Skip to main content


George Lakoff is one of my heros. He tells it like it is. He tells the truth as he knows it, whether people listen to him or not.  Whether people take the time to heed his advice or not, he just keeps on saying what needs to be said.

A wise man he is, some say.


What Conservatives Really Want
by George Lakoff, readersupportednews -- Feb 19, 2011
-- Dedicated to the peaceful protestors in Wisconsin, Feb 19, 2011

The central issue in our political life is not being discussed. At stake is the moral basis of American democracy.
[...]

In the 2008 campaign, candidate Obama accurately described the basis of American democracy: Empathycitizens caring for each other, both social and personal responsibility — acting on that care, and an ethic of excellence. From these, our freedoms and our way of life follow, as does the role of government: to protect and empower everyone equally. Protection includes safety, health, the environment, pensions and empowerment starts with education and infrastructure. No one can be free without these, and without a commitment to care and act on that care by one’s fellow citizens.

The conservative worldview rejects all of that.

Conservatives believe in individual responsibility alone, not social responsibility. They don’t think government should help its citizens. That is, they don’t think citizens should help each other. The part of government they want to cut is not the military (we have over 800 military bases around the world), not government subsidies to corporations, not the aspect of government that fits their worldview. They want to cut the part that helps people. Why? Because that violates individual responsibility.
[...]


Or in other words:

Conservatives see life as a Competition, and the one with the most stuff in the end, WINS!

Liberals see life as a Journey, and the more people we interact with and help out along the way, the better off EVERYONE might someday be.


Different motives.  Different world-views.  And the intersection between this these differing sides of town can be tricky to navigate sometimes.  Especially with that broken crosswalk signal, that barely keeps step with the daily traffic most days.


I know several different conservatives, and occasionally I try to converse with them on the topic of politics -- although much less than I used to.  (Life is too short and stressful enough already, lol.)

Well recently I had one of those conversations.  The insights it gave me into the Conservative mindset, were startling to say the least.  It went something like this ...


My conservatives associate told me flat out:

People are fallible, lazy, and shifty;

While Corporations are mission-driven, efficient, and thrifty.


Thus Government SHOULD cater to the needs of Corporations,

and NOT to the needs of People -- (Most people can't really be trusted, anyways.)

That is nearly verbatim. Needless to say I was stunned.


I mentally chalked it up to what Lakoff had said, about Conservatives trusting Corporations as wise authority figures, much more than they trust any individuals.

After some follow-up questioning on my part about corporations being driven by "short-term greed" more so than "long-term wise investments", my conservative aquaintaince summed his view on employer-employee relations, as so:

"People should only be rewarded for their hard-work, and that alone.  If someone won't work hard, they shouldn't eat."

Well there are several counter-arguments to take when confronted with such reasoning;  any of these rhetorical fracture-lines will do:

Corporate corruption, people unable to work, economic downturns, 1% boards of directors

... but the tact I took was to tread down a more "personal line" ...


I asked him how he felt about Corporations that perform needless layoffs -- Corporations that outsource Jobs just to boost their quarterly profits?

You see, we both knew a middle manager who had been "downsized" through no fault of his own (a 99er now).

I asked him,  

What about So-and-so?

He was a "hard worker", right?

Did he "deserve" that sort of Corporate "reward"?

especially after 15+ years of loyal service to the corporate managers?


Well, my conservative friend could only manage a meek "No. Well no he didn't."

"But that's just business" he quickly threw in for good measure ...


My reply back, without missing a beat, was:

"What if we are next on that outsourcing cost-cutting corporate band wagon -- What then?

We work hard, right?  (especially after all that downsizing) ... What then, if you or I are next on their list?  That's just life in the Big City, eh?


Corporations don't "look so noble" -- so all-knowing and wise -- in that kind of spotlight;

In the spotlight of hard-working Americans they cast aside, like last year's news.


Simply ask an Authoritarian yes-man:

Do they know anyone Laid-off and still Unemployed?  And did that person deserved it?  


That should short circuit a few of their fuses.

.
.
.


I've heard progressive radio personality Thom Hartmann, summarize these competing world-views (frames), on how political parties view governing authorities in their lives, as follows (roughly put):

Republicans need an Authoritative "Father Figure"

-- Telling them what to do.


Democrats need a Nurturing "Father Figure"

-- Helping us each, to reach our potential.


That does some it up well, doesn't it:


Either were each in this together  (the journey of life)

Or were each on our own   (consigned to a living hell).


Which world-view would you rather be stuck in?  Given the option of course.

Assuming that die has not already been permanently cast ... assuming your corporate-fearing lot in life, is not already set in stone ...  

What then?  What road would you choose, given the choice ...



Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Sat Feb 18, 2012 at 09:11 PM PST.

