives, and still, everything is being done to prevent the European Parliament from having its say in this matter. That is why today, as I release this report for which I was in charge, I want to send a strong signal and alert the public opinion about this unacceptable situation. I will not take part in this masquerade."

Regardless of this the EU did sign on to the treaty and a ratification process awaits.

At least those lucky Europeans get to have an opportunity to effect the process by pestering their representatives about ratification.  Unfortunately, we in the United States will not get that opportunity.  

Want to know the reason that Americans are going to be deprived of the opportunity to participate in our customary democratic process regarding this issue?

President Obama has decided unilaterally that ACTA is an "executive agreement" and not a treaty, thus there is no need for the Senate to ratify it.

See here:

Ordinarily, treaties need to be submitted to the US Senate for ratification, but the Obama administration has adopted the novel (and, some have argued, constitutionally dubious) approach of declaring ACTA an "executive agreement" that can be adopted unilaterally by the executive branch, as it ostensibly does not alter existing US law.

Apparently Mr. Obama is going to issue another signing statement. Here's why he's wrong:

Thus, the administration argues that there doesn't need to be a Senate review because no laws will be changed. This is, of course, wrong, since ACTA (1) does not align itself fully with US laws and (2) massively constrains Congress's ability to change certain intellectual property laws in the future. Furthermore, this basic argument is ridiculous. The President is only allowed to sign executive agreements that cover items solely under the President's mandate. Intellectual property is not. It's clearly given to Congress under the Constitution.

Mr. Obama is making two tragic mistakes here, First, taking the politically maladroit position of signing a flawed treaty that when publicized will offend a large portion of the electorate.  Second and more importantly, if he gets away with this high-handed approach to treaties, surely less savory successors to his office will do the same thing with similarly (or possibly more) odious treaties.

Your action is needed.  Contact Mr. Obama and tell him to stop this abomination, and also take this opportunity to sign on to this petition.  

Update: it appears that Mr. Obama would like to double down.

Originally posted to joe shikspack on Fri Feb 03, 2012 at 05:32 AM PST.

Also republished by The Rebel Alliance, ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement, The Amateur Left, Progressive Policy Zone, and Team DFH.


President Obama's handling of this matter:

64%31 votes
4%2 votes
8%4 votes
22%11 votes

| 48 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site