Skip to main content

An  anonymous leaker sent a number of climate-science related bloggers/blog-sites a trove of internal documents from libertarian Heartland Institute.  While the material points to many nefarious Heartland Institute efforts, such as supporting undermining of Wisconsin's public education, the most extensive material is about Heartland's heartless efforts to foster disinformation about climate science, to undermine Americans' access to accurate information, and to weaken America's K-12 science education.

In what looks almost certainly to be backed by focused group testing, Heartlands' K-12 climate disinformation strategy targets "dissuading teachers from teaching science".  Here is the key paragraph from the heartless "climate education" plans

Principals and teachers are heavily biased toward the alarmist perspective. To counter this we are considering launching an effort to develop alternative materials for K-12 classrooms. We are pursuing a proposal to produce a global warming curriculum for K-12 schools [this] effort will focus on providing curriculum that shows that the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain -- two key points that are effective at dissuading teachers from teaching science.
Yes, the heartless Heartland Institute plans to spend significant sums of money to develop an anti-science curriculum to foster confusion about climate change in line with Luntz' political guidance to use 'climate change' because it fosters uncertainty about the state of climate science and will undermine efforts to act to mitigate climate change to help us avoid catastrophic climate chaos.  Let is be clear that Heartland isn't interested in honest examination of science (after all, why would Heartland's Climate Change wiki be closed to actual science if they were interested in truth?) or fostering an educational system that better prepares American students for the science-related challenges and opportunities that will dominate the 21st century.  No, in support of polluting interests, the Heartland Institute's climate strategy is targeted at "dissuading teachers from teaching science".
"Dissuading teachers from teaching science ..."
It is hard to imagine a worse objective or more heartless for anything claiming to be an educational initiative.

While there is much to be learned from this Valentine's Day breaking DissuadeGate data dump from within the science denier world, among the items of real interest in this Heart-Less Valentine's Day news item: an anonymous lover ("Anonymous Donor") of the Heartland Institute's efforts to infect America's youth with anti-science syndrome.  One person, according to the January 2012 Heat-less Climate Denial Strategy document (pdf), provides over 20 percent of Heartland's entire budget with plans to increase that funding;

Our climate work is attractive to funders, especially our key Anonymous Donor (whose contribution dropped from $1,664,150 in 2010 to $979,000 in 2011 - about 20% of our total 2011 revenue). He has promised an increase in 2012…”
Yes, in addition to the significant Koch-otopus support ($100,000s per year plus access to Koch's secret cabal of right-wing funders) and donations from corporations like Microsoft, Heartland's heartless disinformation efforts targeting the undermining of America's science education with promotion of anti-science syndrome are funded anonymously.  Hmmm ... Don't you want to know who is trying to manipulate your child's education to support their financial interests?


Clearly, my focus (and the primary portion of the material) is on Heartland's heartless climate disinformation efforts. But, to reiterate, Heartland is involved in other things of concern / interest to this community.  For example, from the totally Heartless 2012 budget document, there is the $91,500 in the 2012 budget for "Operation Angry Badger"

A research and education project built to take advantage of the public interest in
Wisconsin’s Act 10 generated by recall elections that could take place. Publications Dept.
budget includes printing and mailing three reports and brochures.
Hmmm ... might this sort of activity (and information) attract the attention of 'non-Green' front pagers, like Chris Bowers, who this might understand how critical climate change and science can and should be in the political process?


Disclaimer: The Heartland Institute is now claiming that these documents have likely been altered or faked.

I can not prove that these documents are real or fake.  As possible, I will pass on information that comes along about this. Have a look at the documents and make up your own mind.

Let us be clear, however, that the Heartland Institute has been engaged -- systematically -- in demeaning climate science and sowing confusion as to the science.  This, sigh, fostered credibility as to the document release along with the delayed responsiveness to numerous media requests for comment.

And, for a moment, let us consider what The Heartland Institute argued related to the criminal theft of material from East Anglia University (e.g., re ClimateGate):

"The release of these documents creates an opportunity for reporters,  academics, politicians, and others who relied on the IPCC to form their  opinions about global warming to stop and reconsider their position. The  experts they trusted and quoted in the past have been caught red-handed  plotting to conceal data, hide temperature trends that contradict their  predictions, and keep critics from appearing in peer-reviewed journals.  This is new and real evidence that they should examine and then comment  on publicly."

Discussions of the Heartless Documents

A note

This situation clearly has some resonance and parallels with "ClimateGate". Let's explore, however, some differences:

1.  Unlike the illegal breaking into East Anglia's computers, the Heartless Valentine's Day material does not look to have come from an outside theft but from an insider who has chosen, for whatever reason, to 'leak' the material (almost certainly without authorization) and be a(n anonymous) whistleblower.

2.  Unlike the selective leaking of the stolen East Anglia's email correspondance, the Heartless Valentine's Day material has been, from the get go, put into public in its entirety -- with any 'cherry-picking' of material that leads to misrepresentation easily discovered.

3.  Unlike the stolen East Anglia's email correspondance, the Heartless Valentine's Day material are completed (formal) documents. This isn't back and forth draft material between colleagues, engaged in what they saw as interactions with colleagues as they sought to figure out how to move forward, but the formalized results of drafts/etc ... There is something quite different between one's informal (midnight ...) email and an institution's formalized planning documents.

4. Sigh, unlike with the distorted coverage the stolen East Anglia correspondence with the RWSM machine (from bloggers to Hannity/Beck to Faux "News" to the RNC ...) backing, we cannot expect that the nation's "journalists" will give front page attention to this heartless effort advocating "dissuading teachers from teaching science".

And, well, as for the motivation of the leaker -- perhaps he (or she) was motivated, on Valentine's Day 2012, by a love of the planet's ability to support modern human civilization.

Originally posted to Science Matters on Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 07:46 AM PST.

Also republished by Climate Hawks and DK GreenRoots.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site