Also republished by Occupy Wall Street.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Angie in WA State, DeminNewJ, PLS, Odysseus, MadRuth, glitterscale, Shockwave, Caniac41, donna in evanston, Wintermute, cotterperson, SanJoseLady, Stein, GayHillbilly, eeff, rubyr, xynz, windwardguy46, niemann, Theodoric of York Medieval Liberal, tyler93023, TracieLynn, cskendrick, annrose, roses, JuliaAnn, fumie, Cedwyn, hopeful, aitchdee, tomephil, Nag, annan, danthrax, Dr Colossus, Kentucky DeanDemocrat, Damnit Janet, texasmom, Steven Payne, defluxion10, Tillie630, rlharry, Buzzer, riverlover, Brian82, outragedinSF, KateCrashes, zerelda, Curt Matlock, tomjones, NapaJulie, Deward Hastings, xxdr zombiexx, Armand451, sawgrass727, sb, ExStr8, kbman, marina, radarlady, Harkov311, ichibon, JohnB47, basquebob, dewtx, ChemBob, Laurence Lewis, fixxit, Spoc42, cfk, jimreyn, where4art, GreyHawk, Kayakbiker, markdd, davidslane, SBandini, Jlukes, bunsk, Unduna, coloradorob, mightymouse, Alan Arizona, Oye Sancho, Jim R, Jim P, begone, BachFan, detroitmechworks, Keone Michaels, cybersaur, 417els, Mr Bojangles, Clytemnestra, Themistoclea, dopper0189, vernon nackulus, tonyahky, mooshter, Son of a Cat, claudette, NBBooks, philipmerrill, Ashaman, Crashing Vor, real world chick, Preston S, ER Doc, middleagedhousewife, anninla, bumbi, Unknown Quantity, profh, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, Ian Reifowitz, nannyboz, Statusquomustgo, ms badger, sea note, cpresley, Babylon, seabos84, One Pissed Off Liberal, Msanger, out of left field, Habitat Vic, byDesign, camlbacker, Debs2, offgrid, leftyguitarist, bfbenn, linkage, DvCM, Mary Mike, Matt Z, certainot, bnasley, stratocasterman, millwood, Moderation, jhop7, carpunder, OIL GUY, Dion, pioneer111, Sarea, GeorgeXVIII, janatallow, BasharH, TomP, Mighty Ike, JDWolverton, jwinIL14, rogerdaddy, gundyj, Amor Y Risa, Roger Fox, HappyinNM, Sixty Something, bythesea, elwior, lineatus, KJG52, monkeybrainpolitics, weddedgay, triplepoint, Jeff Y, Tam in CA, Liberal Of Limeyland, Gemina13, glendaw271, petulans, kallen808, Ann Marie Brenda, Cobbler, DixieDishrag, magicsister, Robobagpiper, palantir, Mike Taylor, oldliberal, LaFeminista, clent, lancecote, prettygirlxoxoxo, Rhysling, Ran3dy, Rick Aucoin, ARS, greengemini, nchristine, lostinamerica, banjolele, War on Error, dfe, CamillesDad1, DefendOurConstitution, geebeebee, elziax, MKSinSA, uno beagle, Leslie in KY, Keith Pickering, IreGyre, augustin, Leftcandid, Lefty Ladig, Amber6541, dtruth, commonmass, David PA, flitedocnm, one love, NJpeach, estreya, politik, LOrion, 2questions, ATFILLINOIS, Eddie L, Arenosa, gulfgal98, pixxer, petesmom, ZedMont, Actbriniel, Onomastic, Mike08, kerflooey, ozsea1, Bob Duck, bgblcklab1, La Gitane, Player to be named later, DocJones, southernmapper, FarWestGirl, kiwiheart, orchestra guy, deeproots, cama2008, mrsgoo, marleycat, zukesgirl64, dle2GA, IndyReader, Yogurt721, floridablue, merrily1000, createpeace, poliwrangler, Eric Stetson, SteelerGrrl, Sunspots, zenox, DRo, googie, aerie star, Kurt from CMH, BoulderStevo, BlueDragon, SuWho, livingthedream, stormicats, anodnhajo, StonyB, damfino, Siri, molecularlevel, ahumbleopinion, Eric Nelson, nellgwen, AnnieR, Joieau, a2nite, swampyankee, congenitalefty, Horace Boothroyd III, This old man, TBug, radical simplicity, BusyinCA, MartyM, Had Enough Right Wing BS, wxorknot, rat racer, FrY10cK, ItsaMathJoke, Glen The Plumber, dotdash2u, wasatch, Patrick is Lucky, Phoebe Loosinhouse, Stills, Abelia, Captain Chaos, Prospect Park, Chaddiwicker, ForestLake, Dancun74, Eric Twocents, GenXBadger, Setsuna Mudo, SanFernandoValleyMom, ladyjames, jbeck, Yastreblyansky, LaraJones

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site